@inproceedings{SteffensSutterSuelzenbrueck2025, author = {Steffens, Katharina and Sutter, Christine and S{\"u}lzenbr{\"u}ck, Sandra}, title = {Work-Life Blending: The Concept and Potential for Future Research}, series = {Chancen diverser und interkultureller Berufswelten. Ver{\"o}ffentlichung zur 28. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r angewandte Wirtschaftspsychologie (GWPS), Hochschule Hamm-Lippstadt 13.-15. Februar 2025}, booktitle = {Chancen diverser und interkultureller Berufswelten. Ver{\"o}ffentlichung zur 28. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r angewandte Wirtschaftspsychologie (GWPS), Hochschule Hamm-Lippstadt 13.-15. Februar 2025}, publisher = {Pabst Science Publishers}, address = {Lengerich}, isbn = {978-3-95853-972-3}, doi = {10.2440/0006}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:1010-opus4-47140}, pages = {81}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Theoretical Background: Work-Life Blending refers to the dissolution and permeability of boundaries between work and personal life, leading to an integrated experience across these domains. Despite its growing prevalence, a comprehensive conceptualisation of Work-Life-Blending is lacking. Our study addresses this gap by conducting a systematic review to define and clarify the construct, guided by Clark's (2000) work/family border theory. Research Question: Our study aimed to identify key factors and dimensions of Work-Life Blending, leading to a holistic conceptualisation. Specifically, our review seeks to answer: What are the key factors and dimensions of Work-Life-Blending, and how can they be integrated into a unified concept and definition? We aim to review the current state of knowledge, define and clarify the concept, and propose a future research agenda. Methodology: Following PRISMA guidelines (Liberati et al., 2009; Moher et al., 2009), we analysed 51 relevant articles from an initial pool of 1,400 references. A systematic review approach was used to synthesise existing literature and identify the main factors and dimensions associated with Work-Life Blending. Findings: Our findings revealed a diverse and multifaceted field, structured using Clark's (2000) key concepts. This framework provided deeper insights into the complex nature of the topic, highlighting significant diversification in the studies. Discussion and Implications: The study provides a strong foundation for further research on Work-Life Blending. By establishing a classification of key determinants, we offer a comprehensive framework for future studies, e.g., to explore which lifestyle principles can enhance work-life integration and address the challenges of modern work arrangements. References: Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., G{\o}tzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. \& Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34.}, language = {en} }