@article{HildebrandtBrueningSchmidtetal., author = {Hildebrandt, Thomas and Bruening, Jan Joris and Schmidt, Nora Laura and Lamecker, Hans and Heppt, Werner and Zachow, Stefan and Goubergrits, Leonid}, title = {The Healthy Nasal Cavity - Characteristics of Morphology and Related Airflow Based on a Statistical Shape Model Viewed from a Surgeon's Perspective}, series = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, volume = {35}, journal = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1677721}, pages = {9 -- 13}, abstract = {Functional surgery on the nasal framework requires referential criteria to objectively assess nasal breathing for indication and follow-up. Thismotivated us to generate amean geometry of the nasal cavity based on a statistical shape model. In this study, the authors could demonstrate that the introduced nasal cavity's mean geometry features characteristics of the inner shape and airflow, which are commonly observed in symptom-free subjects. Therefore, the mean geometry might serve as a reference-like model when one considers qualitative aspects. However, to facilitate quantitative considerations and statistical inference, further research is necessary. Additionally, the authorswere able to obtain details about the importance of the isthmus nasi and the inferior turbinate for the intranasal airstream.}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtBrueningLameckeretal., author = {Hildebrandt, Thomas and Bruening, Jan Joris and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Heppt, Werner and Schmidt, Nora and Goubergrits, Leonid}, title = {Digital Analysis of Nasal Airflow Facilitating Decision Support in Rhinosurgery}, series = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, volume = {35}, journal = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1677720}, pages = {1 -- 8}, abstract = {Successful functional surgery on the nasal framework requires reliable and comprehensive diagnosis. In this regard, the authors introduce a new methodology: Digital Analysis of Nasal Airflow (diANA). It is based on computational fluid dynamics, a statistical shape model of the healthy nasal cavity and rhinologic expertise. diANA necessitates an anonymized tomographic dataset of the paranasal sinuses including the complete nasal cavity and, when available, clinical information. The principle of diANA is to compare the morphology and the respective airflow of an individual nose with those of a reference. This enablesmorphometric aberrations and consecutive flow field anomalies to localize and quantify within a patient's nasal cavity. Finally, an elaborated expert opinion with instructive visualizations is provided. Using diANA might support surgeons in decision-making, avoiding unnecessary surgery, gaining more precision, and target-orientation for indicated operations.}, language = {en} } @article{BrueningHildebrandtHepptetal., author = {Br{\"u}ning, Jan and Hildebrandt, Thomas and Heppt, Werner and Schmidt, Nora and Lamecker, Hans and Szengel, Angelika and Amiridze, Natalja and Ramm, Heiko and Bindernagel, Matthias and Zachow, Stefan and Goubergrits, Leonid}, title = {Characterization of the Airflow within an Average Geometry of the Healthy Human Nasal Cavity}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {3755}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, number = {10}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-60755-3}, abstract = {This study's objective was the generation of a standardized geometry of the healthy nasal cavity. An average geometry of the healthy nasal cavity was generated using a statistical shape model based on 25 symptom-free subjects. Airflow within the average geometry and these geometries was calculated using fluid simulations. Integral measures of the nasal resistance, wall shear stresses (WSS) and velocities were calculated as well as cross-sectional areas (CSA). Furthermore, individual WSS and static pressure distributions were mapped onto the average geometry. The average geometry featured an overall more regular shape that resulted in less resistance, reduced wall shear stresses and velocities compared to the median of the 25 geometries. Spatial distributions of WSS and pressure of average geometry agreed well compared to the average distributions of all individual geometries. The minimal CSA of the average geometry was larger than the median of all individual geometries (83.4 vs. 74.7 mm²). The airflow observed within the average geometry of the healthy nasal cavity did not equal the average airflow of the individual geometries. While differences observed for integral measures were notable, the calculated values for the average geometry lay within the distributions of the individual parameters. Spatially resolved parameters differed less prominently.}, language = {en} }