Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (peer reviewed) (51)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
- Other (6)
- Contribution to a Periodical (4)
Has Fulltext
- no (70)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (70)
Keywords
- Vertigo (12)
- Dizziness (11)
- Aged (8)
- Schwindel (8)
- ICF (7)
- Physiotherapie (7)
- outcome assessment (7)
- Classification (6)
- Quality of life (6)
- Contractures (5)
- Nursing homes (5)
- Complex intervention (4)
- Health status measurements (4)
- Primärversorgung (4)
- Rehabilitation (4)
- Versorgungspfad (4)
- joint contracture (4)
- social participation (4)
- Gleichgewichtsstörung (3)
- Inanspruchnahme (3)
- Joint contractures (3)
- Kohortenstudie (3)
- Leitlinie (3)
- Participation (3)
- Primary health care (3)
- Social participation (3)
- disability (3)
- regression analysis (3)
- vertigo (3)
- Activities of daily living (2)
- Aged 80 and over (2)
- Cohort study (2)
- Critical pathways (2)
- Disability evaluation (2)
- General practitioners (2)
- Implementation science (2)
- Intensive care (2)
- Komplexe Intervention (2)
- Mobilität (2)
- Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial (2)
- Multizentrische randomisierte kontrollierte Studie (2)
- Outcome assessment (2)
- Physical therapy modalities (2)
- aged (2)
- disabled persons (2)
- dizziness (2)
- participation (2)
- transition to nursing home (2)
- 80 and over (1)
- Activities (1)
- Advance care planning (1)
- Aged and over 80 (1)
- Aged, 80 and over (1)
- Aging (1)
- Akutkrankenhaus (1)
- Assistenten (1)
- Assistenzroboter (1)
- BMC geriatrics (1)
- Balance Disorders (1)
- Balance disorder (1)
- Body Mass Index (1)
- COVID-19-Pandemie (1)
- Care pathway (1)
- Chronic Condition (1)
- Clinical (1)
- Cluster-randomised controlled trials (1)
- Cluster-randomised pilot trial (1)
- Cognitive Interview (1)
- Cohort Study (1)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (1)
- Core Sets (1)
- Coronary Problem (1)
- Critical Pathways (1)
- Disability and Health (ICF) (1)
- Disability and health (1)
- Disease Interaction (1)
- Disorder of consciousness (1)
- Dizziness, (1)
- Duales Pflegestudium (1)
- ECG abnormalities (1)
- Electrocardiography (1)
- Evidence- based medicine (1)
- Evidenzbasierte Praxis (1)
- Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (1)
- Feasibility studies (1)
- Feasibility trial (1)
- General Practitioners (1)
- General practitioner (1)
- Geriatric assessment (1)
- Geriatric rehabilitation (1)
- Geriatrics (1)
- Handlungsempfehlung (1)
- Harvest plot (1)
- Health (1)
- Implementation (1)
- Implementation Science (1)
- Implementation strategies (1)
- Implementation strategy (1)
- Intensive Care (1)
- International Classification of Functioning (1)
- Intervention (1)
- KORA Study (1)
- Knowledge translation strategies (1)
- Krankenhäuser (1)
- Long-term care (1)
- Minimaly conscious state (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobility limitation (1)
- Multimorbidity (1)
- Nervous system diseases (1)
- Osteoarthritis (1)
- Outcome (1)
- Pflege (1)
- Pflegeausbildung (1)
- Pflegebedürftigkeit (1)
- Pflegeheimeinzug (1)
- Pflegemanagement (1)
- Pflegestudium (1)
- Pflegewissenschaft (1)
- Physical Therapy Modalities (1)
- Physiotherapeutische Intervention (1)
- Physiotherapy (1)
- Pilot study (1)
- Postural balance (1)
- Pretest (1)
- Primary Health Care (1)
- Primary care (1)
- Process evaluation (1)
- Qualitative study (1)
- Questionnaire Respondent (1)
- Questionnaire development (1)
- Rationierung (1)
- Regression analysis (1)
- Robotik (1)
- Robotik in der Pflege (1)
- Schulung (1)
- Schwindel- und Gleichgewichtsstörungen (1)
- Systematic review (1)
- Treatment outcome (1)
- Utilization (1)
- Vegetative state (1)
- Versorgungsforschung (1)
- Wissenschaft (1)
- Wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchs, Pflegewissenschaft, Karrierewege, Karrieretypen, Professuren, Grounded Theory Methodologie (1)
- acrophobia (1)
- activities of daily living (1)
- anxiety (1)
- autonomy (1)
- chronic conditions (1)
- cluster-RCT (1)
- complex interventions (1)
- cross-sectional studies (1)
- cross-sectional study (1)
- directed acrylic graph (1)
- disability evaluation (1)
- elderly (1)
- evidenzbasierter Versorgungspfad (1)
- fear of heigts (1)
- geriatric rehabilitation (1)
- komplexe Intervention (1)
- muscle spasticity (1)
- nursing (1)
- older people (1)
- physical activity (1)
- primary care (1)
- process evaluation (1)
- qualitative Studie (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- rehabilitation (1)
- robotic device (1)
- ultrasonography (1)
- visual height intolerance (1)
- wissenschaftliche Karrieren in der Pflege (1)
- Übergänge (1)
Hintergrund
Schwindel und/oder Gleichgewichtsstörungen (S/G) sind komplexe Gesundheitsprobleme bei älteren Menschen und häufige Beratungsanlässe in der Hausarztpraxis. Physiotherapie kann einen positiven Einfluss auf das Gleichgewicht und Sturzrisiko bei Patient*innen mit S/G haben. In der S3-DEGAM-Leitlinie „Akuter Schwindel in der Hausarztpraxis“ werden Empfehlungen für Physiotherapie bei bestimmten Schwindeldiagnosen gegeben. Ob hausärztliche Physiotherapieverordnungen den Empfehlungen der Leitlinie entsprechen, ist nicht bekannt. Bisher liegen keine Daten vor, wie häufig diese Physiotherapieverordnungen tatsächlich durch Patient*innen in Anspruch genommen werden.
