open_access
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (445)
- Part of Periodical (139)
- Article (56)
- Book (49)
- Report (21)
- Preprint (16)
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Master's Thesis (10)
- Other (9)
- Bachelor Thesis (7)
Language
- German (478)
- English (286)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Spanish (3)
- French (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (773)
Keywords
- Lehrerbildung (30)
- Deutschland (22)
- Österreich (18)
- Universität Passau (13)
- Kultursemiotik (12)
- Maßtheorie (12)
- Mediensemiotik (12)
- Graphenzeichnen (9)
- Computersicherheit (8)
- Didaktik (7)
Institute
- Philosophische Fakultät (206)
- Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik (112)
- Mitarbeiter Lehrstuhl/Einrichtung der Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik (70)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät (65)
- Mitarbeiter Lehrstuhl/Einrichtung der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät (40)
- Juristische Fakultät (39)
- Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Fachdidaktik (32)
- Department für Katholische Theologie (28)
- Universitätsbibliothek (28)
- Philosophische Fakultät / Pädagogik (23)
ChatGPT and similar generative AI models have attracted hundreds of millions of users and have become part of the public discourse. Many believe that such models will disrupt society and lead to significant changes in the education system and information generation. So far, this belief is based on either colloquial evidence or benchmarks from the owners of the models—both lack scientific rigor. We systematically assess the quality of AI-generated content through a large-scale study comparing human-written versus ChatGPT-generated argumentative student essays. We use essays that were rated by a large number of human experts (teachers). We augment the analysis by considering a set of linguistic characteristics of the generated essays. Our results demonstrate that ChatGPT generates essays that are rated higher regarding quality than human-written essays. The writing style of the AI models exhibits linguistic characteristics that are different from those of the human-written essays. Since the technology is readily available, we believe that educators must act immediately. We must re-invent homework and develop teaching concepts that utilize these AI models in the same way as math utilizes the calculator: teach the general concepts first and then use AI tools to free up time for other learning objectives.
Das Thema dieser Arbeit begibt sich ins Zentrum der Befreiungstheologie. Es geht um die Befähigung des Armen, sein Subjektsein deuten zu lernen und es so verantwortungsfähig entfalten zu können. Der Arme ist dazu auf Unterstützung angewiesen. Er braucht jemanden, der sich für ihn entscheidet und gegen die Realität der Unterdrückung stellt. Jeder, der das konsequent tut, muss wissen, dass er dabei sein eigenes Leben riskiert. Gerade deswegen ist nach den Gründen solchen Handelns zu fragen.
Der jüdische Philosoph Hans Jonas legte 1979 mit „Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation“ eines der am meisten gelesenen moralphilosophischen Bücher der Nachkriegszeit vor. Er reagiert damit auf die Tatsache, dass „die Verheißung der modernen Technik in Drohung umgeschlagen ist oder diese sich mit jener unlösbar verbunden hat“. Der Beitrag beleuchtet mit dem Abstand von drei Jahrzehnten die zentralen Thesen und die bleibende Bedeutung dieses Entwurfs.
Der aus Malta stammende Jesuit Tony Mifsud, Professor für Moraltheologie an der Universität Alberto Hurtado (Santiago de Chile), legte 1984 erstmals ein vierbändiges Werk unter dem Titel „Moral de Discernimiento“ vor. Fast zwei Jahrzehnte lang überarbeitet er dieses umfangreiche Konzept und publizierte es in aktualisierten Neuauflagen. Die „Moral de Discernimiento“ gilt als der erste Versuch, die Ideen der Theologie der Befreiung in eine Gesamtsystematik der Moraltheologie zu integrieren.
Die theologisch-ethische Bearbeitung von Themen – wie Freiheit, Sünde und Vergebung – muss erklären können, wie mit biblischen Texten umzugehen ist, wenn durch sie ein erfahrenes Interaktionsgeschehen mit Gott zum Ausdruck kommt. Schließlich besteht die Aufgabe, normative Aussagen für heutiges Handeln begründen zu können. Der Beitrag argumentiert für eine Methodik verhältnismäßiger, historischer Erfahrung.
