open_access
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (450)
- Part of Periodical (139)
- Article (58)
- Book (49)
- Report (21)
- Preprint (18)
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Master's Thesis (10)
- Other (10)
- Bachelor Thesis (7)
Language
- German (480)
- English (294)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Spanish (3)
- French (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (783)
Keywords
- Lehrerbildung (30)
- Deutschland (22)
- Österreich (18)
- Universität Passau (13)
- Kultursemiotik (12)
- Maßtheorie (12)
- Mediensemiotik (12)
- Graphenzeichnen (9)
- Computersicherheit (8)
- Didaktik (7)
Institute
- Philosophische Fakultät (206)
- Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik (114)
- Mitarbeiter Lehrstuhl/Einrichtung der Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik (70)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät (67)
- Juristische Fakultät (40)
- Mitarbeiter Lehrstuhl/Einrichtung der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät (40)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Fachdidaktik (32)
- Department für Katholische Theologie (28)
- Universitätsbibliothek (28)
- Philosophische Fakultät / Pädagogik (23)
Der jüdische Philosoph Hans Jonas legte 1979 mit „Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation“ eines der am meisten gelesenen moralphilosophischen Bücher der Nachkriegszeit vor. Er reagiert damit auf die Tatsache, dass „die Verheißung der modernen Technik in Drohung umgeschlagen ist oder diese sich mit jener unlösbar verbunden hat“. Der Beitrag beleuchtet mit dem Abstand von drei Jahrzehnten die zentralen Thesen und die bleibende Bedeutung dieses Entwurfs.
Der aus Malta stammende Jesuit Tony Mifsud, Professor für Moraltheologie an der Universität Alberto Hurtado (Santiago de Chile), legte 1984 erstmals ein vierbändiges Werk unter dem Titel „Moral de Discernimiento“ vor. Fast zwei Jahrzehnte lang überarbeitet er dieses umfangreiche Konzept und publizierte es in aktualisierten Neuauflagen. Die „Moral de Discernimiento“ gilt als der erste Versuch, die Ideen der Theologie der Befreiung in eine Gesamtsystematik der Moraltheologie zu integrieren.
Die theologisch-ethische Bearbeitung von Themen – wie Freiheit, Sünde und Vergebung – muss erklären können, wie mit biblischen Texten umzugehen ist, wenn durch sie ein erfahrenes Interaktionsgeschehen mit Gott zum Ausdruck kommt. Schließlich besteht die Aufgabe, normative Aussagen für heutiges Handeln begründen zu können. Der Beitrag argumentiert für eine Methodik verhältnismäßiger, historischer Erfahrung.
Eva Hörmanns Beitrag „Die Rohingya-Krise: Eine Analyse der Reaktion der Vereinten Nationen auf die Massenverbrechen" widmet sich der agenda-setting-Rolle der UN für den Nachweis von Massengräueln.
Dariush Movahedian untersucht in „Dröhnendes Schweigen - Deutsche Politik und Medien zu Massenverbrechen im Tigray-Konflikt" Deutschlands Rolle in Bezug auf die Massengräuel in Äthiopien.
Sheila Riek beleuchtet in "German Colonialism in Namibia and the Continuity of Structural lnjustice: Analysing the Parliament's Engagement with the Herero and Nama Genocide" die Erinnerungspolitik Deutschlands, was die Kolonialverbrechen des Deutschen Reiches in Namibia angeht.
Dabei betreten die Beiträge oft auch theoretisches Neuland. Schließlich ist „Schweigen" bislang nicht prominent in den Internationalen Beziehungen bearbeitet worden. Während Dariush Movahedian mit der Diskursgebundenen Identitätstheorie Schweigen in der Politik, nicht aber in den Medien entdecken kann, arbeitet Eva Hörmann mit dem Spiralmodell des Transnationalen Konstruktivismus, um Schweigen gegenüber Massenverbrechen analytisch zu fassen. Sheila Riek bevorzugt dahingegen eine kritische Perspektive, indem sie Ansätze von Structural Injustice und die kritische Diskursanalyse nutzt, um Schweigen zur Herrschaftssicherung aufzudecken.
Mit diesen Studien wird die Bandbreite und der Reichtum von IB-Perspektiven deutlich - und wir verstehen wieder ein kleines bisschen besser, wann, wie und warum wir schweigen.
Inhalt:
Eva Hörmann
Die Rohingya-Krise
Eine Analyse der Reaktion der Vereinten Nationen auf die Massenverbrechen
Sheila-Ann Riek
German Colonialism in Namibia and the Continuity of Structural Injustice
Analysing the Parliament's Engagement with the Herero and Nama Genocide
Dariush Movahedian Moghadam
Dröhnendes Schweigen
Deutsche Politik und Medien zu Massenverbrechen im Tigray-Konflikt
Systems-focused error prevention efforts are internationally recognized in the healthcare industry, and industry efforts to identify and correct organizational defects through the process of CRM are well established in the U.S. and Germany. However, in both countries, there is no clear corresponding liability for healthcare organizations who fail to engage in systems-based learning through the process of clinical risk management (CRM). Although both jurisdictions do recognize organization-based theories of liability, liability for negligent CRM has not been explicitly recognized by courts in either jurisdiction to date. German legal scholars, recognizing this gap in liability for healthcare organizations, have written in support of finding liability for negligent CRM under existing tort law; however, there is no corresponding discussion in the American legal literature. This dissertation fills that gap with a comparative analysis of medical negligence law in the U.S. and Germany through the international lens of modern medical error prevention science and policy to articulate a legal basis and sketch the evidentiary framework for tort liability based on negligent CRM.
