@misc{HeinzKrumkeMegowetal., author = {Heinz, Stefan and Krumke, Sven and Megow, Nicole and Rambau, J{\"o}rg and Tuchscherer, Andreas and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {The Online Target Date Assignment Problem}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-8945}, number = {05-61}, abstract = {Many online problems encountered in real-life involve a two-stage decision process: upon arrival of a new request, an irrevocable first-stage decision (the assignment of a specific resource to the request) must be made immediately, while in a second stage process, certain ``subinstances'' (that is, the instances of all requests assigned to a particular resource) can be solved to optimality (offline) later. We introduce the novel concept of an \emph{Online Target Date Assignment Problem} (\textsc{OnlineTDAP}) as a general framework for online problems with this nature. Requests for the \textsc{OnlineTDAP} become known at certain dates. An online algorithm has to assign a target date to each request, specifying on which date the request should be processed (e.\,g., an appointment with a customer for a washing machine repair). The cost at a target date is given by the \emph{downstream cost}, the optimal cost of processing all requests at that date w.\,r.\,t.\ some fixed downstream offline optimization problem (e.\,g., the cost of an optimal dispatch for service technicians). We provide general competitive algorithms for the \textsc{OnlineTDAP} independently of the particular downstream problem, when the overall objective is to minimize either the sum or the maximum of all downstream costs. As the first basic examples, we analyze the competitive ratios of our algorithms for the par ticular academic downstream problems of bin-packing, nonpreemptive scheduling on identical parallel machines, and routing a traveling salesman.}, language = {en} } @misc{Heinz, type = {Master Thesis}, author = {Heinz, Stefan}, title = {Policies for Online Target Date Assignment Problems: Competitive Analysis versus Expected Performance}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-9933}, school = {Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB)}, language = {en} } @misc{HarksHeinzPfetschetal., author = {Harks, Tobias and Heinz, Stefan and Pfetsch, Marc and Vredeveld, Tjark}, title = {Online Multicommodity Routing with Time Windows}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-9654}, number = {07-22}, abstract = {We consider a multicommodity routing problem, where demands are released \emph{online} and have to be routed in a network during specified time windows. The objective is to minimize a time and load dependent convex cost function of the aggregate arc flow. First, we study the fractional routing variant. We present two online algorithms, called Seq and Seq\$^2\$. Our first main result states that, for cost functions defined by polynomial price functions with nonnegative coefficients and maximum degree~\$d\$, the competitive ratio of Seq and Seq\$^2\$ is at most \$(d+1)^{d+1}\$, which is tight. We also present lower bounds of \$(0.265\,(d+1))^{d+1}\$ for any online algorithm. In the case of a network with two nodes and parallel arcs, we prove a lower bound of \$(2-\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{3})\$ on the competitive ratio for Seq and Seq\$^2\$, even for affine linear price functions. Furthermore, we study resource augmentation, where the online algorithm has to route less demand than the offline adversary. Second, we consider unsplittable routings. For this setting, we present two online algorithms, called U-Seq and U-Seq\$^2\$. We prove that for polynomial price functions with nonnegative coefficients and maximum degree~\$d\$, the competitive ratio of U-Seq and U-Seq\$^2\$ is bounded by \$O{1.77^d\,d^{d+1}}\$. We present lower bounds of \$(0.5307\,(d+1))^{d+1}\$ for any online algorithm and \$(d+1)^{d+1}\$ for our algorithms. Third, we consider a special case of our framework: online load balancing in the \$\ell_p\$-norm. For the fractional and unsplittable variant of this problem, we show that our online algorithms are \$p\$ and \$O{p}\$ competitive, respectively. Such results where previously known only for scheduling jobs on restricted (un)related parallel machines.}, language = {en} } @misc{KochAchterbergAndersenetal.2010, author = {Koch, Thorsten and Achterberg, Tobias and Andersen, Erling and Bastert, Oliver and Berthold, Timo and Bixby, Robert E. and Danna, Emilie and Gamrath, Gerald and Gleixner, Ambros and Heinz, Stefan and Lodi, Andrea and Mittelmann, Hans and Ralphs, Ted and Salvagnin, Domenico and Steffy, Daniel and Wolter, Kati}, title = {MIPLIB 2010}, doi = {10.1007/s12532-011-0025-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12953}, number = {10-31}, year = {2010}, abstract = {This paper reports on the fifth version of the Mixed Integer Programming Library. The MIPLIB 2010 is the first MIPLIB release that has been assembled by a large group from academia and from industry, all of whom work in integer programming. There was mutual consent that the concept of the library had to be expanded in order to fulfill the needs of the community. The new version comprises 361 instances sorted into several groups. This includes the main benchmark test set of 87 instances, which are all solvable by today's codes, and also the challenge test set with 164 instances, many of which are currently unsolved. For the first time, we include scripts to run automated tests in a predefined way. Further, there is a solution checker to test the accuracy of provided solutions using exact arithmetic.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHeinzPfetschetal., author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Pfetsch, Marc and Vigerske, Stefan}, title = {Large Neighborhood Search beyond MIP}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12989}, number = {11-21}, abstract = {Large neighborhood search (LNS) heuristics are an important component of modern branch-and-cut algorithms for solving mixed-integer linear programs (MIPs). Most of these LNS heuristics use the LP relaxation as the basis for their search, which is a reasonable choice in case of MIPs. However, for more general problem classes, the LP relaxation alone may not contain enough information about the original problem to find feasible solutions with these heuristics, e.g., if the problem is nonlinear or not all constraints are present in the current relaxation. In this paper, we discuss a generic way to extend LNS heuristics that have been developed for MIP to constraint integer programming (CIP), which is a generalization of MIP in the direction of constraint programming (CP). We present computational results of LNS heuristics for three problem classes: mixed-integer quadratically constrained programs, nonlinear pseudo-Boolean optimization instances, and resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Therefore, we have implemented extended versions of the following LNS heuristics in the constraint integer programming framework SCIP: Local Branching, RINS, RENS, Crossover, and DINS. Our results indicate that a generic generalization of LNS heuristics to CIP considerably improves the success rate of these heuristics.