TY - INPR A1 - Grimm, Veronika A1 - Nowak, Daniel A1 - Schewe, Lars A1 - Schmidt, Martin A1 - Schwartz, Alexandra A1 - Zöttl, Gregor T1 - A Tractable Multi-Leader Multi-Follower Peak-Load-Pricing Model with Strategic Interaction N2 - While single-level Nash equilibrium problems are quite well understood nowadays, less is known about multi-leader multi-follower games. However, these have important applications, e.g., in the analysis of electricity and gas markets, where often a limited number of firms interacts on various subsequent markets. In this paper, we consider a special class of two-level multi-leader multi-follower games that can be applied, e.g., to model strategic booking decisions in the European entry-exit gas market. For this nontrivial class of games, we develop a solution algorithm that is able to compute the complete set of Nash equilibria instead of just individual solutions or a bigger set of stationary points. Additionally, we prove that for this class of games, the solution set is finite and provide examples for instances without any Nash equilibria in pure strategies. We apply the algorithm to a case study in which we compute strategic booking and nomination decisions in a model of the European entry-exit gas market system. Finally, we use our algorithm to provide a publicly available test library for the considered class of multi-leader multi-follower games. This library contains problem instances with different economic and mathematical properties so that other researchers in the field can test and benchmark newly developed methods for this challenging class of problems. KW - Game theory KW - Nash-Cournot equilibria KW - Multi-leader multi-follower game KW - Peak-load pricing Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-021-01708-0 ER - TY - INPR A1 - Runge, Philipp A1 - Sölch, Christian A1 - Albert, Jakob A1 - Wasserscheid, Peter A1 - Zöttl, Gregor A1 - Grimm, Veronika T1 - Economic comparison of electric fuels produced at excellent locations for renewable energies: A Scenario for 2035 N2 - The use of electric fuels (e-fuels) enables CO2-neutral mobility and opens therefore an alternative to fossil-fuel-fired engines or battery-powered electric motors. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of Fischer-Tropsch diesel, methanol, and hydrogen stored as cryogenic liquid (LH2) or in form of liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs). The production cost of those fuels are to a large extent driven by the energy-intensive electrolytic water splitting. The option of producing e-fuels in Germany competes with international locations with excellent conditions for renewable energy harvesting and thus very low levelized cost of electricity. We developed a mathematical model that covers the entire process chain. Starting with the production of the required resources such as fresh water, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, electrical and thermal energy, the subsequent chemical synthesis, the transport to filling stations in Germany and finally the energetic utilization of the fuels in the vehicle. We found that the choice of production site can have a major impact on the mobility cost using the respective fuels. Especially in case of diesel production, the levelized cost of electricity driven by the full load hours of the applied renewable energy source have a huge impact. An LOHC-based system is shown to be less dependent on the kind of electricity source compared to other technologies due to its comparatively low electricity consumption and the low cost for the hydrogenation units. The length of the transportation route and the price of the filling station infrastructure, on the other hand, clearly increase mobility cost for LOHC and LH2. KW - Electric fuels, Hydrogen Utilization, Hydrogen Import, LOHC, Mobility Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - INPR A1 - Bohlayer, Markus A1 - Bürger, Adrian A1 - Fleschutz, Markus A1 - Braun, Marco A1 - Zöttl, Gregor T1 - Multi-period investment pathways - Modeling approaches to design distributed energy systems under uncertainty N2 - Multi-modal distributed energy system planning is applied in the context of smart grids, industrial energy supply,and in the building energy sector. In real-world applications, these systems are commonly characterized by existing system structures of different age where monitoring and investment are conducted in a closed-loop, with the iterative possibility to invest. The literature contains two main approaches to approximate this computationally intensive multiperiod investment problem. The first approach simplifies the temporal decision-making process collapsing the multistage decision to a two-stage decision, considering uncertainty in the second stage decision variables. The second approach considers multi-period investments under the assumption of perfect foresight. In this work, we propose a multi-stage stochastic optimization problem that captures multi-period investment decisions under uncertainty and solves the problem to global optimality, serving as a first-best benchmark to the problem. To evaluate the performance of conventional approaches applied in a multi-year setup and to solve the multi-period problem at lower computational effort, we propose a rolling horizon heuristic that on the one hand reveals the performance of conventional approaches applied in a multi-period set-up and on the other hand enables planners to identify approximate solutions to the original multi-stage stochastic problem. Additionally, we consider an open-loop version of the rolling horizon algorithm to evaluate how single-period investments perform with respect to the entire scenario tree and compared to multi-period investments. We conduct a real-world case study and investigate solution quality as well as the computational performance of the proposed approaches. Our findings indicate that the approximation of multi-period investments by two-stage stochastic approaches yield the best results regarding constraint satisfaction, while deterministic multi-period approximations yield better economic and computational performance. Y1 - 2020 ER -