In the constrained planarity setting, we ask whether a graph admits a crossing-free drawing that additionally satisfies a given set of constraints. These constraints are often derived from very natural problems; prominent examples are Level Planarity, where vertices have to lie on given horizontal lines indicating a hierarchy, Partially Embedded Planarity, where we extend a given drawing without modifying already-drawn parts, and Clustered Planarity, where we additionally draw the boundaries of clusters which recursively group the vertices in a crossing-free manner. In the last years, the family of constrained planarity problems received a lot of attention in the field of graph drawing. Efficient algorithms were discovered for many of them, while a few others turned out to be NP-complete. In contrast to the extensive theoretical considerations and the direct motivation by applications, only very few of the found algorithms have been implemented and evaluated in practice.
The goal of this thesis is to advance the research on both theoretical as well as practical aspects of constrained planarity. On the theoretical side, we consider two types of constrained planarity problems. The first type are problems that individually constrain the rotations of vertices, that is they restrict the counter-clockwise cyclic orders of the edges incident to vertices. We give a simple linear-time algorithm for the problem Partially Embedded Planarity, which also generalizes to further constrained planarity variants of this type.
The second type of constrained planarity problem concerns more involved planarity variants that come down to the question whether there are embeddings of one or multiple graphs such that the rotations of certain vertices are in sync in a certain way. Clustered Planarity and a variant of the Simultaneous Embedding with Fixed Edges Problem (Connected SEFE-2) are well-known problems of this type. Both are generalized by our Synchronized Planarity problem, for which we give a quadratic algorithm. Through reductions from various other problems, we provide a unified modelling framework for almost all known efficiently solvable constrained planarity variants that also directly provides a quadratic-time solution to all of them.
For both our algorithms, a key ingredient for reaching an efficient solution is the usage of the right data structure for the problem at hand. In this case, these data structures are the SPQR-tree and the PC-tree, which describe planar embedding possibilities from a global and a local perspective, respectively. More specifically, PC-trees can be used to locally describe the possible cyclic orders of edges around vertices in all planar embeddings of a graph. This makes it a key component for our algorithms, as it allows us to test planarity while also respecting further constraints, and to communicate constraints arising from the surrounding graph structure between vertices with synchronized rotation.
Bridging over to the practical side, we present the first correct implementation of PC-trees. We also describe further improvements, which allow us to outperform all implementations of alternative data structures (out of which we only found very few to be fully correct) by at least a factor of 4. We show that this yields a simple and competitive planarity test that can also yield an embedding to certify planarity. We also use our PC-tree implementation to implement our quadratic algorithm for solving Synchronized Planarity. Here, we show that our algorithm greatly outperforms previous attempts at solving related problems like Clustered Planarity in practice. We also engineer its running time and show how degrees of freedom in the theoretical algorithm can be leveraged to yield an up to tenfold speed-up in practice.
The nationalism-patriotism distinction is one of the most influential distinctions in the field of political psychology. While frequently used, the distinction suffers from a number of shortcomings that have hitherto been devoted little attention to. This dissertation aims to contribute to fill this research gap by systematically addressing these pitfalls. Notably, it does not abandon the binary distinction as such, but aims to further refine it. Thoroughly revisiting the nationalism-patriotism distinction, it synthesises the field's two predominant research traditions, i.e. the work of Kosterman and Feshbach (1989) in the U.S. and the one of Blank and Schmidt (2003) in Germany, that have not been brought into dialogue. In so doing, and engaging with research on attachment, it calls for a more nuanced triad of attachments: nationalism, that revolves around the nation; patriotism, that refers to the homeland; and democratic patriotism with democracy as its object of attachment. In line with this triad, it introduces a novel three-factor measurement model that has been validated in three studies in Germany. Overall, the dissertation underlines the need to approach ambiguous and complex concepts such as nationalism and patriotism in a more theoretically consistent way before operationalizing them in a rigorous manner.
