@article{LongrenEigenShubitidzeetal.2023, author = {Longren, Luke L. and Eigen, Lennart and Shubitidze, Ani and Lieschnegg, Oliver and Baum, Daniel and Nyakatura, John A. and Hildebrandt, Thomas and Brecht, Michael}, title = {Dense Reconstruction of Elephant Trunk Musculature}, volume = {33}, journal = {Current Biology}, doi = {10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.007}, pages = {1 -- 8}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The elephant trunk operates as a muscular hydrostat and is actuated by the most complex musculature known in animals. Because the number of trunk muscles is unclear, we performed dense reconstructions of trunk muscle fascicles, elementary muscle units, from microCT scans of an Asian baby elephant trunk. Muscle architecture changes markedly across the trunk. Trunk tip and finger consist of about 8,000 extraordinarily filigree fascicles. The dexterous finger consists exclusively of microscopic radial fascicles pointing to a role of muscle miniaturization in elephant dexterity. Radial fascicles also predominate (at 82\% volume) the remainder of the trunk tip and we wonder if radial muscle fascicles are of particular significance for fine motor control of the dexterous trunk tip. By volume, trunk-shaft muscles comprise one-third of the numerous, small radial muscle fascicles, two-thirds of the three subtypes of large longitudinal fascicles (dorsal longitudinals, ventral outer obliques, and ventral inner obliques), and a small fraction of transversal fascicles. Shaft musculature is laterally, but not radially, symmetric. A predominance of dorsal over ventral radial muscles and of ventral over dorsal longitudinal muscles may result in a larger ability of the shaft to extend dorsally than ventrally and to bend inward rather than outward. There are around 90,000 trunk muscle fascicles. While primate hand control is based on fine control of contraction by the convergence of many motor neurons on a small set of relatively large muscles, evolution of elephant grasping has led to thousands of microscopic fascicles, which probably outnumber facial motor neurons.}, language = {en} } @article{EigenWoelferBaumetal.2024, author = {Eigen, Lennart and W{\"o}lfer, Jan and Baum, Daniel and Van Le, Mai-Lee and Werner, Daniel and Dean, Mason N. and Nyakatura, John A.}, title = {Comparative architecture of the tessellated boxfish (Ostracioidea) carapace}, volume = {7}, journal = {Communications Biology}, doi = {10.1038/s42003-024-07119-z}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @article{EigenBaumDeanetal.2022, author = {Eigen, Lennart and Baum, Daniel and Dean, Mason N. and Werner, Daniel and W{\"o}lfer, Jan and Nyakatura, John A.}, title = {Ontogeny of a tessellated surface: carapace growth of the longhorn cowfish Lactoria cornuta}, volume = {241}, journal = {Journal of Anatomy}, number = {3}, publisher = {Wiley}, doi = {10.1111/joa.13692}, pages = {565 -- 580}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Biological armors derive their mechanical integrity in part from their geometric architectures, often involving tessellations: individual structural elements tiled together to form surface shells. The carapace of boxfish, for example, is comprised of mineralized polygonal plates, called scutes, arranged in a complex geometric pattern and nearly completely encasing the body. In contrast to artificial armors, the boxfish exoskeleton grows with the fish; the relationship between the tessellation and the gross structure of the armor is therefore critical to sustained protection throughout growth. To clarify whether or how the boxfish tessellation is maintained or altered with age, we quantify architectural aspects of the tessellated carapace of the longhorn cowfish Lactoria cornuta through ontogeny (across nearly an order of magnitude in standard length) and in a high-throughput fashion, using high-resolution microCT data and segmentation algorithms to characterize the hundreds of scutes that cover each individual. We show that carapace growth is canalized with little variability across individuals: rather than continually adding scutes to enlarge the carapace surface, the number of scutes is surprisingly constant, with scutes increasing in volume, thickness, and especially width with age. As cowfish and their scutes grow, scutes become comparatively thinner, with the scutes at the edges (weak points in a boxy architecture) being some of the thickest and most reinforced in younger animals and thinning most slowly across ontogeny. In contrast, smaller scutes with more variable curvature were found in the limited areas of more complex topology (e.g. around fin insertions, mouth, and anus). Measurements of Gaussian and mean curvature illustrate that cowfish are essentially tessellated boxes throughout life: predominantly zero curvature surfaces comprised of mostly flat scutes, and with scutes with sharp bends used sparingly to form box edges. Since growth of a curved, tiled surface with a fixed number of tiles would require tile restructuring to accommodate the surface's changing radius of curvature, our results therefore illustrate a previously unappreciated advantage of the odd boxfish morphology: by having predominantly flat surfaces, it is the box-like body form that in fact permits a relatively straightforward growth system of this tessellated architecture (i.e. where material is added to scute edges). Our characterization of the ontogeny and maintenance of the carapace tessellation provides insights into the potentially conflicting mechanical, geometric and developmental constraints of this species, but also perspectives into natural strategies for constructing mutable tiled architectures.}, language = {en} } @article{EigenLadenburgerBrenceetal.2025, author = {Eigen, Lennart and Ladenburger, Pius and Brence, Blaž and Shubitidze, Ani and Baum, Daniel and Hildebrandt, Thomas and Brecht, Michael}, title = {Elephant trunk tip musculature reflects species differences in grasping behavior}, volume = {8}, journal = {Communications Biology}, doi = {10.1038/s42003-025-08998-6}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Elephants use their trunks, muscular hydrostats, to perform a plethora of tasks. Trunk tip morphology as well as grasping behavior differ between elephant species. While African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) use their dorsal and ventral finger for pinching movements, Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) prefer to wrap around objects with their one dorsal finger and ventral bulb trunk tip lip. Moreover, E. maximus can flip their ventral bulb backwards to clamp objects behind the trunk tip. Whether trunk tip musculature differs between elephant species and muscle architecture is reflected by preferred grasping behavior is, however, not clear. In this study, we performed dense muscle fascicle reconstruction of three L. africana and three E. maximus hemi-trunk tips using a combination of manual and automated segmentation of high-resolution microfocus tomography (microCT) scans. We distinguish three types of muscle fascicles: longitudinal (bending and shortening), radial (elongating) and transversal muscle fascicles (elongating). We found that trunk tips of L. africana consist to one third of longitudinal and two thirds radial/transversal muscle fascicles, likely aiding in their grasping behavior, while E. maximus trunk tips consist to two thirds of longitudinal and one third radial/transversal muscle fascicles, which is advantageous for their wrapping and backward clamping behavior.}, language = {en} }