@article{SekuboyinaHusseiniBayatetal., author = {Sekuboyina, Anjany and Husseini, Malek E. and Bayat, Amirhossein and L{\"o}ffler, Maximilian and Liebl, Hans and Li, Hongwei and Tetteh, Giles and Kukačka, Jan and Payer, Christian and Štern, Darko and Urschler, Martin and Chen, Maodong and Cheng, Dalong and Lessmann, Nikolas and Hu, Yujin and Wang, Tianfu and Yang, Dong and Xu, Daguang and Ambellan, Felix and Amiranashvili, Tamaz and Ehlke, Moritz and Lamecker, Hans and Lehnert, Sebastian and Lirio, Marilia and de Olaguer, Nicol{\´a}s P{\´e}rez and Ramm, Heiko and Sahu, Manish and Tack, Alexander and Zachow, Stefan and Jiang, Tao and Ma, Xinjun and Angerman, Christoph and Wang, Xin and Brown, Kevin and Kirszenberg, Alexandre and Puybareau, {\´E}lodie and Chen, Di and Bai, Yiwei and Rapazzo, Brandon H. and Yeah, Timyoas and Zhang, Amber and Xu, Shangliang and Hou, Feng and He, Zhiqiang and Zeng, Chan and Xiangshang, Zheng and Liming, Xu and Netherton, Tucker J. and Mumme, Raymond P. and Court, Laurence E. and Huang, Zixun and He, Chenhang and Wang, Li-Wen and Ling, Sai Ho and Huynh, L{\^e} Duy and Boutry, Nicolas and Jakubicek, Roman and Chmelik, Jiri and Mulay, Supriti and Sivaprakasam, Mohanasankar and Paetzold, Johannes C. and Shit, Suprosanna and Ezhov, Ivan and Wiestler, Benedikt and Glocker, Ben and Valentinitsch, Alexander and Rempfler, Markus and Menze, Bj{\"o}rn H. and Kirschke, Jan S.}, title = {VerSe: A Vertebrae labelling and segmentation benchmark for multi-detector CT images}, series = {Medical Image Analysis}, volume = {73}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, doi = {10.1016/j.media.2021.102166}, abstract = {Vertebral labelling and segmentation are two fundamental tasks in an automated spine processing pipeline. Reliable and accurate processing of spine images is expected to benefit clinical decision support systems for diagnosis, surgery planning, and population-based analysis of spine and bone health. However, designing automated algorithms for spine processing is challenging predominantly due to considerable variations in anatomy and acquisition protocols and due to a severe shortage of publicly available data. Addressing these limitations, the Large Scale Vertebrae Segmentation Challenge (VerSe) was organised in conjunction with the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2019 and 2020, with a call for algorithms tackling the labelling and segmentation of vertebrae. Two datasets containing a total of 374 multi-detector CT scans from 355 patients were prepared and 4505 vertebrae have individually been annotated at voxel level by a human-machine hybrid algorithm (https://osf.io/nqjyw/, https://osf.io/t98fz/). A total of 25 algorithms were benchmarked on these datasets. In this work, we present the results of this evaluation and further investigate the performance variation at the vertebra level, scan level, and different fields of view. We also evaluate the generalisability of the approaches to an implicit domain shift in data by evaluating the top-performing algorithms of one challenge iteration on data from the other iteration. The principal takeaway from VerSe: the performance of an algorithm in labelling and segmenting a spine scan hinges on its ability to correctly identify vertebrae in cases of rare anatomical variations. The VerSe content and code can be accessed at: https://github.com/anjany/verse.}, language = {en} } @article{SekuboyinaBayatHusseinietal., author = {Sekuboyina, Anjany and Bayat, Amirhossein and Husseini, Malek E. and L{\"o}ffler, Maximilian and Li, Hongwei and Tetteh, Giles and Kukačka, Jan and Payer, Christian and Štern, Darko and Urschler, Martin and Chen, Maodong and Cheng, Dalong and Lessmann, Nikolas and Hu, Yujin and Wang, Tianfu and Yang, Dong and Xu, Daguang and Ambellan, Felix and Amiranashvili, Tamaz and Ehlke, Moritz and Lamecker, Hans and Lehnert, Sebastian and Lirio, Marilia and de Olaguer, Nicol{\´a}s P{\´e}rez and Ramm, Heiko and Sahu, Manish and Tack, Alexander and Zachow, Stefan and Jiang, Tao and Ma, Xinjun and Angerman, Christoph and Wang, Xin and Wei, Qingyue and Brown, Kevin and Wolf, Matthias and Kirszenberg, Alexandre and Puybareau, {\´E}lodie and Valentinitsch, Alexander and Rempfler, Markus and Menze, Bj{\"o}rn H. and Kirschke, Jan S.