<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>1478</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>8</issue>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Contours of citizen science: a vignette study</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Citizen science has expanded rapidly over the past decades. Yet, defining citizen science and its boundaries remained a challenge, and this is reflected in the literature—for example in the proliferation of typologies and definitions. There is a need for identifying areas of agreement and disagreement within the citizen science practitioners community on what should be considered as citizen science activity. This paper describes the development and results of a survey that examined this issue, through the use of vignettes—short case descriptions that describe an activity, while asking the respondents to rate the activity on a scale from ‘not citizen science’ (0%) to ‘citizen science’ (100%). The survey included 50 vignettes, of which five were developed as clear cases of not-citizen science activities, five as widely accepted citizen science activities and the others addressing 10 factors and 61 sub-factors that can lead to controversy about an activity. The survey has attracted 333 respondents, who provided over 5100 ratings. The analysis demonstrates the plurality of understanding of what citizen science is and calls for an open understanding of what activities are included in the field.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Royal Society Open Science</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:526-opus4-14781</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2021-08-30T07:04:19+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.file">filename=phpXbrYsD</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.checksum">aa4c0ebf00af6726158a1ea92d69867e</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="SourceTitle">Haklay Muki, Fraisl Dilek, Greshake Tzovaras Bastian, Hecker Susanne, Gold Margaret, Hager Gerid, Ceccaroni Luigi, Kieslinger Barbara, Wehn Uta, Woods Sasha, Nold Christian, Balázs Bálint, Mazzonetto Marzia, Ruefenacht Simone, Shanley Lea A., Wagenknecht Katherin, Motion Alice, Sforzi Andrea, Riemenschneider Dorte, Dorler Daniel, Heigl Florian, Schaefer Teresa, Lindner Ariel, Weißpflug Maike, Mačiulienė Monika and Vohland Katrin 2021Contours of citizen science: a vignette studyR. Soc. open sci.8202108202108 http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202108</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="DOI_VoR">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202108</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Muki Haklay</author>
    <author>Dilek Fraisl</author>
    <author>Bastian Greshake Tzovaras</author>
    <author>Susanne Hecker</author>
    <author>Margaret Gold</author>
    <author>Gerid Hager</author>
    <author>Luigi Ceccaroni</author>
    <author>Barbara Kieslinger</author>
    <author>Uta Wehn</author>
    <author>Sasha Woods</author>
    <author>Christian Nold</author>
    <author>Bálint Balázs</author>
    <author>Marzia Mazzonetto</author>
    <author>Simone Rüfenacht</author>
    <author>Lea A. Shanley</author>
    <author>Katherin Wagenknecht</author>
    <author>Alice Motion</author>
    <author>Andrea Sforzi</author>
    <author>Dorte Riemenschneider</author>
    <author>Daniel Dorler</author>
    <author>Florian Heigl</author>
    <author>Teresa Schaefer</author>
    <author>Ariel Lindner</author>
    <author>Maike Weißpflug</author>
    <author>Monika Mačiulienė</author>
    <author>Katrin Vohland</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="303">Gesellschaftliche Prozesse</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wirtschaft, Informatik, Recht</collection>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="Import" number="import">Import</collection>
    <collection role="green_open_access" number="1">Gold Open Access</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Wildau</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-th-wildau/files/1478/rsos.202108.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1403</id>
    <completedYear>2021</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>03</issue>
    <volume>20</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>1</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A question of dialogue? Reflections on how citizen science can enhance communication between science and society</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Citizen science is a transdisciplinary approach that responds to the current science policy agenda: in terms of supporting open science, and by using a range of science communication instruments. In particular, it opens up scientific research processes by involving citizens at different phases; this also creates a range of opportunities for science communication to happen This article explores methodological and practical characteristics of citizen science as a form of science communication by examining three case studies that took different approaches to citizens' participation in science. Through these, it becomes clear that communication in citizen science is ‘÷always’ science communication and an essential part of “doing science”.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">JCOM: Journal of Science Communication</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1824-2049</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:kobv:526-opus4-14035</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="SourceTitle">Wagenknecht, K., Woods, T., Nold, C., Rüfenacht, S., Voigt-Heucke, S., Caplan, A., Hecker, S. and Vohland, K. (2021). ‘A question of dialogue? Reflections on how citizen science can enhance communication between science and society’. JCOM 20 (03), A13. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030213.</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="DOI_VoR">https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20030213</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Katherin Wagenknecht</author>
    <author>Tim Woods</author>
    <author>Christian Nold</author>
    <author>Simone Rüfenacht</author>
    <author>Silke Voigt-Heucke</author>
    <author>Anne Caplan</author>
    <author>Susanne Hecker</author>
    <author>Katrin Vohland</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>citizen science</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>science communication in the developing world</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>science communication: theory and models</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Wissenschaftskommunikation</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="301">Soziologie, Anthropologie</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="500">Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fachbereich Wirtschaft, Informatik, Recht</collection>
    <collection role="open_access" number="">open_access</collection>
    <collection role="green_open_access" number="3">Diamond Open Access</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Wildau</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-th-wildau/files/1403/JCOM_2003_2021_A13.pdf</file>
  </doc>
</export-example>
