@misc{HillerVredeveld, author = {Hiller, Benjamin and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {On the optimality of Least Recently Used}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-10928}, number = {08-39}, abstract = {It is well known that competitive analysis yields too pessimistic results when applied to the paging problem and it also cannot make a distinction between many paging strategies. Many deterministic paging algorithms achieve the same competitive ratio, ranging from inefficient strategies as flush-when-full to the good performing least-recently-used (LRU). In this paper, we study this fundamental online problem from the viewpoint of stochastic dominance. We show that when sequences are drawn from distributions modelling locality of reference, LRU is stochastically better than any other online paging algorithm.}, language = {en} } @misc{HillerVredeveld, author = {Hiller, Benjamin and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {Probabilistic analysis of Online Bin Coloring algorithms via Stochastic Comparison}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-10726}, number = {08-18}, abstract = {This paper proposes a new method for probabilistic analysis of online algorithms that is based on the notion of stochastic dominance. We develop the method for the Online Bin Coloring problem introduced by Krumke et al. Using methods for the stochastic comparison of Markov chains we establish the strong result that the performance of the online algorithm GreedyFit is stochastically dominated by the performance of the algorithm OneBin for any number of items processed. This result gives a more realistic picture than competitive analysis and explains the behavior observed in simulations.}, language = {en} } @misc{HillerVredeveld, author = {Hiller, Benjamin and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {Probabilistic alternatives for competitive analysis}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/s00450-011-0149-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-15131}, abstract = {In the last 20 years competitive analysis has become the main tool for analyzing the quality of online algorithms. Despite of this, competitive analysis has also been criticized: It sometimes cannot discriminate between algorithms that exhibit significantly different empirical behavior, or it even favors an algorithm that is worse from an empirical point of view. Therefore, there have been several approaches to circumvent these drawbacks. In this survey, we discuss probabilistic alternatives for competitive analysis.}, language = {en} }