@misc{GamrathAndersonBestuzhevaetal.2020, author = {Gamrath, Gerald and Anderson, Daniel and Bestuzheva, Ksenia and Chen, Wei-Kun and Eifler, Leon and Gasse, Maxime and Gemander, Patrick and Gleixner, Ambros and Gottwald, Leona and Halbig, Katrin and Hendel, Gregor and Hojny, Christopher and Koch, Thorsten and Le Bodic, Pierre and Maher, Stephen J. and Matter, Frederic and Miltenberger, Matthias and M{\"u}hmer, Erik and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Schl{\"o}sser, Franziska and Serrano, Felipe and Shinano, Yuji and Tawfik, Christine and Vigerske, Stefan and Wegscheider, Fabian and Weninger, Dieter and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {The SCIP Optimization Suite 7.0}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78023}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming frame- work SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 7.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. The new version features the parallel presolving library PaPILO as a new addition to the suite. PaPILO 1.0 simplifies mixed-integer linear op- timization problems and can be used stand-alone or integrated into SCIP via a presolver plugin. SCIP 7.0 provides additional support for decomposition algorithms. Besides im- provements in the Benders' decomposition solver of SCIP, user-defined decomposition structures can be read, which are used by the automated Benders' decomposition solver and two primal heuristics. Additionally, SCIP 7.0 comes with a tree size estimation that is used to predict the completion of the overall solving process and potentially trigger restarts. Moreover, substantial performance improvements of the MIP core were achieved by new developments in presolving, primal heuristics, branching rules, conflict analysis, and symmetry handling. Last, not least, the report presents updates to other components and extensions of the SCIP Optimization Suite, in particular, the LP solver SoPlex and the mixed-integer semidefinite programming solver SCIP-SDP.}, language = {en} } @misc{HendelAndersonLeBodicetal.2020, author = {Hendel, Gregor and Anderson, Daniel and Le Bodic, Pierre and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Estimating the Size of Branch-And-Bound Trees}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-78144}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This paper investigates the estimation of the size of Branch-and-Bound (B\&B) trees for solving mixed-integer programs. We first prove that the size of the B\&B tree cannot be approximated within a factor of~2 for general binary programs, unless P equals NP. Second, we review measures of the progress of the B\&B search, such as the gap, and propose a new measure, which we call leaf frequency. We study two simple ways to transform these progress measures into B\&B tree size estimates, either as a direct projection, or via double-exponential smoothing, a standard time-series forecasting technique. We then combine different progress measures and their trends into nontrivial estimates using Machine Learning techniques, which yields more precise estimates than any individual measure. The best method we have identified uses all individual measures as features of a random forest model. In a large computational study, we train and validate all methods on the publicly available MIPLIB and Coral general purpose benchmark sets. On average, the best method estimates B\&B tree sizes within a factor of 3 on the set of unseen test instances even during the early stage of the search, and improves in accuracy as the search progresses. It also achieves a factor 2 over the entire search on each out of six additional sets of homogeneous instances we have tested. All techniques are available in version 7 of the branch-and-cut framework SCIP.}, language = {en} } @article{BorndoerferKarbsteinPfetsch2012, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Karbstein, Marika and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Models for Fare Planning in Public Transport}, volume = {160}, journal = {Discrete Applied Mathematics}, number = {18}, doi = {10.1016/j.dam.2012.02.027}, pages = {2591 -- 2605}, year = {2012}, language = {en} } @misc{GleixnerEiflerGallyetal.2017, author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Eifler, Leon and Gally, Tristan and Gamrath, Gerald and Gemander, Patrick and Gottwald, Robert Lion and Hendel, Gregor and Hojny, Christopher and Koch, Thorsten and Miltenberger, Matthias and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Puchert, Christian and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Schl{\"o}sser, Franziska and Serrano, Felipe and Shinano, Yuji and Viernickel, Jan Merlin and Vigerske, Stefan and Weninger, Dieter and Witt, Jonas T. and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {The SCIP Optimization Suite 5.0}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-66297}, year = {2017}, abstract = {This article describes new features and enhanced algorithms made available in version 5.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. In its central component, the constraint integer programming solver SCIP, remarkable performance improvements have been achieved for solving mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programs. On MIPs, SCIP 5.0 is about 41 \% faster than SCIP 4.0 and over twice as fast on instances that take at least 100 seconds to solve. For MINLP, SCIP 5.0 is about 17 \% faster overall and 23 \% faster on instances that take at least 100 seconds to solve. This boost is due to algorithmic advances in several parts of the solver such as cutting plane generation and management, a new adaptive coordination of large neighborhood search heuristics, symmetry handling, and strengthened McCormick relaxations for bilinear terms in MINLPs. Besides discussing the theoretical background and the implementational aspects of these developments, the report describes recent additions for the other software packages connected to SCIP, in particular for the LP solver SoPlex, the Steiner tree solver SCIP-Jack, the MISDP solver SCIP-SDP, and the parallelization framework UG.