Data has become a necessary resource for firm operations in the modern digital world, explaining their growing data gathering efforts. Due to this development, consumers are confronted with decisions to disclose personal data on a daily basis, and have become increasingly intentional about data sharing. While this reluctance to disclose personal data poses challenges for firms, at the same time, it also creates new opportunities for improving privacy-related interactions with customers. This dissertation advocates for a more holistic perspective on consumers’ privacy-related decision-making and introduces the consumer privacy journey consisting of three subsequent phases: pre data disclosure, data disclosure, post data disclosure. In three independent essays, I stress the importance of investigating data requests (i.e., the first step of this journey) as they represent a largely neglected, yet, potentially powerful means to influence consumers’ decision-making and decision-evaluation processes. Based on dual-processing models of decision-making, this dissertation focuses on both consumers’ cognitive and affective evaluations of privacy-related information: First, Essay 1 offers novel conceptualizations and operationalizations of consumers’ perceived behavioral control over personal data (i.e., cognitive processing) in the context of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based data disclosure processes. Next, Essay 2 examines consumers’ cognitive and affective processing of a data request that entails relevance arguments as well as relevance-illustrating game elements. Finally, Essay 3 categorizes affective cues that trigger consumers’ affective processing of a data request and proposes that such cues need to fit with a specific data disclosure situation to foster long-term decision satisfaction. Collectively, my findings provide research and practice with new insights into consumers’ privacy perceptions and behaviors, which are particularly valuable in the context of complex, new (technology-enabled) data disclosure situations.
My dissertation examines literary mythologies of privacy in the authoritarian Russia of 1953–1985. This era was marked by an expansion of “non-state spheres,” or areas of life of which the Communist state increasingly released its control after Joseph Stalin’s death in 1953. Political elites, architects, and designers, as well as ordinary citizens co-constructed and explored the rising spheres through the languages of their respective fields—by producing regulations and laws, designing and erecting new types of buildings, developing new and modernizing already familiar everyday objects as well as devising new ways of integrating these objects into private and public spaces. Alongside these voices, transformations in the cultural sphere in general, and literature in particular, were most vocal. The late Soviet era witnessed the dissolution of the ossified ideology of socialist realism that focused on the glorification of the “new Soviet man” and had held culture in its tight grips since the 1930s. Starting from the 1950s, writers increasingly focused on portraying areas of life that lay beyond one’s public commitments and experimented with new meanings, codes, and forms to give shape to novel spheres of experience of the “late Soviet man” that can be subsumed under the concept of the “private sphere.”
The analytical framework of my dissertation is built around the journey to understand the mechanisms and architecture that powered the imagination of models of distancing oneself from the state and the society at large—scenarios of privacy, as we may call them today. I examine Russian prose and drama of the 1950s–1980s as a laboratory for the ideas of privacy, which was increasingly sought in the society disillusioned by the Communist doctrine and thus progressively alienating from active participation in the public sphere. I analyze the meanings that writers incorporated into new and old forms of domesticity—private flats that became progressively widespread throughout the 1950s–1980s, rooms in communal apartments, individual houses—to determine the spectrum of concepts that nurtured the idea of privacy in the late Soviet literary imagination. I also examine representations of reciprocal paradigms of relations between subjects from which the state and society at large were increasingly excluded. In the examples that I analyze, forms of private withdrawals variate from establishing control over liminal spaces or escaping into the world of feelings and emotions and building a connection to a person or space (significant for the characters for private rather than public reasons) to experimenting with language and pursuing one’s idiolect despite the ubiquitous “officialese,” as well as living in temporalities asynchronous with the public time.
Beyond revealing the visions of different, non-state existences in the late Soviet era, my text also advocates examining the role of official literature as a platform for subversion and change that was no less important in an authoritarian state than dissident literature. I see officially published texts as a cultural subaltern who defies the state of affairs and slowly but firmly turns the “state sphere” into a public one by pushing its own agenda through publications that test and gain ground for bolder visions of Soviet life that are not predicated on the commitment to the public sphere. With individual mechanisms of power assertion employed by the state or literature in the late Soviet era well-researched, the framework is still missing that would capture the shifts of borders between the private and public spheres under the influence of these actors. In devising such framework, I build upon sociological theories of disattendability and civil inattention that Erving Goffman conceived to describe conventions of individual behavior and social interaction in public. Extending these theories toward the studies of literary politics, I argue that by envisioning scenarios of a private retreat and bringing them into officially published editions, literature normalized privacy as a late Soviet imaginary and, therefore, continuously heightened its own disattendability, thereby expanding the borders of the private sphere. On the side of the state, the border was defined by the triggers of disturbance of civil inattention: privacy was conceded in return for disattendability. Under such conditions, literature became a bizarre “private kitchen” that performed private and public functions simultaneously—similar to the kitchens in newly-built individual apartments that were popular loci of socialization in the late Soviet era. It turned into a place where one can escape—it became one of the “niches of privacy” where it was possible to discuss and negotiate the world, in which the society lived or to which it should strive. At the same time, it assumed the role of a surrogate for the public sphere within the “state” sphere by pushing its own agenda through the publication of literary texts that sought to imagine a person rather than a cog in the Communist machine and thus transformed socialist realism into a literary current “with a human face.”
In my research, privacy, literature, and politics are bound together to reveal a vibrant spectacle of the continuous interaction between the state, cultural elites, and the citizens, in which thresholds are erected and crossed incessantly. Fictional private sites were battlefields for the production and contestation of ideologies, and the exposure of these literary wars to the public eye played a fundamental role in shifting the borders between the private and the public spheres in an authoritarian late Soviet Russia. The patterns of relations between the state and culture that I uncover in my dissertation resonate in neo-authoritarian twenty-first-century Russia, making privacy an important lens for our insight into the role of culture in rising authoritarian and failing democratic systems across the globe.