Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (peer reviewed) (84)
- Other (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (88)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (88)
Keywords
- ICF (13)
- Rehabilitation (12)
- Disability and health (10)
- International Classification of Functioning (6)
- Rasch analysis (5)
- International classification of functioning (4)
- Outcome measures (4)
- rehabilitation (4)
- Cohort study (3)
- Comparability (3)
- Employment (3)
- Functional status (3)
- Health information systems (3)
- International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (3)
- Occupational science (3)
- Patient perspective (3)
- Rheumatoid arthritis (3)
- Ruling relations (3)
- Spinal cord injury (3)
- Epidemiology (2)
- Functioning information (2)
- Gender (2)
- Health (2)
- Institutional Ethnography (2)
- International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (2)
- Interrater reliability (2)
- Occupational balance (2)
- Psychomatrics (2)
- Psychometrics (2)
- Quality improvement (2)
- Rasch model (2)
- Standardization (2)
- Standpoint (2)
- Systematic Review (2)
- WHODAS 2.0 (2)
- assessment instruments (2)
- psychometrics (2)
- spinal cord injury (2)
- transition to nursing home (2)
- Activities of daily living (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Autoimmune disease (1)
- Barthel Index; Functional Independence Measure; Rasch Measurement Model; activities of daily living; outcome assessment (healthcare); psychometrics; quality in healthcare; rehabilitation. (1)
- Casemix (1)
- Cerebral palsy (1)
- Classification (1)
- Clinical Decision Rules (1)
- Clinical tool (1)
- Common metric (1)
- Common metric; DASH; Disability and Health; HAQ; International Classification of Functioning; Multidimensional HAQ; PROMIS-SF; Rasch measurement model; Scale banking; WHODAS 2.0; WOMAC. (1)
- Comparability of spinal cord injury (1)
- Consensus method (1)
- Contextual factors (1)
- Critical reflexivity (1)
- DAG (directed acrylic graph) (1)
- DASH (1)
- DRG (1)
- Daily life (1)
- Database Searching (1)
- Decision making (1)
- Delivery of Healthcare (1)
- Delivery of health care (1)
- Descriptive (1)
- Developing country (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Differential item functioning (DIF) (1)
- Disability Evaluation (1)
- Disability and Health (1)
- Documentation (1)
- EQ-5D (1)
- Electronic health records (1)
- Enabling occupation (1)
- Environmental factors (1)
- Epistemic community (1)
- Evaluation (1)
- Everyday activities (1)
- Evidence base (1)
- FIM; Functional Independence Measure; HAQ; Health Assessment Questionnaire; WHODAS 2.0; World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; outcome assessment; rheumatoid arthritis; stroke; psychometrics. (1)
- Feminist critiques on health care (1)
- Fibromyalgia (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Functional Independence Measure (1)
- Functioning in daily life (1)
- G-DRG System (1)
- GOBI study (1)
- HAQ (1)
- Hand osteoarthritis (1)
- Health care (1)
- Health care provision (1)
- Health care terminology (1)
- Health classification (1)
- Health information system evaluation (1)
- Health status measurement (1)
- Health survey (1)
- Health systems (1)
- ICF Rehabilitation Set (1)
- ICF Rehabilitation Set category (1)
- ICF rehabilitation set (1)
- Immunology (1)
- Imputation techniques (1)
- Independence (1)
- Inflammatory markers (1)
- Information standards (1)
- Information systems (1)
- Informed decision-making (1)
- Inpatient care (1)
- Institutional ethnography (1)
- Intellectual Disability (1)
- Interdisciplinary Communication (1)
- International Classification of Diseases (1)
- International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (1)
- International Spinal Cord Injury (1)
- Italian Rehabilitation Community (1)
- Knowledge base (1)
- Knowledge development (1)
- Knowledge generation (1)
- Labor market office (1)
- Latent class analysis (1)
- Lived experience (1)
- Local item dependencies (LID) (1)
- Logistic models (1)
- Longitudinal studies (1)
- Low Back Pain (1)
