Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (6)
Keywords
- Peripheral Arterial Disease (2)
- Arzneimittelzulassung (1)
- Cost Benefit Analysis (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Gesundheitsökonomie (1)
- Guideline Orientation (1)
- Health Economics (1)
- Innovationskrise (1)
- Medicine (1)
- Nutzenbewertung (1)
Zulassung und Erstattung personalisierter Arzneimittel: Zwischenbilanz des Anpassungsprozesses
(2013)
Die Arzneimittelzulassung und der Aufnahmeprozess zur Kostenerstattung sollen die Entwicklung und Vermarktung von pharmazeutischen Innovationen mit Patientennutzen nicht behindern, zugleich aber die Wirtschaftlichkeit der Arzneimittelversorgung für die Kostenträger nicht gefährden. Eine Anpassung der Verfahren an die Merkmale personalisierter Arzneimittel erscheint notwendig. Dabei ist allerdings zu fragen, ob eine ungerechtfertigte Privilegierung erfolgt. In den USA und in der EU werden die jeweiligen Zulassungsverfahren für Arzneimittel und Tests schrittweise angepasst und integriert. Zulassung und Erstattungsentscheidungen sollen koordiniert werden. Eine Privilegierung, wie bei Arzneimitteln für seltene Indikationen (Orphan Drugs), findet jedoch für personalisierte Medizin nicht statt. Es bestehen keine unzumutbaren Hürden für die Hersteller. Zurückhaltung bei der Entwicklung innovativer Produkte wäre deshalb nicht gerechtfertigt.
For patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic liver failure (ACLF), the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) can result in a prolongation of life, but data on costs and cost-effectiveness are lacking. A health economic evaluation of a prospective controlled cohort trial in patients with ACLF not eligible for liver transplantation with 3 years follow-up and consecutive modelling of long-term costs, outcomes and cost-effectiveness was conducted. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the German health-care system. One hundred and forty-nine patients with ACLF were included of which 67 (44.9%) were treated with MARS and 82 (55.1%) assigned to the control group. Mean survival was 692 days in MARS-treated patients (33% survival after 3 years) and 453 days in control patients (15% after 3 years, logrank P = 0.022). MARS patients gained 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.12 to 1.46] life years (LYs), determined by the bootstrap method. The mean cost difference was 19.835 euro (95% CI: 13.308-25.429) with 35639 euro for MARS-treated patients and 15804 euro for controls. Incremental costs per LY gained were 29.985 euro (95% CI: 9.441-321.761) and 43.040 euro (95% CI: 13.551-461.856) per quality-adjusted LY gained. There is an acceptable cost-effectiveness of MARS, compared with other medical technologies presently reimbursed. Randomized controlled trials with sufficient sample size are necessary before a final recommendation for MARS can be given.
Das Deutsche Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.) hat am 30.08.2010 getragen von den genannten im DNVF organisierten Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen, das Memorandum III „Methoden für die Versorgungsforschung” Teil 2 verabschiedet, das in dieser Zeitschrift publiziert wurde [Gesundheitswesen 2010; 72: 739-748]. Die vorliegende Publikation fokussiert auf die Methodik der ökonomischen Evaluation der Gesundheitstechnologien bzw. Interventionen und stellt eine Vertiefung zu dem Memorandum III „Methoden für die Versorgungsforschung” Teil 2 dar. Zunächst werden allgemeine methodische Standards gesundheitsökonomischer Evaluationen, d. h. Studien, die die Kosten-Nutzen Relation (Wirtschaftlichkeit) von Interventionen untersuchen, kurz dargestellt. Um Versorgungsrealität adäquat zu reflektieren, müssen zur Ermittlung der Interventionskosten und -effekte oft mehrere Datenquellen, z. B. Wirksamkeitsstudien, Register, administrative Quellen usw., verwendet werden. Daher werden für die gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluationen im Rahmen der Versorgungsforschung potenziell geeignete Datenquellen vorgestellt, ihre Vorteile und Limitationen genannt. Anschließend wird der Weiterentwicklungsbedarf der Methodik im Hinblick auf die Datenerhebung, und -auswertung sowie die Kommunikation und Dissemination der Ergebnisse diskutiert.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a marker of elevated vascular risk, is highly prevalent in
general practice. We aimed to investigate patient characteristics and outcomes of PAD patients treated according to the guidelines versus those who were not.
Methods. PACE-PAD was a multicentre, cluster - randomised prospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with PAD in primary care, who were followed-up for death or vascular events over 18 months. Guideline-orientation was assumed, if patients received anti¬coagu¬lant/antiplatelet therapy, exercise training, and (if applicable) advice for smoking cessation and therapy of
diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia, respectively.
Results. The 5099 PAD patients (mean age 68.0 ± 9.0 years, 68.5% males) who were followed-up were in Fontaine stages I, IIa, IIb, III, and IV in 22.5%, 34.6%, 30.1%, 7.8%, and 3.5%
(1.5% not specified). Comprehensive guideline orientation was reported in 28.4% only, however, patients in lower Fontaine stages received more often guideline-oriented therapy (I: 30.3%; IIa: 31.6%, IIb: 29.1%, III: 9.8%, IV: 18.0%). During 18 months, 457 patients died (224 due to cerebrovascular or coronary deaths), 319 had instable angina pectoris, 116 myocardial infarction, and 140 an ischemic stroke event. In total, 24% of patients had experienced any vascular event (19.1% a first event). Event rates did not differ between patients treated according to guidelines, and those who were not.
Conclusion. The present PAD cohort was a high-risk sample with an unexpectedly high rate of deaths and vascular events. While physicians appear to focus on the treatment of individual risk factors, rates of comprehensive PAD management in line with guideline recommendations are still suboptimal. Factors contributing to the lacking difference between outcomes in the guideline-oriented and non-guideline-oriented groups may comprise low treatment intensity or other reasons for unsatisfactory effect of treatment, misclassification of events, patient's non-compliance with therapy.
According to drug manufacturers, the pharmaceutical industry is suffering from an ‘innovation crisis’. Nowadays, the development of new products requires significantly more investment than in the past. Most of the simple but useful chemical entities seem to have been discovered already. Moreover, many topselling drugs lose their patent protection (‘patent cliff ’) and, subsequently, prices and sales of the original drug are undermined by competing generics. Producers try to compensate for the loss of sales by launches of new molecular entities (Jimenez, 2012). However, the new compounds generate fewer sales. As market observers calculated, new products launched in the period from 2001 to 2005 achieved annual average sales of USD 208 million after three years. New products of the period from 2006 to 2010 reached only USD 143 million (Rockoff and Winslow, 2013). Development of a drug which yields more than a billion USD per year (‘blockbuster’) succeeds less often. Drugs combined with biomarker-based diagnostic tests, stratifying patients into groups characterised by different drug reactions, appear to be one way out of trouble, because a new generation of patented products seems attainable (Scollen and Phelan, 2014).
Effect of Guideline Orientation on the Outcomes of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Primary Care
(2011)
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), an established marker of premature death and cardiovascular risk in general, is highly prevalent. We analysed factors associated with poor outcomes in an observational cohort, with particular focus on the effect of guideline orientation in the management of these patients.