Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (22)
- Article (12)
- Book (3)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Other (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (41)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (41)
Keywords
- Servant Leadership (2)
- 360 degree Feedback (1)
- Abusive Supervision (1)
- Assessment Center (1)
- Big Five (1)
- Burnout (1)
- COR (1)
- Case-Study (1)
- Conservation of Resources (1)
- Dark Triad (1)
Institute
Theoretischer Hintergrund:
In der psychologischen Führungsforschung zeigt sich ein Shift von traditionellem Management hin zu progressiveren Führungsmodellen, in denen das Gemeinwohl und die nachhaltige Führung von Mitarbeitenden anstelle des Selbstinteresses von Führungskräften treten. Diese Modelle bewegen sich allerdings weiter im traditionellen Paradigma, dass effektive Führung komplexe Systeme gezielt beeinflussen und auf erwünschte Zielzustände hin ausrichten kann.
Fragestellung:
Folgt man dem systemischen Ansatz, so können Führungskräfte das organisationale System nicht beeinflussen, sondern lediglich die Relationen seiner Bestandteile und Rahmenbedingungen für Emergenz schaffen. So lässt es sich beispielsweise aus der Theorie komplexer adaptiver Systeme und dem darauf basierenden Complexity Leadership Ansatz ableiten. Wenngleich viele Wissenschaftler*innen hierin Potential effektiver Führung sehen, mangelt es doch an konzeptionellen und psychometrischen Grundlagen sowie empirischer Evidenz für die Effektivität systemischer Führung.
Methodik:
Wir stellen einen Fremdbeschreibungsfragebogen zur Messung systemischer Führung vor (N ges = 8770) sowie die mit diesem Instrument gewonnenen Ergebnisse verschiedener Feldstudien (k = 28) zu Antezedenzien, Auswirkungen und Randbedingungen systemischer Führung. Wir berücksichtigen auch die inkrementelle Varianzaufklärung über transformationale Führung.
Ergebnisse:
Das Systemic Leadership Inventory ermöglicht die Einschätzung systemischer Kompetenzen von Führungskräften.
Diskussion:
Zukünftige Forschung sollte sich mit der Entwickelbarkeit systemischer Führung beschäftigen. Limitationen unseres Forschungsprojekts werden diskutiert.
Purpose
Although courage has generally been understood as a powerful virtue, research to establish it as a psychological construct is in its infancy. We examined courage in organizations against the backdrop of positive psychology with a design in the Grounded Theory tradition that connects Positive Organizational Behavior and Positive Organizational Scholarship.
Method
The sample consists of organizations that define courage in their mission statement and organizations without such a definition. It includes employees and executives, exploring workplace courage on the macro as well as the micro level. Eleven organizations and 23 participants contributed to the interview study.
Results
Applying Glaser's theoretical coding, specifically the C-family, we propose that courage arises from a decisional conflict in three major domains: the self, social interaction, and performance. It is located on a continuum between apathy and foolhardiness and can take on reactive, proactive, or autonomous forms. Whether and to what extent courage manifests, is a dynamic process contingent upon organizational structure, culture, and communication climate as well as individual cognitiveaffective personality systems.
Limitations
The model depicts the complexity of the phenomenon, rather than details of its individual components. It goes beyond pre-defined categories and prevailing definitions.
Implications
Modern organizations are characterized by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA).
Courage is crucial in such an environment and can be systematically fostered across the whole human
resource management cycle.
Value
The study advances theory building on courage in the workplace and highlights its potential to be
measured, developed and managed for more effective work performance.
Purpose
Although the systemic approach to the leadership concept seems to fit well into our modern complex and dynamic work environment, only little research has been conducted to define and assess systemic leadership. In this study we therefore developed and assessed criterion validity of the multidimensional systemic leadership inventory (SLI, Sülzenbrück & Externbrink, 2017).
Methodology
We conducted two cross-sectional survey among managers and employees of various organizations (N = 143 and N = 150).
Results
We found a robust five-factor structure of the SLI, comprising systemic thinking, self-knowledge, solution-oriented communication, creating meaning and delegation. Regarding criterion validity, a significant positive correlation of systemic leadership was found with affective commitment, while a significant negative correlation with emotional strain in occupational contexts occurred. These overall positive outcomes for employees were not undermined by negative personality traits of the employee (Machiavellianism), while strong growth need strength further enhanced positive effects on affective commitment.
Limitations
Since all variables were measured as self-reports, common method variance could limit our findings.
Practical Implications
Systemic leadership is a very promising new approach for leaders to ensure committed and less strained employees.
Value
Systemic leadership, especially in terms of a leaders’ understanding of organizational and private systems influencing work behaviour of all members of an organization, is a promising novel leadership model suitable to address challenges of complex and dynamic work environments.
This paper makes a contribution to the discussion on microfoundations of dynamic capabilities – actions and interactions in organizations that enable continuous organizational renewal. More specifically, we propose the idea that dynamic capabilities of an organization
are a positive function of corresponding dynamic capabilities of individual and collective actors in the organization. Further, we develop the assumption that not only individual acts of managers but also of individuals and teams without managerial responsibility relate to dynamic capabilities of the organization. Following a holistic view, we also take into consideration empowering working conditions as enhancing factor of this function. To
examine these roots of dynamic capabilities, we use a multi level model of competence provided by Wilkens, Keller and Schmette (2006) that operationalizes the concept of dynamic
capabilities provided by Teece (2007) on a concisely behavioural base. We investigated our hypotheses with a standardized questionnaire in a case study of a German plant engineering company with 112 participants and found first support for our assumptions. Our results show an impact of individual dynamic capabilities on dynamic capabilities of the organization which is mediated by team dynamic capabilities. Psychological and social-structural empowerment moderated this relationship. A case-specific interpretation and implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Leadership Beyond Narcissism: On the Role of Compassionate Love as Antecedent of Servant Leadership
(2020)
While we already know a lot about the outcomes and boundary conditions of servant leadership, there is still a need for research on its antecedents. Building on the theory of purposeful work behavior and further theorizing by van Dierendonck and Patterson (2015), we examine if leaders’ propensity for compassionate love will evoke servant leadership behavior. At the same time, we contrast compassionate love to leaders’ narcissism as psychological counterpart to compassionate love, because narcissism is not associated with leader effectiveness, but with leader emergence instead. We collected data from 170 leader-follower-dyads in a field study in Germany, while measuring leaders’ compassionate love and narcissism, and followers’ perceptions of servant leadership. We found a positive association between leaders’ compassionate love and servant leadership behavior, while narcissism was negatively associated with servant leadership. Theoretical and practical implications, as well as pathways for future research are discussed.