Ziel
Ermittlung von Anteil und Inanspruchnahme hausärztlich verordneter Physiotherapie bei älteren Patient*innen mit S/G innerhalb der Kohortenstudie MobilE-TRA und Untersuchung, ob diese den Empfehlungen der S3-DEGAM-Leitlinie entsprechen.
Methode
Die Sekundäranalyse beruht auf Daten der Kohortenstudie MobilE-TRA, in der Patient*innen ab 65 Jahren mit S/G in 17 Hausarztpraxen in Bayern und Sachsen befragt wurden. Die Datenerhebung fand von 09/2017–10/2019 statt. Die hausärztliche Verordnung und patientenseitige Inanspruchnahme von Physiotherapie wurden mittels validierten sowie selbstentwickelten Fragebögen erhoben. Die Daten wurden deskriptiv (Mittelwerte, Häufigkeiten) und Verteilungsunterschiede mittels exaktem Test nach Fisher analysiert.
Ergebnisse
Die Stichprobe umfasste 158 Patient*innen mit S/G. 16 % der Patient*innen hatten aufgrund von S/G Physiotherapie verordnet bekommen. Dabei entsprachen 14,2 % der Physiotherapieverordnungen den Empfehlungen der S3-DEGAM-Leitlinie. 32 % (Bayern 53,8 %; Sachsen 8,3 %) der Patient*innen hatten die Physiotherapie nicht in Anspruch genommen. Dabei lag ein signifikanter regionaler Verteilungsunterschied (p = 0,030; Phi = 0,487 [95 % KI = 0,129–0,846]) vor.
Schlussfolgerung
Mit 16 % ist die Häufigkeit hausärztlicher Physiotherapieverordnungen bei S/G in der Altersgruppe der über 65-Jährigen vergleichsweise hoch. Die Gründe für die Nichtinanspruchnahme wurden nicht erfasst, weshalb nur Vermutungen bezüglich des regionalen Unterschiedes angestellt werden konnten (z. B. Verfügbarkeit von Physiotherapie). Im Sinne der Planung einer adhärenten Therapie und zur Vermeidung von Versorgungsunterschieden scheint es sinnvoll, sich zukünftig auch mit Gründen einer Nichtinanspruchnahme von Therapien zu beschäftigen.
Hintergrund
Schwindel und/oder Gleichgewichtsstörungen (SG) sind häufige Symptome bei älteren Menschen und beeinträchtigen das tägliche Leben erheblich. Physiotherapie kann eine wichtige Komponente in der Behandlung von SG sein. Aufgrund der multifaktoriellen Ursachen sind die physiotherapeutische Diagnostik und Therapie komplex, werden aber in der Ausbildung kaum thematisiert. Klar strukturierte und evidenzbasierte Schulungen für die differentialdiagnostische Herangehensweise können den Clinical-Reasoning-Prozess und die Therapie von SG verbessern. Eine entsprechende evidenzbasierte Schulung wurde in einem Interventionszweig der multizentrischen Cluster-RCT MobilE-PHY2 begleitend zu einem Decision Tree (DT) für den Clinical-Reasoning-Prozess in der Physiotherapie konzipiert und durchgeführt.