- Low back pain , International Classification of Functioning , Disability and Health , Musculoskeletal Manipulations , Disability Evaluation (1)
- Lupus erythematous (1)
- MTT assay (1)
- Measure (1)
- Measuring functioning (1)
- Medical Informatics (1)
- Metrics (1)
- Models (1)
- Multi-centre study (1)
- Multidimensional HAQ (1)
- Musculoskeletal Manipulations (1)
- Narratives (1)
- Observational study (1)
- Occupational Therapy (1)
- Occupational therapy (1)
- Occupational transitions (1)
- Ontology of the social (1)
- Osteoarthritis (1)
- Outcome assessment (1)
- Oxford hip score (1)
- Oxford knee score (1)
- PROMIS-SF (1)
- Participation (1)
- Patient Delphi exercise (1)
- Patient outcome assessment (1)
- Patient's perspective (1)
- Person-centeredness (1)
- Pervasive developmental disorder (1)
- Pflegeheimeinzug (1)
- Policies (1)
- Power (1)
- Practicing standards (1)
- Prognosis (1)
- Psychometric Analysis (1)
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (1)
- Qualitative multicentre study (1)
- Qualitative research (1)
- Quality management (1)
- Quality of health care (1)
- Quality registry (1)
- Rasch measurement model (1)
- Reference standards (1)
- Rehab-Cycle (1)
- Rehabilitation services (1)
- Reliability (1)
- Reproducibility of results (1)
- Ressource utilization (1)
- Return to work (1)
- Rheuma (1)
- Rheumatiod arthritis (1)
- Rheumatology (1)
- SCI (Spinal cord injuries) (1)
- SF-36 (1)
- Scale banking (1)
- Scoping review (1)
- Secondary analysis (1)
- Semi-structured interviews (1)
- Sensitivity to change (1)
- Simple, intuitive descriptions (1)
- Social organization (1)
- Sociology of the profession (1)
- Spina bifida (myelomeningocele, MMC) (1)
- Spinal Cord Injuries (1)
- Spinal cord injuries (1)
- Spinal curd injury (1)
- Stakeholder interviews (1)
- Standardisation (1)
- Standardized Reporting (1)
- Standpoint theory (1)
- Systemic lupus erythematosus (1)
- Textual analysis (1)
- Theory Classification internationale du fonctionnement, handicap et santé (1)
- Théorie (1)
- Total quality management (1)
- WOMAC (1)
- Women (1)
- Work (1)
- Work disparities (1)
- Workers with injury (1)
- activities of daily living (1)
- affect (1)
- against racism (1)
- assessment (1)
- biographic narrative (1)
- case study (1)
- competitive work (1)
- disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (1)
- disability and health (1)
- documentation (1)
- electronic health records (1)
- fibromyalgia (1)
- fragmentation of care (1)
- functioning information (1)
- health service delivery (1)
- health status (1)
- institutional ethnography (1)
- international classification of functioning (1)
- international classification of functioning, disability and health (1)
- occupation (1)
- occupational justice (1)
- occupational therapy (1)
- outcome assessment (1)
- outcome assessment (health care) (1)
- outcome measure (1)
- patient-reported outcome measures (1)
- patient’s needs (1)
- personality (1)
- pre-vocational requisites (1)
- psychological factors (1)
- public reporting of healthcare data (1)
- quality management (1)
- quality of health care (1)
- rehabilitation services (1)
- reliability (1)
- rheumatoid arthritis (1)
- sociology of knowledge (1)
- spinal cord injury (SCI) (1)
- validity (1)
- Évaluation (1)
Institute
- Fakultät für Angewandte Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften (88) (remove)
Introduction: The aim of this review was to gain an understanding of the first 20 years of contributions to WORK within the assessment domain and to reflect on the perspectives underscoring this knowledge base.
Method: A narrative review of assessment articles using the WORK ARTicle database was conducted. Assessment articles were searched using issues from 1990 to 2009. Descriptive data was analyzed to examine historical trends of the specific types and dimensions of articles, the regional location of the contributions, and the methodological accordance. A reflective process was used by an editorial board member of WORK to inductively interpret perspectives and contextual issues that underpinned the evolution of the assessment domain in WORK.
