@book{AbbinkBaermannBešinovicetal.2018, author = {Abbink, Erwin and B{\"a}rmann, Andreas and Bešinovic, Nikola and Bohlin, Markus and Cacchiani, Valentina and Caimi, Gabrio and de Fabris, Stefano and Dollevoet, Twan and Fischer, Frank and F{\"u}genschuh, Armin and Galli, Laura and Goverde, Rob M.P. and Hansmann, Ronny and Homfeld, Henning and Huisman, Dennis and Johann, Marc and Klug, Torsten and T{\"o}rnquist Krasemann, Johanna and Kroon, Leo and Lamorgese, Leonardo and Liers, Frauke and Mannino, Carlo and Medeossi, Giorgio and Pacciarelli, Dario and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas and Schmidt, Marie and Sch{\"o}bel, Anita and Sch{\"u}lldorf, Hanno and Stieber, Anke and Stiller, Sebastian and Toth, Paolo and Zimmermann, Uwe}, title = {Handbook of Optimization in the Railway Industry}, volume = {268}, editor = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Klug, Torsten and Lamorgese, Leonardo and Mannino, Carlo and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, isbn = {978-3-319-72152-1}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-72153-8}, year = {2018}, abstract = {This book promotes the use of mathematical optimization and operations research methods in rail transportation. The editors assembled thirteen contributions from leading scholars to present a unified voice, standardize terminology, and assess the state-of-the-art. There are three main clusters of articles, corresponding to the classical stages of the planning process: strategic, tactical, and operational. These three clusters are further subdivided into five parts which correspond to the main phases of the railway network planning process: network assessment, capacity planning, timetabling, resource planning, and operational planning. Individual chapters cover: Simulation Capacity Assessment Network Design Train Routing Robust Timetabling Event Scheduling Track Allocation Blocking Shunting Rolling Stock Crew Scheduling Dispatching Delay Propagation}, language = {en} } @misc{BorndoerferDenissenHelleretal.2021, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Denißen, Jonas and Heller, Simon and Klug, Torsten and K{\"u}pper, Michael and Lindner, Niels and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas and S{\"o}hlke, Andreas and Steadman, William}, title = {Microscopic Timetable Optimization for a Moving Block System}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-82547}, year = {2021}, abstract = {We present an optimization model which is capable of routing and ordering trains on a microscopic level under a moving block regime. Based on a general timetabling definition (GTTP) that allows the plug in of arbitrarily detailed methods to compute running and headway times, we describe a layered graph approach using velocity expansion, and develop a mixed integer linear programming formulation. Finally, we present promising results for a German corridor scenario with mixed traffic, indicating that applying branch-and-cut to our model is able to solve reasonably sized instances with up to hundred trains to optimality.}, language = {en} } @article{BorndoerferKlugLamorgeseetal.2017, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Klug, Torsten and Lamorgese, Leonardo and Mannino, Carlo and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Recent success stories on integrated optimization of railway systems}, volume = {74}, journal = {Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.015}, pages = {196 -- 211}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Planning and operating railway transportation systems is an extremely hard task due to the combinatorial complexity of the underlying discrete optimization problems, the technical intricacies, and the immense size of the problem instances. Because of that, however, mathematical models and optimization techniques can result in large gains for both railway customers and operators, e.g., in terms of cost reductions or service quality improvements. In the last years a large and growing group of researchers in the OR community have devoted their attention to this domain developing mathematical models and optimization approaches to tackle many of the relevant problems in the railway planning process. However, there is still a gap to bridge between theory and practice (e.g. Cacchiani et al., 2014; Bornd{\"o}rfer et al., 2010), with a few notable exceptions. In this paper we address three individual success stories, namely, long-term freight train routing (part I), mid-term rolling stock rotation planning (part II), and real-time train dispatching (part III). In each case, we describe real-life, successful implementations. We will discuss the individual problem setting, survey the optimization literature, and focus on particular aspects addressed by the mathematical models. We demonstrate on concrete applications how mathematical optimization can support railway planning and operations. This gives proof that mathematical optimization can support the planning of railway resources. Thus, mathematical models and optimization can lead to a greater efficiency of railway operations and will serve as a powerful and innovative tool to meet recent challenges of the railway industry.