@misc{MuellerKuhlmannVigerske, author = {M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Kuhlmann, Renke and Vigerske, Stefan}, title = {On the performance of NLP solvers within global MINLP solvers}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-89920-6_84}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-64504}, abstract = {Solving mixed-integer nonlinear programs (MINLPs) to global optimality efficiently requires fast solvers for continuous sub-problems. These appear in, e.g., primal heuristics, convex relaxations, and bound tightening methods. Two of the best performing algorithms for these sub-problems are Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) and Interior Point Methods. In this paper we study the impact of different SQP and Interior Point implementations on important MINLP solver components that solve a sequence of similar NLPs. We use the constraint integer programming framework SCIP for our computational studies.}, language = {en} } @article{BernalVigerskeTrespalaciosetal., author = {Bernal, David E. and Vigerske, Stefan and Trespalacios, Francisco and Grossmann, Ignacio E.}, title = {Improving the performance of DICOPT in convex MINLP problems using a feasibility pump}, series = {Optimization Methods and Software}, journal = {Optimization Methods and Software}, abstract = {The solver DICOPT is based on an outer-approximation algorithm used for solving mixed- integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problems. This algorithm is very effective for solving some types of convex MINLPs. However, there are certain problems that are diffcult to solve with this algorithm. One of these problems is when the nonlinear constraints are so restrictive that the nonlinear subproblems produced by the algorithm are infeasible. This problem is addressed in this paper with a feasibility pump algorithm, which modifies the objective function in order to efficiently find feasible solutions. It has been implemented as a preprocessing algorithm for DICOPT. Computational comparisons with previous versions of DICOPT and other MINLP solvers on a set of convex MINLPs demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in terms of solution quality and solving time.}, language = {en} } @misc{GleixnerEiflerGallyetal., author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Eifler, Leon and Gally, Tristan and Gamrath, Gerald and Gemander, Patrick and Gottwald, Robert Lion and Hendel, Gregor and Hojny, Christopher and Koch, Thorsten and Miltenberger, Matthias and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Puchert, Christian and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Schl{\"o}sser, Franziska and Serrano, Felipe and Shinano, Yuji and Viernickel, Jan Merlin and Vigerske, Stefan and Weninger, Dieter and Witt, Jonas T. and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {The SCIP Optimization Suite 5.0}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-66297}, abstract = {This article describes new features and enhanced algorithms made available in version 5.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. In its central component, the constraint integer programming solver SCIP, remarkable performance improvements have been achieved for solving mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programs. On MIPs, SCIP 5.0 is about 41 \% faster than SCIP 4.0 and over twice as fast on instances that take at least 100 seconds to solve. For MINLP, SCIP 5.0 is about 17 \% faster overall and 23 \% faster on instances that take at least 100 seconds to solve. This boost is due to algorithmic advances in several parts of the solver such as cutting plane generation and management, a new adaptive coordination of large neighborhood search heuristics, symmetry handling, and strengthened McCormick relaxations for bilinear terms in MINLPs. Besides discussing the theoretical background and the implementational aspects of these developments, the report describes recent additions for the other software packages connected to SCIP, in particular for the LP solver SoPlex, the Steiner tree solver SCIP-Jack, the MISDP solver SCIP-SDP, and the parallelization framework UG.}, language = {en} }