Results: Over half of N= 108 of the articles on assessment in WORK focused on establishing or reporting reliability and validity of assessments used in clinical practice or evaluation research. The majority of the assessment articles were predominantly focused on the person. Contributions of articles were from 5 regions: North America, Europe, Australia, Asia and Africa.
Conclusions: Assessment articles in WORK have contributed to the development of evidence to support assessment of the worker. These articles represent a knowledge base that emphasizes evidence-based assessments to evaluate what a person can and cannot do to participate in work. Efforts are needed to expand knowledge generation in assessment to include more evaluations on the workplace and occupation dimensions, and that also considers the worker in context.
Objective: Many studies published in the journal WORK in the recent decades have discussed work and employment trends. However, the dimensions of these contributions over time have not been reviewed. The main objective of this study was to investigate the knowledge development in regard to work-related rehabilitation in WORK over the last two decades.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the following five stages: (i) identifying research question, (ii) identifying relevant studies, (iii) study selection, (iv) charting, summarizing, and collating the data, and (v) reporting the results. Studies were selected from the WORK Article Database.
Results: Seventy-five relevant studies were identified. The findings reflect that WORK has published papers from across the world, with most of the studies from the United States, Sweden, Canada, and Hong Kong. The complexity and multi-factorial nature of work-related rehabilitation was reflected in the application of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method research approaches, as well as case studies. Study participants were characterized by work, and non-work related injuries, systematic diseases/chronic illness, fulfilled certain socio-demographic characteristic, and represented various stakeholders. Fewer studies drew on secondary resources. In the findings one re-occurring theme has been noted: 'maintaining/obtaining/returning to secure and stable employment/work'.
Conclusions: Four key-reflections evolved from this scoping review that provide potential avenues for future research. These key-reflections include (i) the national, transnational and international dimension of the reviewed studies, (ii) the various societal levels informing work-related rehabilitation practices, (iii) the diversity of methodologies applied in current research, and (iv) the variability of terminology used within the reviewed studies. The journal WORK has published a variety of research over the last two decades and contributed significantly to our current understanding of work-related rehabilitation. However, further research in these reflective areas would expand the current knowledge base.
The aim of this secondary analysis is to explicate taken-for-granted practices in the health care system in which the life stories of six women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are embedded. A secondary analysis of life stories of six women with RA, which were assigned to a typology named "rheumatoid arthritis as a source for new challenges" (STAMM et al., 2008) in the primary narrative study, was conducted. The theoretical framework applied for the analysis was informed by feminist standpoint theory and feminist philosophy. In the present analysis, each of the women challenged established health care practices and the cognitive authority of medicine at a certain point in their life story reflections. Becoming more conscious about health care practices enabled the women to acknowledge their own knowledge and to make choices about their health. The findings challenge health care providers to engage in critical reflexivity to become conscious about and to transform taken-for-granted practices as embedded in larger systems and to create health care environments that enable dialogue between clients and health care providers.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore how contextual factors affect the everyday activities of women and men with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as evident in their life stories.
Methods: Fifteen people with RA, who had retired early due to the disease, were interviewed up to three times, according to a narrative biographic interview style. The life stories of the participants, which were reconstructed from the biographical data and from the transcribed ‘told story’ were analysed from the perspective of contextual factors, including personal and environmental factors. The rigour and accuracy of the analysis were enhanced by reflexivity and peer‐review of the results.
Results: The life stories of the participants in this study reflected how contextual factors (such as gender, the healthcare system, the support of families and social and cultural values) shaped their everyday activities. In a society such as in Austria, which is based on traditional patriarchal values, men were presented with difficulties in developing a non‐paid‐work‐related role. For women, if paid work had to be given up, they were more likely to engage in alternative challenging activities which enabled them to develop reflective skills, which in turn contributed to a positive and enriching perspective on their life stories. Health professionals may thus use some of the women's strategies to help men.
Conclusion: Interventions by health professionals in people with RA may benefit from an approach sensitive to personal and environmental factors.
Purpose: This study aimed to gain knowledge about environmental factors (EFs) that impact work and social life participation of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Austria and Switzerland to extend the knowledge of participation and to identify key areas for measuring participation.