Methodik
Die Schulung wurde aus den Ergebnissen der Pilotstudie (MobilE-PHY1) und deren Prozessevaluation sowie auf der Grundlage einer dreitägigen Fortbildung von und mit einem Schwindelexperten entwickelt. Inhalte waren die Anwendung des DT, theoretische Grundlagen über Schwindel sowie praktische Übungsanteile. Bei der eintägigen Schulung konnten die Physiotherapeut*innen entweder online oder in Präsenz teilnehmen. Zudem wurde eine Online-Lernplattform bereitgestellt, die neben umfassendem Vor- und Nachbereitungsmaterial die Möglichkeit bot, Feedback z. B. in Form einer Videoanalyse zu bekommen. Die Evaluation erfolgte durch Fragebögen und leitfadengestützte Interviews und ist Teil der Prozessevaluation von MobilE-PHY2. Die Auswertung ab Juni 2023 wird im Mixed-Methods-Design nach Rädiker stattfinden.
Ergebnis und Schlussfolgerung
Es konnten neun Physiotherapiepraxen am Studienstandort Bayern in die Studie eingeschlossen werden. Aus diesen nahmen 17 Therapeut*innen an den insgesamt drei Schulungen teil. Es wurden zehn Therapeut*innen online und sieben in Präsenz geschult. Basierend auf Interviews mit sechs Therapeut*innen sowie dreizehn Fragebögen werden wichtige Erkenntnisse gewonnen, inwiefern die Schulung (begleitend zum DT) eine geeignete Methode darstellt, die evidenzbasierte physiotherapeutische Versorgung für Patient*innen mit SG zu verbessern. Zudem können Vor- und Nachteile der Online- und Präsenzlehre diskutiert werden.
BACKGROUND
Vertigo, dizziness or balance disorders (VDB) affect the mobility and participation of many older people and are also one of the most frequent reasons for visiting the general practitioner's (GP) practice due to multifactorial causes. Physiotherapy (PT) can be crucial for the complex care of people with VDB but is rarely prescribed by GPs. So we developed an evidence-based, multidisciplinary care pathway as a complex intervention following the UK Medical Research Council guideline, which was piloted and is now being evaluated for effectiveness, accompanied by a process evaluation.
METHOD
The care pathway of the multicentre cluster-RCT (MobilE-PHY2) included decision aids and training for PTs and GPs in the intervention group and optimised standard care in the control group. A mixed-methods process evaluation following Grant’s framework for designing process evaluations examined barriers, facilitating factors and mechanisms of impact in recruiting and reaching participants, implementing the intervention and the response of all participants. Therefore, a logic model was developed illustrating the relationship between the planned work to implement the intervention, the expected mechanism of impact (based on the behaviour change wheel as a change theory), the intended results (output, outcome and impact), and categories of possible influencing factors. The underlying assumption is that a behavioural change in PT and GP is a prerequisite for a change in patient behaviour, which can lead to improved mobility and participation (outcome of MobilE-PHY2). Guided interviews were conducted with patients before the intervention and after six months and with PTs and GPs after six months. Additionally, the training evaluations, completed decision aids and structural questionnaires will be analysed from June 2023.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
At one study site, a total of 37 patients, 17 PTs and nine GPs were included. Interviews were conducted with 16 patients, six PTs and GPs. In the intervention group, 12 PTs and 18 GPs completed decision aids, 13 PTs and two GPs completed evaluation forms, and eight PTs and four GPs completed structural data. The preliminary results of the process evaluation will be reported at the Congress. The results are intended to give indications for a broad implementation of the care pathway, including and promoting physiotherapy and therefore contributing to improved evidence-based healthcare for older people with VDB.
Background
The admission to a nursing home is a critical life-event for affected persons as well as their families. Admission related processes are lacking adequate participation of older people and their families. To improve transitions to nursing homes, context- and country-specific knowledge about the current practice is needed. Hence, our aim was to summarize available evidence on challenges and care strategies associated with the admission to nursing homes in Germany.
Methods
We conducted a scoping review and searched eight major international and German-specific electronic databases for journal articles and grey literature published in German or English language since 1995. Further inclusion criteria were focus on challenges or care strategies in the context of nursing home admissions of older persons and comprehensive and replicable information on methods and results. Posters, only-abstract publications and articles dealing with mixed populations including younger adults were excluded. Challenges and care strategies were identified and analysed by structured content analysis using the TRANSCIT model.
Results
Twelve studies of 1,384 records were finally included. Among those, seven were qualitative studies, three quantitative observational studies and two mixed methods studies. As major challenges neglected participation of older people, psychosocial burden among family caregivers, inadequate professional cooperation and a lack of shared decision-making and evidence-based practice were identified. Identified care strategies included strengthening shared decision-making and evidence-based practice, improvement in professional cooperation, introduction of specialized transitional care staff and enabling participation for older people.
Conclusion
Although the process of nursing home admission is considered challenging and tends to neglect the needs of older people, little research is available for the German health care system. The perspective of the older people seems to be underrepresented, as most of the studies focused on caregivers and health professionals. Reported care strategies addressed important challenges, however, these were not developed and evaluated in a comprehensive and systematic way. Future research is needed to examine perspectives of all the involved groups to gain a comprehensive picture of the needs and challenges. Interventions based on existing care strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated to provide the basis of adequate support for older persons and their informal caregivers.