}, language = {en} } @misc{ShinanoAchterbergBertholdetal., author = {Shinano, Yuji and Achterberg, Tobias and Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Koch, Thorsten}, title = {ParaSCIP - a parallel extension of SCIP}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-24025-6_12}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11921}, number = {10-27}, abstract = {Mixed integer programming (MIP) has become one of the most important techniques in Operations Research and Discrete Optimization. SCIP (Solving Constraint Integer Programs) is currently one of the fastest non-commercial MIP solvers. It is based on the branch-and-bound procedure in which the problem is recursively split into smaller subproblems, thereby creating a so-called branching tree. We present ParaSCIP, an extension of SCIP, which realizes a parallelization on a distributed memory computing environment. ParaSCIP uses SCIP solvers as independently running processes to solve subproblems (nodes of the branching tree) locally. This makes the parallelization development independent of the SCIP development. Thus, ParaSCIP directly profits from any algorithmic progress in future versions of SCIP. Using a first implementation of ParaSCIP, we were able to solve two previously unsolved instances from MIPLIB2003, a standard test set library for MIP solvers. For these computations, we used up to 2048 cores of the HLRN~II supercomputer.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHeinzSchulz, author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Schulz, Jens}, title = {An approximative Criterion for the Potential of Energetic Reasoning}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12655}, number = {11-12}, abstract = {Energetic reasoning is one of the most powerful propagation algorithms in cumulative scheduling. In practice, however, it is not commonly used because it has a high running time and its success highly depends on the tightness of the variable bounds. In order to speed up energetic reasoning, we provide an easy-to-check necessary condition for energetic reasoning to detect infeasibilities. We present an implementation of energetic reasoning that employs this condition and that can be parametrically adjusted to handle the trade-off between solving time and propagation overhead. Computational results on instances from the PSPLIB are provided. These results show that using this condition decreases the running time by more than a half, although more search nodes need to be explored.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzSchulz, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Schulz, Jens}, title = {Explanations for the Cumulative Constraint: an Experimental Study}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12668}, number = {11-13}, abstract = {In cumulative scheduling, conflict analysis seems to be one of the key ingredients to solve such problems efficiently. Thereby, the computational complexity of explanation algorithms plays an important role. Even more when we are faced with a backtracking system where explanations need to be constructed on the fly. In this paper we present extensive computational results to analyze the impact of explanation algorithms for the cumulative constraint in a backward checking system. The considered explanation algorithms differ in their quality and computational complexity. We present results for the domain propagation algorithms time-tabling, edge-finding, and energetic reasoning.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzBeck, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Beck, J. Christopher}, title = {Solving Resource Allocation/Scheduling Problems with Constraint Integer Programming}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12691}, number = {11-14}, abstract = {Constraint Integer Programming (CIP) is a generalization of mixed-integer programming (MIP) in the direction of constraint programming (CP) allowing the inference techniques that have traditionally been the core of \P to be integrated with the problem solving techniques that form the core of complete MIP solvers. In this paper, we investigate the application of CIP to scheduling problems that require resource and start-time assignments to satisfy resource capacities. The best current approach to such problems is logic-based Benders decomposition, a manual decomposition method. We present a CIP model and demonstrate that it achieves performance competitive to the decomposition while out-performing the standard MIP and CP formulations.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzBeck, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Beck, J. Christopher}, title = {Reconsidering Mixed Integer Programming and MIP-based Hybrids for Scheduling}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-14660}, number = {12-05}, abstract = {Despite the success of constraint programming (CP) for scheduling, the much wider penetration of mixed integer programming (MIP) technology into business applications means that many practical scheduling problems are being addressed with MIP, at least as an initial approach. Furthermore, there has been impressive and well-documented improvements in the power of generic MIP solvers over the past decade. We empirically demonstrate that on an existing set of resource allocation and scheduling problems standard MIP and CP models are now competitive with the state-of-the-art manual decomposition approach. Motivated by this result, we formulate two tightly coupled hybrid models based on constraint integer programming (CIP) and demonstrate that these models, which embody advances in CP and MIP, are able to out-perform the CP, MIP, and decomposition models. We conclude that both MIP and CIP are technologies that should be considered along with CP for solving scheduling problems.}, language = {en} }