@inproceedings{WitzigBertholdHeinz, author = {Witzig, Jakob and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan}, title = {A Status Report on Conflict Analysis in Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming}, series = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2019}, volume = {11494}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2019}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-19212-9_6}, pages = {84 -- 94}, abstract = {Mixed integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) are arguably among the hardest optimization problems, with a wide range of applications. MINLP solvers that are based on linear relaxations and spatial branching work similar as mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers in the sense that they are based on a branch-and-cut algorithm, enhanced by various heuristics, domain propagation, and presolving techniques. However, the analysis of infeasible subproblems, which is an important component of most major MIP solvers, has been hardly studied in the context of MINLPs. There are two main approaches for infeasibility analysis in MIP solvers: conflict graph analysis, which originates from artificial intelligence and constraint programming, and dual ray analysis. The main contribution of this short paper is twofold. Firstly, we present the first computational study regarding the impact of dual ray analysis on convex and nonconvex MINLPs. In that context, we introduce a modified generation of infeasibility proofs that incorporates linearization cuts that are only locally valid. Secondly, we describe an extension of conflict analysis that works directly with the nonlinear relaxation of convex MINLPs instead of considering a linear relaxation. This is work-in-progress, and this short paper is meant to present first theoretical considerations without a computational study for that part.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BertholdStuckeyWitzig, author = {Berthold, Timo and Stuckey, Peter and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {Local Rapid Learning for Integer Programs}, series = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2019}, volume = {11494}, booktitle = {Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2019}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-19212-9_5}, pages = {67 -- 83}, abstract = {Conflict learning algorithms are an important component of modern MIP and CP solvers. But strong conflict information is typically gained by depth-first search. While this is the natural mode for CP solving, it is not for MIP solving. Rapid Learning is a hybrid CP/MIP approach where CP search is applied at the root to learn information to support the remaining MIP solve. This has been demonstrated to be beneficial for binary programs. In this paper, we extend the idea of Rapid Learning to integer programs, where not all variables are restricted to the domain {0, 1}, and rather than just running a rapid CP search at the root, we will apply it repeatedly at local search nodes within the MIP search tree. To do so efficiently, we present six heuristic criteria to predict the chance for local Rapid Learning to be successful. Our computational experiments indicate that our extended Rapid Learning algorithm significantly speeds up MIP search and is particularly beneficial on highly dual degenerate problems.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MexiBertholdGleixneretal., author = {Mexi, Gioni and Berthold, Timo and Gleixner, Ambros and Nordstr{\"o}m, Jakob}, title = {Improving Conflict Analysis in MIP Solvers by Pseudo-Boolean Reasoning}, series = {29th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2023)}, volume = {280}, booktitle = {29th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2023)}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2023.27}, pages = {27:1 -- 27:19}, abstract = {Conflict analysis has been successfully generalized from Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving to mixed integer programming (MIP) solvers, but although MIP solvers operate with general linear inequalities, the conflict analysis in MIP has been limited to reasoning with the more restricted class of clausal constraint. This is in contrast to how conflict analysis is performed in so-called pseudo-Boolean solving, where solvers can reason directly with 0-1 integer linear inequalities rather than with clausal constraints extracted from such inequalities. In this work, we investigate how pseudo-Boolean conflict analysis can be integrated in MIP solving, focusing on 0-1 integer linear programs (0-1 ILPs). Phrased in MIP terminology, conflict analysis can be understood as a sequence of linear combinations and cuts. We leverage this perspective to design a new conflict analysis algorithm based on mixed integer rounding (MIR) cuts, which theoretically dominates the state-of-the-art division-based method in pseudo-Boolean solving. We also report results from a first proof-of-concept implementation of different pseudo-Boolean conflict analysis methods in the open-source MIP solver SCIP. When evaluated on a large and diverse set of 0-1 ILP instances from MIPLIB2017, our new MIR-based conflict analysis outperforms both previous pseudo-Boolean methods and the clause-based method used in MIP. Our conclusion is that pseudo-Boolean conflict analysis in MIP is a promising research direction that merits further study, and that it might also make sense to investigate the use of such conflict analysis to generate stronger no-goods in constraint programming.}, language = {en} } @misc{TurnerBertholdBesancon, author = {Turner, Mark and Berthold, Timo and Besan{\c{c}}on, Mathieu}, title = {A Context-Aware Cutting Plane Selection Algorithm for Mixed-Integer Programming}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-91691}, abstract = {The current cut selection algorithm used in mixed-integer programming solvers has remained largely unchanged since its creation. In this paper, we propose a set of new cut scoring measures, cut filtering techniques, and stopping criteria, extending the current state-of-the-art algorithm and obtaining a 5\\% performance improvement for SCIP over the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark set.