}, title = {VerSe: A Vertebrae Labelling and Segmentation Benchmark for Multi-detector CT Images}, series = {arXiv}, journal = {arXiv}, language = {en} } @misc{AmbellanTackEhlkeetal., author = {Ambellan, Felix and Tack, Alexander and Ehlke, Moritz and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Automated Segmentation of Knee Bone and Cartilage combining Statistical Shape Knowledge and Convolutional Neural Networks: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (Supplementary Material)}, series = {Medical Image Analysis}, volume = {52}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, number = {2}, doi = {10.12752/4.ATEZ.1.0}, pages = {109 -- 118}, abstract = {We present a method for the automated segmentation of knee bones and cartilage from magnetic resonance imaging that combines a priori knowledge of anatomical shape with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The proposed approach incorporates 3D Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) as well as 2D and 3D CNNs to achieve a robust and accurate segmentation of even highly pathological knee structures. The shape models and neural networks employed are trained using data of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and the MICCAI grand challenge "Segmentation of Knee Images 2010" (SKI10), respectively. We evaluate our method on 40 validation and 50 submission datasets of the SKI10 challenge. For the first time, an accuracy equivalent to the inter-observer variability of human readers has been achieved in this challenge. Moreover, the quality of the proposed method is thoroughly assessed using various measures for data from the OAI, i.e. 507 manual segmentations of bone and cartilage, and 88 additional manual segmentations of cartilage. Our method yields sub-voxel accuracy for both OAI datasets. We made the 507 manual segmentations as well as our experimental setup publicly available to further aid research in the field of medical image segmentation. In conclusion, combining statistical anatomical knowledge via SSMs with the localized classification via CNNs results in a state-of-the-art segmentation method for knee bones and cartilage from MRI data.}, language = {en} } @article{AmbellanTackEhlkeetal., author = {Ambellan, Felix and Tack, Alexander and Ehlke, Moritz and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Automated Segmentation of Knee Bone and Cartilage combining Statistical Shape Knowledge and Convolutional Neural Networks: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative}, series = {Medical Image Analysis}, volume = {52}, journal = {Medical Image Analysis}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1016/j.media.2018.11.009}, pages = {109 -- 118}, abstract = {We present a method for the automated segmentation of knee bones and cartilage from magnetic resonance imaging that combines a priori knowledge of anatomical shape with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The proposed approach incorporates 3D Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) as well as 2D and 3D CNNs to achieve a robust and accurate segmentation of even highly pathological knee structures. The shape models and neural networks employed are trained using data of the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and the MICCAI grand challenge "Segmentation of Knee Images 2010" (SKI10), respectively. We evaluate our method on 40 validation and 50 submission datasets of the SKI10 challenge. For the first time, an accuracy equivalent to the inter-observer variability of human readers has been achieved in this challenge. Moreover, the quality of the proposed method is thoroughly assessed using various measures for data from the OAI, i.e. 507 manual segmentations of bone and cartilage, and 88 additional manual segmentations of cartilage. Our method yields sub-voxel accuracy for both OAI datasets. We made the 507 manual segmentations as well as our experimental setup publicly available to further aid research in the field of medical image segmentation. In conclusion, combining statistical anatomical knowledge via SSMs with the localized classification via CNNs results in a state-of-the-art segmentation method for knee bones and cartilage from MRI data.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AmbellanTackEhlkeetal., author = {Ambellan, Felix and Tack, Alexander and Ehlke, Moritz and Zachow, Stefan}, title = {Automated Segmentation of Knee Bone and Cartilage combining Statistical Shape Knowledge and Convolutional Neural Networks: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative}, series = {Medical Imaging with Deep Learning}, booktitle = {Medical Imaging with Deep Learning}, abstract = {We present a method for the automated segmentation of knee bones and cartilage from magnetic resonance imaging, that combines a priori knowledge of anatomical shape with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The proposed approach incorporates 3D Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) as well as 2D and 3D CNNs to achieve a robust and accurate segmentation of even highly pathological knee structures. The method is evaluated on data of the MICCAI grand challenge "Segmentation of Knee Images 2010". For the first time an accuracy equivalent to the inter-observer variability of human readers has been achieved in this challenge. Moreover, the quality of the proposed method is thoroughly assessed using various measures for 507 manual segmentations of bone and cartilage, and 88 additional manual segmentations of cartilage. Our method yields sub-voxel accuracy. In conclusion, combining of anatomical knowledge using SSMs with localized classification via CNNs results in a state-of-the-art segmentation method.}, language = {en} }