Eva Hörmanns Beitrag „Die Rohingya-Krise: Eine Analyse der Reaktion der Vereinten Nationen auf die Massenverbrechen" widmet sich der agenda-setting-Rolle der UN für den Nachweis von Massengräueln.
Dariush Movahedian untersucht in „Dröhnendes Schweigen - Deutsche Politik und Medien zu Massenverbrechen im Tigray-Konflikt" Deutschlands Rolle in Bezug auf die Massengräuel in Äthiopien.
Sheila Riek beleuchtet in "German Colonialism in Namibia and the Continuity of Structural lnjustice: Analysing the Parliament's Engagement with the Herero and Nama Genocide" die Erinnerungspolitik Deutschlands, was die Kolonialverbrechen des Deutschen Reiches in Namibia angeht.
Dabei betreten die Beiträge oft auch theoretisches Neuland. Schließlich ist „Schweigen" bislang nicht prominent in den Internationalen Beziehungen bearbeitet worden. Während Dariush Movahedian mit der Diskursgebundenen Identitätstheorie Schweigen in der Politik, nicht aber in den Medien entdecken kann, arbeitet Eva Hörmann mit dem Spiralmodell des Transnationalen Konstruktivismus, um Schweigen gegenüber Massenverbrechen analytisch zu fassen. Sheila Riek bevorzugt dahingegen eine kritische Perspektive, indem sie Ansätze von Structural Injustice und die kritische Diskursanalyse nutzt, um Schweigen zur Herrschaftssicherung aufzudecken.
Mit diesen Studien wird die Bandbreite und der Reichtum von IB-Perspektiven deutlich - und wir verstehen wieder ein kleines bisschen besser, wann, wie und warum wir schweigen.
Inhalt:
Eva Hörmann
Die Rohingya-Krise
Eine Analyse der Reaktion der Vereinten Nationen auf die Massenverbrechen
Sheila-Ann Riek
German Colonialism in Namibia and the Continuity of Structural Injustice
Analysing the Parliament's Engagement with the Herero and Nama Genocide
Dariush Movahedian Moghadam
Dröhnendes Schweigen
Deutsche Politik und Medien zu Massenverbrechen im Tigray-Konflikt
Systems-focused error prevention efforts are internationally recognized in the healthcare industry, and industry efforts to identify and correct organizational defects through the process of CRM are well established in the U.S. and Germany. However, in both countries, there is no clear corresponding liability for healthcare organizations who fail to engage in systems-based learning through the process of clinical risk management (CRM). Although both jurisdictions do recognize organization-based theories of liability, liability for negligent CRM has not been explicitly recognized by courts in either jurisdiction to date. German legal scholars, recognizing this gap in liability for healthcare organizations, have written in support of finding liability for negligent CRM under existing tort law; however, there is no corresponding discussion in the American legal literature. This dissertation fills that gap with a comparative analysis of medical negligence law in the U.S. and Germany through the international lens of modern medical error prevention science and policy to articulate a legal basis and sketch the evidentiary framework for tort liability based on negligent CRM.
In the constrained planarity setting, we ask whether a graph admits a crossing-free drawing that additionally satisfies a given set of constraints. These constraints are often derived from very natural problems; prominent examples are Level Planarity, where vertices have to lie on given horizontal lines indicating a hierarchy, Partially Embedded Planarity, where we extend a given drawing without modifying already-drawn parts, and Clustered Planarity, where we additionally draw the boundaries of clusters which recursively group the vertices in a crossing-free manner. In the last years, the family of constrained planarity problems received a lot of attention in the field of graph drawing. Efficient algorithms were discovered for many of them, while a few others turned out to be NP-complete. In contrast to the extensive theoretical considerations and the direct motivation by applications, only very few of the found algorithms have been implemented and evaluated in practice.
The goal of this thesis is to advance the research on both theoretical as well as practical aspects of constrained planarity. On the theoretical side, we consider two types of constrained planarity problems. The first type are problems that individually constrain the rotations of vertices, that is they restrict the counter-clockwise cyclic orders of the edges incident to vertices. We give a simple linear-time algorithm for the problem Partially Embedded Planarity, which also generalizes to further constrained planarity variants of this type.
