@misc{OatesCockaynePrangleetal., author = {Oates, Chris and Cockayne, Jon and Prangle, Dennis and Sullivan, T. J. and Girolami, Mark}, title = {Optimality criteria for probabilistic numerical methods}, series = {Multivariate Algorithms and Information-Based Complexity}, volume = {27}, journal = {Multivariate Algorithms and Information-Based Complexity}, editor = {Hickernell, F. J. and Kritzer, P.}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, doi = {10.1515/9783110635461-005}, pages = {65 -- 88}, abstract = {It is well understood that Bayesian decision theory and average case analysis are essentially identical. However, if one is interested in performing uncertainty quantification for a numerical task, it can be argued that the decision-theoretic framework is neither appropriate nor sufficient. To this end, we consider an alternative optimality criterion from Bayesian experimental design and study its implied optimal information in the numerical context. This information is demonstrated to differ, in general, from the information that would be used in an average-case-optimal numerical method. The explicit connection to Bayesian experimental design suggests several distinct regimes in which optimal probabilistic numerical methods can be developed.}, language = {en} } @article{WangCockayneChkrebtiietal., author = {Wang, Junyang and Cockayne, Jon and Chkrebtii, Oksana and Sullivan, T. J. and Oates, Chris}, title = {Bayesian numerical methods for nonlinear partial differential equations}, series = {Statistics and Computing}, volume = {31}, journal = {Statistics and Computing}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1007/s11222-021-10030-w}, language = {en} }