@article{GoubergritsHellmeierBrueningetal., author = {Goubergrits, Leonid and Hellmeier, Florian and Bruening, Jan Joris and Spuler, Andreas and Hege, Hans-Christian and Voss, Samuel and Janiga, G{\´a}bor and Saalfeld, Sylvia and Beuing, Oliver and Berg, Philipp}, title = {Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): Uncertainty Quantification of Geometric Rupture Risk Parameters}, series = {BioMedical Engineering OnLine}, volume = {18}, journal = {BioMedical Engineering OnLine}, number = {35}, doi = {10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y}, abstract = {Background Geometric parameters have been proposed for prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Predicting the rupture risk for incidentally detected unruptured aneurysms could help clinicians in their treatment decision. However, assessment of geometric parameters depends on several factors, including the spatial resolution of the imaging modality used and the chosen reconstruction procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the uncertainty of a variety of previously proposed geometric parameters for rupture risk assessment, caused by variability of reconstruction procedures. Materials 26 research groups provided segmentations and surface reconstructions of five cerebral aneurysms as part of the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) 2018. 40 dimensional and non-dimensional geometric parameters, describing aneurysm size, neck size, and irregularity of aneurysm shape, were computed. The medians as well as the absolute and relative uncertainties of the parameters were calculated. Additionally, linear regression analysis was performed on the absolute uncertainties and the median parameter values. Results A large variability of relative uncertainties in the range between 3.9 and 179.8\% was found. Linear regression analysis indicates that some parameters capture similar geometric aspects. The lowest uncertainties < 6\% were found for the non-dimensional parameters isoperimetric ratio, convexity ratio, and ellipticity index. Uncertainty of 2D and 3D size parameters was significantly higher than uncertainty of 1D parameters. The most extreme uncertainties > 80\% were found for some curvature parameters. Conclusions Uncertainty analysis is essential on the road to clinical translation and use of rupture risk prediction models. Uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters provided by this study may help support development of future rupture risk prediction models.}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtBrueningSchmidtetal., author = {Hildebrandt, Thomas and Bruening, Jan Joris and Schmidt, Nora Laura and Lamecker, Hans and Heppt, Werner and Zachow, Stefan and Goubergrits, Leonid}, title = {The Healthy Nasal Cavity - Characteristics of Morphology and Related Airflow Based on a Statistical Shape Model Viewed from a Surgeon's Perspective}, series = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, volume = {35}, journal = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1677721}, pages = {9 -- 13}, abstract = {Functional surgery on the nasal framework requires referential criteria to objectively assess nasal breathing for indication and follow-up. Thismotivated us to generate amean geometry of the nasal cavity based on a statistical shape model. In this study, the authors could demonstrate that the introduced nasal cavity's mean geometry features characteristics of the inner shape and airflow, which are commonly observed in symptom-free subjects. Therefore, the mean geometry might serve as a reference-like model when one considers qualitative aspects. However, to facilitate quantitative considerations and statistical inference, further research is necessary. Additionally, the authorswere able to obtain details about the importance of the isthmus nasi and the inferior turbinate for the intranasal airstream.}, language = {en} } @article{HildebrandtBrueningLameckeretal., author = {Hildebrandt, Thomas and Bruening, Jan Joris and Lamecker, Hans and Zachow, Stefan and Heppt, Werner and Schmidt, Nora and Goubergrits, Leonid}, title = {Digital Analysis of Nasal Airflow Facilitating Decision Support in Rhinosurgery}, series = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, volume = {35}, journal = {Facial Plastic Surgery}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1677720}, pages = {1 -- 8}, abstract = {Successful functional surgery on the nasal framework requires reliable and comprehensive diagnosis. In this regard, the authors introduce a new methodology: Digital Analysis of Nasal Airflow (diANA). It is based on computational fluid dynamics, a statistical shape model of the healthy nasal cavity and rhinologic expertise. diANA necessitates an anonymized tomographic dataset of the paranasal sinuses including the complete nasal cavity and, when available, clinical information. The principle of diANA is to compare the morphology and the respective airflow of an individual nose with those of a reference. This enablesmorphometric aberrations and consecutive flow field anomalies to localize and quantify within a patient's nasal cavity. Finally, an elaborated expert opinion with instructive visualizations is provided. Using diANA might support surgeons in decision-making, avoiding unnecessary surgery, gaining more precision, and target-orientation for indicated operations.}, language = {en} }