@article{StachDeepPimenteletal.2025, author = {Stach, Tom Lennard and Deep, Aman and Pimentel, Iris Madge and Buchner, Dominik and Borton, Mikayla A. and Soares, Andr{\´e} and Starke, J{\"o}rn and Bornemann, Till L.V. and Rehsen, Philipp M. and Dreger, Ken L. and Boenigk, Jens and Vos, Matthijs and Leese, Florian and Beißer, Daniela and Probst, Alexander J.}, title = {Complex compositional and metabolic response of river sediment microbiomes to multiple anthropogenic stressors}, series = {ISME Communications}, volume = {2025}, journal = {ISME Communications}, publisher = {Oxford Academic}, doi = {10.1093/ismeco/ycaf079}, pages = {32}, year = {2025}, abstract = {Rivers face constant anthropogenic stress, resulting in significant changes in microbial community composition. What remains unclear is whether stream microbiomes exhibit distinct resilience patterns in composition and/or activity upon exposure to different stressors. By subjecting 64 river-connected mesocosms to multiple stressors, we show that sediment microbiomes of small lowland rivers are highly sensitive to low flow velocity. This stress results in altered community compositions incapable of mitigating the applied stressor within a two-week timeframe despite functional stability (inferred via metagenomics). Transcriptomics revealed a systematic heat shock response in the community and a highly active, metabolically versatile, uncharacterized anaerobic keystone species. Increases in temperature (+ 3.5°C) or salinity (+ 0.5 mS/cm) elicited minor responses at community and transcriptomic levels (e.g., upregulation of photosystems). Following a two-week recovery, transcriptomic-inferred stress responses vanished completely, underscoring the river microbiome resilience. Given the complex community responses observed at the activity and compositional levels, we conclude that maintaining natural river flow is vital to preventing energy loss and reduced microbiome activity in river sediments.}, language = {en} }