@misc{BertholdHeinzLuebbeckeetal., author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and L{\"u}bbecke, Marco and M{\"o}hring, Rolf and Schulz, Jens}, title = {A Constraint Integer Programming Approach for Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11180}, number = {10-03}, abstract = {We propose a hybrid approach for solving the resource-constrained project scheduling problem which is an extremely hard to solve combinatorial optimization problem of practical relevance. Jobs have to be scheduled on (renewable) resources subject to precedence constraints such that the resource capacities are never exceeded and the latest completion time of all jobs is minimized. The problem has challenged researchers from different communities, such as integer programming (IP), constraint programming (CP), and satisfiability testing (SAT). Still, there are instances with 60 jobs which have not been solved for many years. The currently best known approach, lazyFD, is a hybrid between CP and SAT techniques. In this paper we propose an even stronger hybridization by integrating all the three areas, IP, CP, and SAT, into a single branch-and-bound scheme. We show that lower bounds from the linear relaxation of the IP formulation and conflict analysis are key ingredients for pruning the search tree. First computational experiments show very promising results. For five instances of the well-known PSPLIB we report an improvement of lower bounds. Our implementation is generic, thus it can be potentially applied to similar problems as well.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHeinzVigerske, author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Vigerske, Stefan}, title = {Extending a CIP framework to solve MIQCPs}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11371}, number = {09-23}, abstract = {This paper discusses how to build a solver for mixed integer quadratically constrained programs (MIQCPs) by extending a framework for constraint integer programming (CIP). The advantage of this approach is that we can utilize the full power of advanced MIP and CP technologies. In particular, this addresses the linear relaxation and the discrete components of the problem. For relaxation, we use an outer approximation generated by linearization of convex constraints and linear underestimation of nonconvex constraints. Further, we give an overview of the reformulation, separation, and propagation techniques that are used to handle the quadratic constraints efficiently. We implemented these methods in the branch-cut-and-price framework SCIP. Computational experiments indicates the potential of the approach.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHeinzPfetsch, author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Nonlinear pseudo-Boolean optimization: relaxation or propagation?}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-11232}, number = {09-11}, abstract = {Pseudo-Boolean problems lie on the border between satisfiability problems, constraint programming, and integer programming. In particular, nonlinear constraints in pseudo-Boolean optimization can be handled by methods arising in these different fields: One can either linearize them and work on a linear programming relaxation or one can treat them directly by propagation. In this paper, we investigate the individual strengths of these approaches and compare their computational performance. Furthermore, we integrate these techniques into a branch-and-cut-and-propagate framework, resulting in an efficient nonlinear pseudo-Boolean solver.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHeinzPfetsch, author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Pfetsch, Marc}, title = {Solving Pseudo-Boolean Problems with SCIP}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-10671}, number = {08-12}, abstract = {Pseudo-Boolean problems generalize SAT problems by allowing linear constraints and a linear objective function. Different solvers, mainly having their roots in the SAT domain, have been proposed and compared,for instance, in Pseudo-Boolean evaluations. One can also formulate Pseudo-Boolean models as integer programming models. That is,Pseudo-Boolean problems lie on the border between the SAT domain and the integer programming field. In this paper, we approach Pseudo-Boolean problems from the integer programming side. We introduce the framework SCIP that implements constraint integer programming techniques. It integrates methods from constraint programming, integer programming, and SAT-solving: the solution of linear programming relaxations, propagation of linear as well as nonlinear constraints, and conflict analysis. We argue that this approach is suitable for Pseudo-Boolean instances containing general linear constraints, while it is less efficient for pure SAT problems. We present extensive computational experiments on the test set used for the Pseudo-Boolean evaluation 2007. We show that our approach is very efficient for optimization instances and competitive for feasibility problems. For the nonlinear parts, we also investigate the influence of linear programming relaxations and propagation methods on the performance. It turns out that both techniques are helpful for obtaining an efficient solution method.}, language = {en} } @misc{BertholdHeinzSchulz, author = {Berthold, Timo and Heinz, Stefan and Schulz, Jens}, title = {An approximative Criterion for the Potential of Energetic Reasoning}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12655}, number = {11-12}, abstract = {Energetic reasoning is one of the most powerful propagation algorithms in cumulative scheduling. In practice, however, it is not commonly used because it has a high running time and its success highly depends on the tightness of the variable bounds. In order to speed up energetic reasoning, we provide an easy-to-check necessary condition for energetic reasoning to detect infeasibilities. We present an implementation of energetic reasoning that employs this condition and that can be parametrically adjusted to handle the trade-off between solving time and propagation overhead. Computational results on instances from the PSPLIB are provided. These results show that using this condition decreases the running time by more than a half, although more search nodes need to be explored.