The second type of constrained planarity problem concerns more involved planarity variants that come down to the question whether there are embeddings of one or multiple graphs such that the rotations of certain vertices are in sync in a certain way. Clustered Planarity and a variant of the Simultaneous Embedding with Fixed Edges Problem (Connected SEFE-2) are well-known problems of this type. Both are generalized by our Synchronized Planarity problem, for which we give a quadratic algorithm. Through reductions from various other problems, we provide a unified modelling framework for almost all known efficiently solvable constrained planarity variants that also directly provides a quadratic-time solution to all of them.
For both our algorithms, a key ingredient for reaching an efficient solution is the usage of the right data structure for the problem at hand. In this case, these data structures are the SPQR-tree and the PC-tree, which describe planar embedding possibilities from a global and a local perspective, respectively. More specifically, PC-trees can be used to locally describe the possible cyclic orders of edges around vertices in all planar embeddings of a graph. This makes it a key component for our algorithms, as it allows us to test planarity while also respecting further constraints, and to communicate constraints arising from the surrounding graph structure between vertices with synchronized rotation.
Bridging over to the practical side, we present the first correct implementation of PC-trees. We also describe further improvements, which allow us to outperform all implementations of alternative data structures (out of which we only found very few to be fully correct) by at least a factor of 4. We show that this yields a simple and competitive planarity test that can also yield an embedding to certify planarity. We also use our PC-tree implementation to implement our quadratic algorithm for solving Synchronized Planarity. Here, we show that our algorithm greatly outperforms previous attempts at solving related problems like Clustered Planarity in practice. We also engineer its running time and show how degrees of freedom in the theoretical algorithm can be leveraged to yield an up to tenfold speed-up in practice.
The nationalism-patriotism distinction is one of the most influential distinctions in the field of political psychology. While frequently used, the distinction suffers from a number of shortcomings that have hitherto been devoted little attention to. This dissertation aims to contribute to fill this research gap by systematically addressing these pitfalls. Notably, it does not abandon the binary distinction as such, but aims to further refine it. Thoroughly revisiting the nationalism-patriotism distinction, it synthesises the field's two predominant research traditions, i.e. the work of Kosterman and Feshbach (1989) in the U.S. and the one of Blank and Schmidt (2003) in Germany, that have not been brought into dialogue. In so doing, and engaging with research on attachment, it calls for a more nuanced triad of attachments: nationalism, that revolves around the nation; patriotism, that refers to the homeland; and democratic patriotism with democracy as its object of attachment. In line with this triad, it introduces a novel three-factor measurement model that has been validated in three studies in Germany. Overall, the dissertation underlines the need to approach ambiguous and complex concepts such as nationalism and patriotism in a more theoretically consistent way before operationalizing them in a rigorous manner.
Data has become a necessary resource for firm operations in the modern digital world, explaining their growing data gathering efforts. Due to this development, consumers are confronted with decisions to disclose personal data on a daily basis, and have become increasingly intentional about data sharing. While this reluctance to disclose personal data poses challenges for firms, at the same time, it also creates new opportunities for improving privacy-related interactions with customers. This dissertation advocates for a more holistic perspective on consumers’ privacy-related decision-making and introduces the consumer privacy journey consisting of three subsequent phases: pre data disclosure, data disclosure, post data disclosure. In three independent essays, I stress the importance of investigating data requests (i.e., the first step of this journey) as they represent a largely neglected, yet, potentially powerful means to influence consumers’ decision-making and decision-evaluation processes. Based on dual-processing models of decision-making, this dissertation focuses on both consumers’ cognitive and affective evaluations of privacy-related information: First, Essay 1 offers novel conceptualizations and operationalizations of consumers’ perceived behavioral control over personal data (i.e., cognitive processing) in the context of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based data disclosure processes. Next, Essay 2 examines consumers’ cognitive and affective processing of a data request that entails relevance arguments as well as relevance-illustrating game elements. Finally, Essay 3 categorizes affective cues that trigger consumers’ affective processing of a data request and proposes that such cues need to fit with a specific data disclosure situation to foster long-term decision satisfaction. Collectively, my findings provide research and practice with new insights into consumers’ privacy perceptions and behaviors, which are particularly valuable in the context of complex, new (technology-enabled) data disclosure situations.