@inproceedings{DeanSeidelKnoeteletal., author = {Dean, Mason N. and Seidel, R. and Kn{\"o}tel, David and Lyons, K. and Baum, Daniel and Weaver, James C. and Fratzl, Peter}, title = {To build a shark: 3D tiling laws of tessellated cartilage}, series = {Abstract in Integrative and Comparative Biology; conference Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology annual meeting, January 3-7, 2016, Portland, USA}, volume = {56 (suppl 1)}, booktitle = {Abstract in Integrative and Comparative Biology; conference Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology annual meeting, January 3-7, 2016, Portland, USA}, abstract = {The endoskeleton of sharks and rays (elasmobranchs) is comprised of a cartilaginous core, covered by thousands of mineralized tiles, called tesserae. Characterizing the relationship between tesseral morphometrics, skeletal growth and mechanics is challenging because tesserae are small (a few hundred micrometers wide), anchored to the surrounding tissue in complex three-dimensional ways, and occur in huge numbers. We integrate material property, histology, electron microscopy and synchrotron and laboratory µCT scans of skeletal elements from an ontogenetic series of round stingray Urobatis halleri, to gain insights into the generation and maintenance of a natural tessellated system. Using a custom-made semiautomatic segmentation algorithm, we present the first quantitative and 3d description of tesserae across whole skeletal elements. The tessellation is not interlocking or regular, with tesserae showing a great range of shapes, sizes and number of neighbors. This is partly region-dependent: for example, thick, columnar tesserae are arranged in series along convex edges with small radius of curvature (RoC), whereas more brick- or disc-shaped tesserae are found in planar/flatter areas. Comparison of the tessellation across ontogeny, shows that in younger animals, the forming tesseral network is less densely packed, appearing as a covering of separate, poorly mineralized islands that grow together with age to form a complete surface. Some gaps in the tessellation are localized to specific regions in all samples, indicating they are real features, perhaps either regions of delayed mineralization or of tendon insertion. We will use the structure of elasmobranch skeletons as a road map for understanding shark and ray skeletal mechanics, but also to extract fundamental engineering principles for tiled composite materials.}, language = {en} } @article{SeidelBlumerZaslanskyetal., author = {Seidel, Ronald and Blumer, Michael and Zaslansky, Paul and Kn{\"o}tel, David and Huber, Daniel R. and Weaver, James C. and Fratzl, Peter and Omelon, Sidney and Bertinetti, Luca and Dean, Mason N.}, title = {Ultrastructural, material and crystallographic description of endophytic masses - a possible damage response in shark and ray tessellated calcified cartilage}, series = {Journal of Structural Biology}, journal = {Journal of Structural Biology}, doi = {10.1016/j.jsb.2017.03.004}, abstract = {The cartilaginous endoskeletons of Elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) are reinforced superficially by minute, mineralized tiles, called tesserae. Unlike the bony skeletons of other vertebrates, elasmobranch skeletons have limited healing capability and their tissues' mechanisms for avoiding damage or managing it when it does occur are largely unknown. Here we describe an aberrant type of mineralized elasmobranch skeletal tissue called endophytic masses (EPMs), which grow into the uncalcified cartilage of the skeleton, but exhibit a strikingly different morphology compared to tesserae and other elasmobranch calcified tissues. We use biological and materials characterization techniques, including computed tomography, electron and light microscopy, x-ray and Raman spectroscopy and histology to characterize the morphology, ultrastructure and chemical composition of tesserae-associated EPMs in different elasmobranch species. EPMs appear to develop between and in intimate association with tesserae, but lack the lines of periodic growth and varying mineral density characteristic of tesserae. EPMs are mineral-dominated (high mineral and low organic content), comprised of birefringent bundles of large monetite or brushite crystals aligned end to end in long strings. Both Unusual skeletal mineralization in elasmobranchs tesserae and EPMs appear to develop in a type-2 collagen-based matrix, but in contrast to tesserae, all chondrocytes embedded or in contact with EPMs are dead and mineralized. The differences outlined between EPMs and tesserae demonstrate them to be distinct tissues. We discuss several possible reasons for EPM development, including tissue reinforcement, repair, and disruptions of mineralization processes, within the context of elasmobranch skeletal biology as well as descriptions of damage responses of other vertebrate mineralized tissues.}, language = {en} } @article{AllenDavisGoodaleetal.2005, author = {Allen, Gabrielle and Davis, K. and Goodale, Tom and Hutanu, Andrei and Kaiser, Hartmut and Kielmann, Thilo and Merzky, Andre and Nieuwpoort, R. and Reinefeld, Alexander and Schintke, Florian and Sch{\"u}tt, Thorsten and Seidel, Edward and Ullmer, Brygg}, title = {The Grid Application Toolkit: Toward Generic and Easy Appliction Programming Interfaces for the Grid}, series = {Procceedings of the IEEE}, volume = {93}, journal = {Procceedings of the IEEE}, number = {3}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society Press}, doi = {10.1109/JPROC.2004.842755}, pages = {534 -- 550}, year = {2005}, language = {en} }