Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (194)
- Conference Proceeding/Conference Report (125)
- Part of a Book (70)
- Lecture/Speech (54)
- Book (52)
- Bachelor Thesis (12)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Master's Thesis (4)
- Working Paper (2)
- Editorship Editorial Board (1)
Language
- English (298)
- German (219)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Spanish (1)
Keywords
- Psychology (32)
- Coaching (15)
- Healthcare (11)
- Cloud Computing (10)
- Personalentwicklung (9)
- Personalmanagement (9)
- Physics (9)
- Digitalisierung (8)
- Gesundheitsökonomie (8)
- Psychologie (8)
Taking a social relations approach to team diversity, we propose that faultlines—hypothetical dividing lines that split a team into relatively homogeneous subgroups—impact the team members’ propensity to exhibit social loafing behaviour. We further propose that this individual-level reaction to the faultline structure of the team can differ among team members, depending on the size of their subgroup and on their individual social competence. We tested the assumptions with a sample of real teams working on an intellective task during which social loafing behaviour was video-coded. In partial support of the hypotheses, generalized mixed models revealed that social loafing behaviour was most common for team members who were part of a team with strong faultlines, who belonged to the larger subgroup in their team, and who exhibited low levels of social competence. The results therefore highlight the benefits of taking a multilevel approach to the effects of faultlines.
Put-down humor always has a target, and the intent of the speaker is to make fun of someone or something. Due to its inherently social nature, put-down humor could strongly affect socio-emotional group processes and outcomes like cohesion. We hypothesized that put-down humor would increase cohesion when it was targeted at outgroup members and was followed by laughter. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to examine the underlying processes of the put-down humor – cohesion relation. Study 1 showed that put-down humor of outgroup members (as compared to no humor) did not increase participants’ attraction to the group. But it increased perceived cohesion among other group members and the perception that other group members felt safer and were more similar to each other. Even when procedures were altered in Study 2 to reduce participants’ evaluation apprehension and their potential anxiety about not themselves being humorous, we found the same pattern of results. We discuss which conditions might be necessary for put-down humor to increase one’s personal attraction to a group.