Method: A three-round Delphi study was conducted defining patients as experts. In the 1st round, qualitative data was gathered through questionnaires, analyzed with content analysis, and factors were assigned to EFs as classified in the ICF. In the 2nd and 3rd round, experts judged EFs according to its relevance to obtain consensus (cut-off 75%). Categories were ranked on a scale from mostly important to important.
Results: One hundred and twelve Austrian and 109 Swiss experts were recruited. The content analysis revealed 768 EFs. The study resulted in a list of 176 consensus factors for Austria and 177 Switzerland. Five categories revealed to be highly important, 12 moderately important, 6 fairly important, and 10 important.
Conclusions: This study indicates that participation in work or social life is influenced by physical, social, attitudinal, and policy factors. Consensus factors afford insights into areas for consideration in the development of participation outcome measurements and support a comprehensive and inclusive rehabilitation approach.
Objective
To identify the most important and relevant concepts of daily functioning from the perspective of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods
We conducted a consensus‐building, 3‐round, electronic mail survey with SLE patients using the Delphi technique. The Delphi technique is a structured communication process with 4 key characteristics: anonymity, iteration with controlled feedback, statistical group response, and informed input. The concepts contained in the answers of the patients were extracted and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Results
Of the total 225 participants, 194 (86.2%) completed the questionnaires from all 3 Delphi rounds. In total, after the third Delphi round, 307 concepts were identified. Ninety concepts (55 in the domain body functions and structures, 16 in activities and participation, and 19 in environmental factors) were considered relevant by at least 50% of the participants in the third round and linked to the ICF. Twelve concepts were considered important by at least 75% of the participants.
Conclusion
The high number of concepts resulting from this large‐scale patient Delphi approach underlines the great variety of SLE patients' problems in daily functioning. The results of this patient Delphi project supplement the findings of our focus‐group study in establishing a comprehensive overview of the patient perspective in SLE.
Objective: To explore whether the concepts important to patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA) are covered by the most commonly used instruments measuring functioning.
Method: A qualitative multicentre study using a focus group technique was performed in five European countries: Austria, The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The qualitative data analysis followed a modified form of “meaning condensation” and used the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a theoretical framework. Finally, the concepts from the focus groups were compared with the content of the most commonly used instruments which had been identified in an earlier theoretical analysis.
Results: Fifty-six people (51 women, mean (SD) age 62.7 (7.9) years) with hand OA participated in this study in two focus groups per centre. 63 concepts were extracted from the focus groups. Twenty-one (33%) of the 63 concepts were covered by at least one instrument. Psychological consequences, different qualities of pain, aesthetic changes and leisure activities are important concepts from the focus groups which were not covered by the instruments. The qualitative analysis revealed detailed descriptions of pain-concerning sensations, levels and a certain relation to activity, none of which were fully represented in the instruments routinely used.
Conclusion: It was possible to combine the concepts of the focus groups from each centre into a common qualitative analysis. The concepts important to people with hand OA are not fully represented in the most commonly used instruments.
Objective
To analyze the content of outcome measures commonly used to assess health in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) by linking the items of the instruments with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to evaluate the adequacy of currently used measures.
Methods
Questionnaires used in FM were identified in a structured literature search. All concepts included in the items of the questionnaires were linked to ICF categories, according to previously published linking rules, by 2 independent health professionals. The percentages of linked ICF categories addressing the different ICF components were calculated.
Results
Generic and symptom‐specific instruments were included. From the 296 items contained in all 16 instruments, 447 concepts were extracted and then linked to 52 ICF categories of the component body functions, 1 category of the component body structure, 40 categories of the component activities and participation, and 9 categories of the component environmental factors. More than half of the concepts identified were linked to body function, fewer were linked to activities and participation, and only concepts of 4 instruments were linked to the ICF component environmental factors.
Conclusion
Many concepts were linked to the categories in the ICF component body functions. While linking to the broad category, purportedly similar instruments often covered widely varying areas of function at more fine‐grained levels of detail. Some categories, such as environmental factors, were barely covered by any of the instruments and might constitute an important aspect of health deserving better coverage and future development.