@article{LiPimentelSzengeletal.2021, author = {Li, Jianning and Pimentel, Pedro and Szengel, Angelika and Ehlke, Moritz and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Estacio, Laura and Doenitz, Christian and Ramm, Heiko and Shi, Haochen and Chen, Xiaojun and Matzkin, Franco and Newcombe, Virginia and Ferrante, Enzo and Jin, Yuan and Ellis, David G. and Aizenberg, Michele R. and Kodym, Oldrich and Spanel, Michal and Herout, Adam and Mainprize, James G. and Fishman, Zachary and Hardisty, Michael R. and Bayat, Amirhossein and Shit, Suprosanna and Wang, Bomin and Liu, Zhi and Eder, Matthias and Pepe, Antonio and Gsaxner, Christina and Alves, Victor and Zefferer, Ulrike and von Campe, Cord and Pistracher, Karin and Sch{\"a}fer, Ute and Schmalstieg, Dieter and Menze, Bjoern H. and Glocker, Ben and Egger, Jan}, title = {AutoImplant 2020 - First MICCAI Challenge on Automatic Cranial Implant Design}, volume = {40}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging}, number = {9}, issn = {0278-0062}, doi = {10.1109/TMI.2021.3077047}, pages = {2329 -- 2342}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the MICCAI 2020 AutoImplant Challenge. The approaches and publications submitted and accepted within the challenge will be summarized and reported, highlighting common algorithmic trends and algorithmic diversity. Furthermore, the evaluation results will be presented, compared and discussed in regard to the challenge aim: seeking for low cost, fast and fully automated solutions for cranial implant design. Based on feedback from collaborating neurosurgeons, this paper concludes by stating open issues and post-challenge requirements for intra-operative use.}, language = {en} } @article{LiBitterNguyenetal.2025, author = {Li, Jianning and Bitter, Kerstin and Nguyen, Anh Duc and Shemesh, Hagay and Zaslansky, Paul and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Computational Insights into Root Canal Treatment: A Survey of Selected Methods in Imaging, Segmentation, Morphological Analysis, and Clinical Management}, volume = {13}, journal = {dentistry journal}, number = {12}, publisher = {MDPI}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120579}, pages = {27}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Background/Objectives: Root canal treatment (RCT) is a common dental procedure performed to preserve teeth by removing infected or at-risk pulp tissue caused by caries, trauma, or other pulpal conditions. A successful outcome, among others, depends on accurate identification of the root canal anatomy, planning a suitable therapeutic strategy, and ensuring a bacteria-tight root canal filling. Despite advances in dental techniques, there remains limited integration of computational methods to support key stages of treatment. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of computational methods applied throughout the full workflow of RCT, examining their potential to support clinical decision-making, improve treatment planning and outcome assessment, and help bridge the interdisciplinary gap between dentistry and computational research. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify and analyze computational methods applied to different stages of RCT, including root canal segmentation, morphological analysis, treatment planning, quality evaluation, follow-up, and prognosis prediction. In addition, a taxonomy based on application was developed to categorize these methods based on their function within the treatment process. Insights from the authors' own research experience were also incorporated to highlight implementation challenges and practical considerations. Results: The review identified a wide range of computational methods aimed at enhancing the consistency and efficiency of RCT. Key findings include the use of advanced image processing for segmentation, image analysis for diagnosis and treatment planning, machine learning for morphological classification, and predictive modeling for outcome estimation. While some methods demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic and planning tasks, many remain in experimental stages and lack clinical integration. There is also a noticeable absence of advanced computational techniques for micro-computed tomography and morphological analysis. Conclusions: Computational methods offer significant potential to improve decision-making and outcomes in RCT. However, greater focus on clinical translation and development of cross-modality methodology is needed. The proposed taxonomy provides a structured framework for organizing existing methods and identifying future research directions tailored to specific phases of treatment. This review serves as a resource for both dental professionals, computer scientists and researchers seeking to bridge the gap between clinical practice and computational innovation.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SenguptaKuşLietal.2026, author = {Sengupta, Agniva and Ku{\c{s}}, Dilara and Li, Jianning and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Globally Optimal Pose from Orthographic Silhouettes}, year = {2026}, abstract = {We solve the problem of determining the pose of known shapes in R^3 from their unoccluded silhouettes. The pose is determined up to global optimality using a simple yet under-explored property of the area-of-silhouette: its continuity w.r.t trajectories in the rotation space. The proposed method utilises pre-computed silhouette-signatures, modelled as a response surface of the area-of-silhouettes. Querying this silhouette-signature response surface for pose estimation leads to a strong branching of the rotation search space, making resolution-guided candidate search feasible. Additionally, we utilise the aspect ratio of 2D ellipses fitted to projected silhouettes as an auxiliary global shape signature to accelerate the pose search. This combined strategy forms the first method to efficiently estimate globally optimal pose from just the silhouettes, without being guided by correspondences, for any shape, irrespective of its convexity and genus. We validate our method on synthetic and real examples, demonstrating significantly improved accuracy against comparable approaches.}, language = {en} }