}, language = {en} } @misc{TurnerBertholdBesanconetal., author = {Turner, Mark and Berthold, Timo and Besan{\c{c}}on, Mathieu and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Cutting Plane Selection with Analytic Centers and Multiregression}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-89065}, abstract = {Cutting planes are a crucial component of state-of-the-art mixed-integer programming solvers, with the choice of which subset of cuts to add being vital for solver performance. We propose new distance-based measures to qualify the value of a cut by quantifying the extent to which it separates relevant parts of the relaxed feasible set. For this purpose, we use the analytic centers of the relaxation polytope or of its optimal face, as well as alternative optimal solutions of the linear programming relaxation. We assess the impact of the choice of distance measure on root node performance and throughout the whole branch-and-bound tree, comparing our measures against those prevalent in the literature. Finally, by a multi-output regression, we predict the relative performance of each measure, using static features readily available before the separation process. Our results indicate that analytic center-based methods help to significantly reduce the number of branch-and-bound nodes needed to explore the search space and that our multiregression approach can further improve on any individual method.}, language = {en} } @misc{TurnerBertholdBesanconetal., author = {Turner, Mark and Berthold, Timo and Besan{\c{c}}on, Mathieu and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Branching via Cutting Plane Selection: Improving Hybrid Branching}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-91120}, abstract = {Cutting planes and branching are two of the most important algorithms for solving mixed-integer linear programs. For both algorithms, disjunctions play an important role, being used both as branching candidates and as the foundation for some cutting planes. We relate branching decisions and cutting planes to each other through the underlying disjunctions that they are based on, with a focus on Gomory mixed-integer cuts and their corresponding split disjunctions. We show that selecting branching decisions based on quality measures of Gomory mixed-integer cuts leads to relatively small branch-and-bound trees, and that the result improves when using cuts that more accurately represent the branching decisions. Finally, we show how the history of previously computed Gomory mixed-integer cuts can be used to improve the performance of the state-of-the-art hybrid branching rule of SCIP. Our results show a 4\% decrease in solve time, and an 8\% decrease in number of nodes over affected instances of MIPLIB 2017.}, language = {en} } @article{TurnerBertholdBesanconetal., author = {Turner, Mark and Berthold, Timo and Besan{\c{c}}on, Mathieu and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Branching via Cutting Plane Selection: Improving Hybrid Branching}, publisher = {Springer}, abstract = {Cutting planes and branching are two of the most important algorithms for solving mixed-integer linear programs. For both algorithms, disjunctions play an important role, being used both as branching candidates and as the foundation for some cutting planes. We relate branching decisions and cutting planes to each other through the underlying disjunctions that they are based on, with a focus on Gomory mixed-integer cuts and their corresponding split disjunctions. We show that selecting branching decisions based on quality measures of Gomory mixed-integer cuts leads to relatively small branch-and-bound trees, and that the result improves when using cuts that more accurately represent the branching decisions. Finally, we show how the history of previously computed Gomory mixed-integer cuts can be used to improve the performance of the state-of-the-art hybrid branching rule of SCIP. Our results show a \$4\\%\$ decrease in solve time, and an \$8\\%\$ decrease in number of nodes over affected instances of MIPLIB 2017.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{TurnerBertholdBesancon, author = {Turner, Mark and Berthold, Timo and Besan{\c{c}}on, Mathieu}, title = {A Context-Aware Cutting Plane Selection Algorithm for Mixed-Integer Programming}, abstract = {The current cut selection algorithm used in mixed-integer programming solvers has remained largely unchanged since its creation. In this paper, we propose a set of new cut scoring measures, cut filtering techniques, and stopping criteria, extending the current state-of-the-art algorithm and obtaining a 5\\% performance improvement for SCIP over the MIPLIB 2017 benchmark set.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{TurnerBertholdBesanconetal., author = {Turner, Mark and Berthold, Timo and Besan{\c{c}}on, Mathieu and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {Cutting Plane Selection with Analytic Centers and Multiregression}, series = {Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research. CPAIOR 2023.}, volume = {13884}, booktitle = {Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research. CPAIOR 2023.}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-33271-5_4}, pages = {52 -- 68}, abstract = {Cutting planes are a crucial component of state-of-the-art mixed-integer programming solvers, with the choice of which subset of cuts to add being vital for solver performance. We propose new distance-based measures to qualify the value of a cut by quantifying the extent to which it separates relevant parts of the relaxed feasible set. For this purpose, we use the analytic centers of the relaxation polytope or of its optimal face, as well as alternative optimal solutions of the linear programming relaxation. We assess the impact of the choice of distance measure on root node performance and throughout the whole branch-and-bound tree, comparing our measures against those prevalent in the literature. Finally, by a multi-output regression, we predict the relative performance of each measure, using static features readily available before the separation process. Our results indicate that analytic center-based methods help to significantly reduce the number of branch-and-bound nodes needed to explore the search space and that our multiregression approach can further improve on any individual method.}, language = {en} }