}, language = {en} } @misc{BorndoerferKlugLamorgeseetal.2015, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Klug, Torsten and Lamorgese, Leonardo and Mannino, Carlo and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Recent Success Stories on Optimization of Railway Systems}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-53726}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Planning and operating railway transportation systems is an extremely hard task due to the combinatorial complexity of the underlying discrete optimization problems, the technical intricacies, and the immense size of the problem instances. Because of that, however, mathematical models and optimization techniques can result in large gains for both railway cus- tomers and operators, e.g., in terms of cost reductions or service quality improvements. In the last years a large and growing group of researchers in the OR community have devoted their attention to this domain devel- oping mathematical models and optimization approaches to tackle many of the relevant problems in the railway planning process. However, there is still a gap to bridge between theory and practice, with a few notable exceptions. In this paper we address three success stories, namely, long-term freight train routing (part I), mid-term rolling stock rotation planning (part II), and real-time train dispatching (part III). In each case, we describe real-life, successful implementations. We will dis- cuss the individual problem setting, survey the optimization literature, and focus on particular aspects addressed by the mathematical models. We demonstrate on concrete applications how mathematical optimization can support railway planning and operations. This gives proof that math- ematical optimization can support the planning of rolling stock resources. Thus, mathematical models and optimization can lead to a greater effi- ciency of railway operations and will serve as a powerful and innovative tool to meet recent challenges of the railway industry.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BorndoerferLamorgeseKlugetal.2015, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Lamorgese, Leonardo and Klug, Torsten and Mannino, Carlo and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Recent Success Stories on Optimization of Railway Systems}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the IAROR conference RailTokyo}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Planning and operating railway transportation systems is an extremely hard task due to the combinatorial complexity of the underlying discrete optimization problems, the technical intricacies, and the immense size of the problem instances. Because of that, however, mathematical models and optimization techniques can result in large gains for both railway cus- tomers and operators, e.g., in terms of cost reductions or service quality improvements. In the last years a large and growing group of researchers in the OR community have devoted their attention to this domain devel- oping mathematical models and optimization approaches to tackle many of the relevant problems in the railway planning process. However, there is still a gap to bridge between theory and practice, with a few notable exceptions. In this paper we address three success stories, namely, long-term freight train routing (part I), mid-term rolling stock rotation planning (part II), and real-time train dispatching (part III). In each case, we describe real-life, successful implementations. We will dis- cuss the individual problem setting, survey the optimization literature, and focus on particular aspects addressed by the mathematical models. We demonstrate on concrete applications how mathematical optimization can support railway planning and operations. This gives proof that math- ematical optimization can support the planning of rolling stock resources. Thus, mathematical models and optimization can lead to a greater effi- ciency of railway operations and will serve as a powerful and innovative tool to meet recent challenges of the railway industry.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KlugReutherSchlechte2022, author = {Klug, Torsten and Reuther, Markus and Schlechte, Thomas}, title = {Does Laziness Pay Off? - A Lazy-Constraint Approach to Timetabling}, volume = {106}, booktitle = {22nd Symposium on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems (ATMOS 2022)}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, doi = {10.4230/OASIcs.ATMOS.2022.11}, pages = {11:1 -- 11:8}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Timetabling is a classical and complex task for public transport operators as well as for railway undertakings. The general question is: Which vehicle is taking which route through the transportation network in which order? In this paper, we consider the special setting to find optimal timetables for railway systems under a moving block regime. We directly set up on our work of [8 ], i.e., we consider the same model formulation and real-world instances of a moving block headway system. In this paper, we present a repair heuristic and a lazy-constraint approach utilizing the callback features of Gurobi, see [3]. We provide an experimental study of the different algorithmic approaches for a railway network with 100 and up to 300 train requests. The computational results show that the lazy-constraint approach together with the repair heuristic significantly improves our previous approaches.}, language = {en} } @article{SchlechteBorndoerferDenissenetal.2022, author = {Schlechte, Thomas and Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Denißen, Jonas and Heller, Simon and Klug, Torsten and K{\"u}pper, Michael and Lindner, Niels and Reuther, Markus and S{\"o}hlke, Andreas and Steadman, William}, title = {Timetable Optimization for a Moving Block System}, volume = {22}, journal = {Journal of Rail Transport Planning \& Management}, issn = {2210-9706}, doi = {10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100315}, pages = {100315}, year = {2022}, abstract = {We present an optimization model which is capable of routing and ordering trains on a microscopic level under a moving block regime. Based on a general timetabling definition (GTTP) that allows the plug in of arbitrarily detailed methods to compute running and headway times, we describe a layered graph approach using velocity expansion, and develop a mixed integer linear programming formulation. Finally, we present promising results for a German corridor scenario with mixed traffic, indicating that applying branch-and-cut to our model is able to solve reasonably sized instances with up to hundred trains to optimality.}, language = {en} }