}, language = {en} } @article{KochSchmidtHilleretal.2020, author = {Koch, Thorsten and Schmidt, Martin and Hiller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Geißler, Bj{\"o}rn and Henrion, Ren{\´e} and Joormann, Imke and Martin, Alexander and Morsi, Antonio and R{\"o}misch, Werner and Schewe, Lars and Schultz, R{\"u}diger}, title = {Capacity Evaluation for Large-Scale Gas Networks}, volume = {35}, journal = {German Success Stories in Industrial Mathematics}, isbn = {978-3-030-81454-0}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-81455-7}, pages = {23 -- 28}, year = {2020}, language = {en} } @misc{GleixnerBastubbeEifleretal.2018, author = {Gleixner, Ambros and Bastubbe, Michael and Eifler, Leon and Gally, Tristan and Gamrath, Gerald and Gottwald, Robert Lion and Hendel, Gregor and Hojny, Christopher and Koch, Thorsten and L{\"u}bbecke, Marco and Maher, Stephen J. and Miltenberger, Matthias and M{\"u}ller, Benjamin and Pfetsch, Marc and Puchert, Christian and Rehfeldt, Daniel and Schl{\"o}sser, Franziska and Schubert, Christoph and Serrano, Felipe and Shinano, Yuji and Viernickel, Jan Merlin and Walter, Matthias and Wegscheider, Fabian and Witt, Jonas T. and Witzig, Jakob}, title = {The SCIP Optimization Suite 6.0}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-69361}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming framework SCIP. This paper discusses enhancements and extensions contained in version 6.0 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. Besides performance improvements of the MIP and MINLP core achieved by new primal heuristics and a new selection criterion for cutting planes, one focus of this release are decomposition algorithms. Both SCIP and the automatic decomposition solver GCG now include advanced functionality for performing Benders' decomposition in a generic framework. GCG's detection loop for structured matrices and the coordination of pricing routines for Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition has been significantly revised for greater flexibility. Two SCIP extensions have been added to solve the recursive circle packing problem by a problem-specific column generation scheme and to demonstrate the use of the new Benders' framework for stochastic capacitated facility location. Last, not least, the report presents updates and additions to the other components and extensions of the SCIP Optimization Suite: the LP solver SoPlex, the modeling language Zimpl, the parallelization framework UG, the Steiner tree solver SCIP-Jack, and the mixed-integer semidefinite programming solver SCIP-SDP.}, language = {en} } @misc{BorndoerferGroetschelPfetsch2004, author = {Bornd{\"o}rfer, Ralf and Gr{\"o}tschel, Martin and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Models for Line Planning in Public Transport}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-540-73312-6_18}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-7854}, number = {04-10}, year = {2004}, abstract = {The \emph{line planning problem} is one of the fundamental problems in strategic planning of public and rail transport. It consists of finding lines and corresponding frequencies in a public transport network such that a given travel demand can be satisfied. There are (at least) two objectives. The transport company wishes to minimize its operating cost; the passengers request short travel times. We propose two new multi-commodity flow models for line planning. Their main features, in comparison to existing models, are that the passenger paths can be freely routed and that the lines are generated dynamically.}, language = {en} } @misc{Pfetsch2005, author = {Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {A Branch-And-Cut for the Maximum Feasible Subsystem Problem}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-8797}, number = {05-46}, year = {2005}, abstract = {We present a branch-and-cut algorithm for the NP-hard maximum feasible subsystem problem: For a given infeasible linear inequality system, determine a feasible subsystem containing as many inequalities as possible. The complementary problem, where one has to remove as few inequalities as possible in order to render the system feasible, can be formulated as a set covering problem. The rows of this formulation correspond to irreducible infeasible subsystems, which can be exponentially many. The main issue of a branch-and-cut algorithm for MaxFS is to efficiently find such infeasible subsystems. We present three heuristics for the corresponding NP-hard separation problem and discuss further cutting planes. This paper contains an extensive computational study of our implementation on a variety of instances arising in a number of applications.}, language = {en} } @misc{HarksHeinzPfetsch2006, author = {Harks, Tobias and Heinz, Stefan and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Competitive Online Multicommodity Routing}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-9212}, number = {06-27}, year = {2006}, abstract = {We study online multicommodity minimum cost routing problems in networks, where commodities have to be routed sequentially. Arcs are equipped with load dependent price functions defining the routing weights. We discuss an online algorithm that routes each commodity by minimizing a convex cost function that depends on the demands that are previously routed. We present a competitive analysis of this algorithm showing that for affine linear price functions this algorithm is \$4K/2+K\$-competitive, where \$K\$ is the number of commodities. For the parallel arc case this algorithm is optimal. Without restrictions on the price functions and network, no algorithm is competitive. Finally, we investigate a variant in which the demands have to be routed unsplittably.}, language = {en} } @misc{HarksHeinzPfetsch2007, author = {Harks, Tobias and Heinz, Stefan and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Competitive Online Multicommodity Routing}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-9599}, number = {07-16}, year = {2007}, abstract = {In this paper we study online multicommodity routing problems in networks, in which commodities have to be routed sequentially. The flow of each commodity can be split on several paths. Arcs are equipped with load dependent price functions defining routing costs, which have to be minimized. We discuss a greedy online algorithm that routes each commodity by minimizing a convex cost function that only depends on the demands previously routed. We present a competitive analysis of this algorithm showing that for affine linear price functions this algorithm is 4K2 (1+K)2 -competitive, where K is the number of commodities. For the single-source single-destination case, this algorithm is optimal. Without restrictions on the price functions and network, no algorithm is competitive. Finally, we investigate a variant in which the demands have to be routed unsplittably.}, language = {en} }