@article{KochBernalNeiraChenetal.2025, author = {Koch, Thorsten and Bernal Neira, David E. and Chen, Ying and Cortiana, Giorgio and Egger, Daniel J. and Heese, Raoul and Hegade, Narendra N. and Gomez Cadavid, Alejandro and Huang, Rhea and Itoko, Toshinari and Kleinert, Thomas and Maciel Xavier, Pedro and Mohseni, Naeimeh and Montanez-Barrera, Jhon A. and Nakano, Koji and Nannicini, Giacomo and O'Meara, Corey and Pauckert, Justin and Proissl, Manuel and Ramesh, Anurag and Schicker, Maximilian and Shimada, Noriaki and Takeori, Mitsuharu and Valls, Victor and Van Bulck, David and Woerner, Stefan and Zoufal, Christa}, title = {Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library -- The Intractable Decathlon}, arxiv = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03832}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Through recent progress in hardware development, quantum computers have advanced to the point where benchmarking of (heuristic) quantum algorithms at scale is within reach. Particularly in combinatorial optimization -- where most algorithms are heuristics -- it is key to empirically analyze their performance on hardware and track progress towards quantum advantage. To this extent, we present ten optimization problem classes that are difficult for existing classical algorithms and can (mostly) be linked to practically-relevant applications, with the goal to enable systematic, fair, and comparable benchmarks for quantum optimization methods. Further, we introduce the Quantum Optimization Benchmark Library (QOBLIB) where the problem instances and solution track records can be found. The individual properties of the problem classes vary in terms of objective and variable type, coefficient ranges, and density. Crucially, they all become challenging for established classical methods already at system sizes ranging from less than 100 to, at most, an order of 100,000 decision variables, allowing to approach them with today's quantum computers. We reference the results from state-of-the-art solvers for instances from all problem classes and demonstrate exemplary baseline results obtained with quantum solvers for selected problems. The baseline results illustrate a standardized form to present benchmarking solutions, which has been designed to ensure comparability of the used methods, reproducibility of the respective results, and trackability of algorithmic and hardware improvements over time. We encourage the optimization community to explore the performance of available classical or quantum algorithms and hardware platforms with the benchmarking problem instances presented in this work toward demonstrating quantum advantage in optimization.}, language = {en} } @article{AbbasAmbainisAugustinoetal.2024, author = {Abbas, Amira and Ambainis, Andris and Augustino, Brandon and B{\"a}rtschi, Andreas and Buhrman, Harry and Coffrin, Carleton and Cortiana, Giorgio and Dunjko, Vedran and Egger, Daniel J. and Elmegreen, Bruce G. and Franco, Nicola and Fratini, Filippo and Fuller, Bryce and Gacon, Julien and Gonciulea, Constantin and Gribling, Sander and Gupta, Swati and Hadfield, Stuart and Heese, Raoul and Kircher, Gerhard and Kleinert, Thomas and Koch, Thorsten and Korpas, Georgios and Lenk, Steve and Marecek, Jakub and Markov, Vanio and Mazzola, Guglielmo and Mensa, Stefano and Mohseni, Naeimeh and Nannicini, Giacomo and O'Meara, Corey and Tapia, Elena Pe{\~n}a and Pokutta, Sebastian and Proissl, Manuel and Rebentrost, Patrick and Sahin, Emre and Symons, Benjamin C. B. and Tornow, Sabine and Valls, V{\´i}ctor and Woerner, Stefan and Wolf-Bauwens, Mira L. and Yard, Jon and Yarkoni, Sheir and Zechiel, Dirk and Zhuk, Sergiy and Zoufal, Christa}, title = {Challenges and opportunities in quantum optimization}, volume = {6}, journal = {Nature Reviews Physics}, publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, issn = {2522-5820}, arxiv = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02279}, doi = {10.1038/s42254-024-00770-9}, pages = {718 -- 735}, year = {2024}, language = {en} }