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzSchulz, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Schulz, Jens}, title = {Explanations for the Cumulative Constraint: an Experimental Study}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12668}, number = {11-13}, abstract = {In cumulative scheduling, conflict analysis seems to be one of the key ingredients to solve such problems efficiently. Thereby, the computational complexity of explanation algorithms plays an important role. Even more when we are faced with a backtracking system where explanations need to be constructed on the fly. In this paper we present extensive computational results to analyze the impact of explanation algorithms for the cumulative constraint in a backward checking system. The considered explanation algorithms differ in their quality and computational complexity. We present results for the domain propagation algorithms time-tabling, edge-finding, and energetic reasoning.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzBeck, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Beck, J. Christopher}, title = {Solving Resource Allocation/Scheduling Problems with Constraint Integer Programming}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-12691}, number = {11-14}, abstract = {Constraint Integer Programming (CIP) is a generalization of mixed-integer programming (MIP) in the direction of constraint programming (CP) allowing the inference techniques that have traditionally been the core of \P to be integrated with the problem solving techniques that form the core of complete MIP solvers. In this paper, we investigate the application of CIP to scheduling problems that require resource and start-time assignments to satisfy resource capacities. The best current approach to such problems is logic-based Benders decomposition, a manual decomposition method. We present a CIP model and demonstrate that it achieves performance competitive to the decomposition while out-performing the standard MIP and CP formulations.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzBeck, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Beck, J. Christopher}, title = {Reconsidering Mixed Integer Programming and MIP-based Hybrids for Scheduling}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-14660}, number = {12-05}, abstract = {Despite the success of constraint programming (CP) for scheduling, the much wider penetration of mixed integer programming (MIP) technology into business applications means that many practical scheduling problems are being addressed with MIP, at least as an initial approach. Furthermore, there has been impressive and well-documented improvements in the power of generic MIP solvers over the past decade. We empirically demonstrate that on an existing set of resource allocation and scheduling problems standard MIP and CP models are now competitive with the state-of-the-art manual decomposition approach. Motivated by this result, we formulate two tightly coupled hybrid models based on constraint integer programming (CIP) and demonstrate that these models, which embody advances in CP and MIP, are able to out-perform the CP, MIP, and decomposition models. We conclude that both MIP and CIP are technologies that should be considered along with CP for solving scheduling problems.}, language = {en} } @misc{HeinzKuBeck, author = {Heinz, Stefan and Ku, Wen-Yang and Beck, J. Christopher}, title = {Recent improvements using constraint integer programming for resource allocation and scheduling}, issn = {1438-0064}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-17676}, abstract = {Recently, we compared the performance of mixed-integer programming (MIP), constraint programming (CP), and constraint integer programming (CIP) to a state-of-the-art logic-based Benders manual decomposition (LBBD) for a resource allocation/scheduling problem. For a simple linear relaxation, the LBBD and CIP models deliver comparable performance with MIP also performing well. Here we show that algorithmic developments in CIP plus the use of an existing tighter relaxation substantially improve one of the CIP approaches. Furthermore, the use of the same relaxation in LBBD and MIP models significantly improves their performance. While such a result is known for LBBD, to the best of our knowledge, the other results are novel. Our experiments show that both CIP and MIP approaches are competitive with LBBD in terms of the number of problems solved to proven optimality, though MIP is about three times slower on average. Further, unlike the LBBD and CIP approaches, the MIP model is able to obtain provably high-quality solutions for all problem instances.}, language = {en} } @misc{ShinanoHeinzVigerskeetal., author = {Shinano, Yuji and Heinz, Stefan and Vigerske, Stefan and Winkler, Michael}, title = {FiberSCIP - A shared memory parallelization of SCIP}, issn = {1438-0064}, doi = {10.1287/ijoc.2017.0762}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-42595}, abstract = {Recently, parallel computing environments have become significantly popular. In order to obtain the benefit of using parallel computing environments, we have to deploy our programs for these effectively. This paper focuses on a parallelization of SCIP (Solving Constraint Integer Programs), which is a MIP solver and constraint integer programming framework available in source code. There is a parallel extension of SCIP named ParaSCIP, which parallelizes SCIP on massively parallel distributed memory computing environments. This paper describes FiberSCIP, which is yet another parallel extension of SCIP to utilize multi-threaded parallel computation on shared memory computing environments, and has the following contributions: First, the basic concept of having two parallel extensions and the relationship between them and the parallelization framework provided by UG (Ubiquity Generator) is presented, including an implementation of deterministic parallelization. Second, the difficulties to achieve a good performance that utilizes all resources on an actual computing environment and the difficulties of performance evaluation of the parallel solvers are discussed. Third, a way to evaluate the performance of new algorithms and parameter settings of the parallel extensions is presented. Finally, current performance of FiberSCIP for solving mixed-integer linear programs (MIPs) and mixed-integer non-linear programs (MINLPs) in parallel is demonstrated.}, language = {en} }