Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
Has Fulltext
- no (29)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (29)
Keywords
- Physiotherapie (10)
- Schwindel (8)
- Primärversorgung (4)
- Versorgungspfad (4)
- Vertigo (4)
- Aged (3)
- Dizziness (3)
- Gleichgewichtsstörung (3)
- Inanspruchnahme (3)
- Kohortenstudie (3)
- Leitlinie (3)
- Critical pathways (2)
- General practitioners (2)
- Hemiparesis (2)
- Implementation science (2)
- Komplexe Intervention (2)
- Mobility (2)
- Mobilität (2)
- Multiple Sklerose (2)
- Multizentrische randomisierte kontrollierte Studie (2)
- Physical therapy modalities (2)
- Primary health care (2)
- Roboterunterstützte Gangtherapie (2)
- Aged, 80 and over (1)
- Assisted Active Cycling (1)
- Assisted active cycling (1)
- Ausbildung Physiotherapie (1)
- Balance disorder (1)
- Balance und Gang (1)
- Care pathway (1)
- Cerebral palsy (1)
- Clinical Reasoning (1)
- Complex intervention (1)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (1)
- Critical Pathways (1)
- Dizziness, (1)
- Evidenzbasierte Praxis (1)
- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (1)
- Expertenbefragung (1)
- FH Personal (1)
- Feasibility studies (1)
- Functional Electrical Stimulation (1)
- Functional electrical stimulation (1)
- Funktionsfähigkeit mit MS (1)
- Förderkonzept (1)
- Gait analysis (1)
- Gait profile score (1)
- General Practitioners (1)
- Handlungsempfehlung (1)
- ICF- Kategorien (1)
- Implementation Science (1)
- Implementation strategies (1)
- Knowledge translation strategies (1)
- Manuelle Therapie (1)
- Mobility limitation (1)
- Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial (1)
- Nervous system diseases (1)
- Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (1)
- Personalentwicklung (1)
- Physical Therapy Modalities (1)
- Physiotherapeutische Intervention (1)
- Physiotherapie bei MS (1)
- Physiotherapy (1)
- Pilot randomized controlled trial (1)
- Postural balance (1)
- Primary Health Care (1)
- Primary care (1)
- Professionalisierung der PT (1)
- Pusher- Symptomatik (1)
- Randomisiert kontrollierte Pilotstudie (1)
- Randomisiert kontrollierte Therapiestudie (1)
- Randomized controlled pilot study (1)
- Rehabilitation outcome (1)
- Robot-assisted gait training (1)
- Schlaganfall (1)
- Schulung (1)
- Schwindel- und Gleichgewichtsstörungen (1)
- Social participation (1)
- Subacute stroke (1)
- Subacute stroke patients (1)
- Systematic review (1)
- Therapeutic Effects (1)
- Treatment outcome (1)
- Versorgungsforschung (1)
- Virtual Reality (1)
- Virtual reality (1)
- cluster-RCT (1)
- evidenzbasierter Versorgungspfad (1)
- komplexe Intervention (1)
- primary care (1)
- process evaluation (1)
- professorales Personal (1)
- vertigo (1)
BACKGROUND: Active performance is crucial for motor learning, and, together with motivation, is believed to be associated with a better rehabilitation outcome. Virtual reality (VR) is an innovative approach to engage and motivate patients during training. There is promising evidence for its efficiency in retraining upper limb function. However, there is insufficient proof for its effectiveness in gait training.
AIM: To evaluate the acceptability of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) with and without VR and the feasibility of potential outcome measures to guide the planning of a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT).
DESIGN: Single-blind randomized controlled pilot trial with two parallel arms.
SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital.
POPULATION: Twenty subacute stroke patients (64±9 years) with a Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) ≤2.
METHODS: Twelve sessions (over 4 weeks) of either VR-augmented RAGT (intervention group) or standard RAGT (control group). Acceptability of the interventions (drop-out rate, questionnaire), patients’ motivation (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory [IMI], individual mean walking time), and feasibility of potential outcome measures (completion rate and response to interventions) were determined.
RESULTS: We found high acceptability of repetitive VR-augmented RAGT. The drop-out rate was 1/11 in the intervention and 4/14 in the control group. Patients of the intervention group spent significantly more time walking in the robot than the control group (per session and total walking time; P<0.03). In both groups, motivation measured with the IMI was high over the entire intervention period. The felt pressure and tension significantly decreased in the intervention group (P<0.01) and was significantly lower than in the control group at the last therapy session (r=-0.66, P=0.005). The FAC is suggested as a potential primary outcome measure for a definitive RCT, as it could be assessed in all patients and showed significant response to interventions (P<0.01). We estimated a sample size of 44 for a future RCT.
CONCLUSIONS: VR-augmented RAGT resulted in high acceptability and motivation, and in a reduced drop-out rate and an extended training time compared to standard RAGT. This pilot trial provides guidance for a prospective RCT on the effectiveness of VR-augmented RAGT.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: VR might be a promising approach to enrich and improve gait rehabilitation after stroke.