Background
Vertigo, dizziness or balance disorders (VDB) are common leading symptoms in older people, which can have a negative impact on their mobility and participation in daily live, yet, diagnosis is challenging and specific treatment is often insufficient. An evidence-based, multidisciplinary care pathway (CPW) in primary care was developed and pilot tested in a previous study. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the CPW in terms of improving mobility and participation in community-dwelling older people with VDB in primary care.
Methods
For this multicentre cluster randomised controlled clinic trial, general practitioners (GP) will be recruited in two regions of Germany. A total of 120 patients over 60 years old with VDB will be included. The intervention is an algorithmized CPW. GPs receive a checklist for standardise clinical decision making regarding diagnostic screening and treatment of VDB. Physiotherapists (PT) receive a decision tree for evidence-based physiotherapeutic clinical reasoning and treatment of VDB. Implementation strategies comprises educational trainings as well as a workshop to give a platform for exchange for the GPs and PTs, an information meeting and a pocket card for home care nurses and informal caregivers and telephone peer counselling to give all participants the capability, opportunity and the motivation to apply the intervention. In order to ensure an optimised usual care in the control group, GPs get an information meeting addressing the national guideline. The primary outcome is the impact of VDB on participation and mobility of patients after 6 month follow-up, assessed using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are physical activity, static and dynamic balance, falls and fear of falling as well as quality of life. We will also evaluate safety and health economic aspects of the intervention. Behavioural changes of the participants as well as barriers, facilitating factors and mechanisms of impact of the implementation will be investigated with a comprehensive process evaluation in a mixed-methods design.
Discussion
With our results, we aim to improve evidence-based health care of community-dwelling older people with VDB in primary care.
Die Pflegewissenschaft in Deutschland steht vor der Herausforderung, wissenschaftliche Strukturen und Karrierewege auszubilden. Erschwert wird dies durch einen Mangel an wissenschaftlichem Nachwuchs, der das Potential hat, pflegewissenschaftliche Professuren mit wissenschaftlicher Exzellenz und praktischer Erfahrung zu füllen.
Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, darzustellen, was auslösende Momente für wissenschaftliche Karrieren sind, die in Professuren pflegebezogener Studiengänge münden, und welche Kontextbedingungen diese Karrieren beeinflussen. Es soll auch aufgezeigt werden, wie wissenschaftliche Nachwuchskräfte vorgehen, um ihre Ziele zu erreichen und welche Konsequenzen sich daraus für sie und für die Pflegewissenschaft ergeben. Auf dieser Grundlage sollen Empfehlungen für die Nachwuchsförderung entwickelt werden, um mehr geeignete Personen für Professuren in pflegebezogenen Studiengängen zu gewinnen.
Vorhandene Daten teilnarrativer Interviews mit ProfessorInnen (n=11) und Masterstudierenden (n=11) sowie Promovierenden (n=10) pflegebezogener Studiengänge wurden im Rahmen einer retrospektiven Datenanalyse mit dem dreistufigen Codierverfahren der Grounded Theory Methodologie ausgewertet.
Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass in der Pflegepraxis gewonnene Erfahrungen auslösende Momente wissenschaftlicher Karrieren sind. Diese lösen den Drang aus, die dort herrschende Situation zu verändern, wobei sich vier Karrieretypen unterscheiden lassen: Typ A forscht, weil er erlebt hat, dass es für pflegerische Phänomene keine geeigneten Pflegeinterventionen gab. Typ B lehrt, um dazu beizutragen, dass Pflegende zukünftig besser ausgebildet werden. Typ C ist als Pflegeperson von ÄrztInnen nicht ausreichend anerkannt worden und absolviert eine wissenschaftliche Qualifikation, um mit ihnen auf Augenhöhe zu gelangen. Typ D wollte in der Praxis bleiben, ist aber bei Weiterentwicklungsprozessen blockiert worden und nimmt als Kompromiss eine Professur an.
Identifizierte Kontextfaktoren sind u.a. mangelnde Wertschätzung für wissenschaftliches Handeln in der Pflege und das Fehlen von Stellen für hochschulisch qualifizierte Pflegepersonen in der Praxis. Angesichts der bestehenden Bedingungen können hochschulisch qualifizierte Pflegende in der Praxis nicht Fuß fassen. Als Konsequenz für die Pflegewissenschaft als Disziplin zeigt sich, dass in der Pflegepraxis Vorbilder fehlen, die zukünftige Generationen Pflegender dazu anregen könnten, selbst eine wissenschaftliche Karriere in der Pflege einzuschlagen. Dadurch besteht die Gefahr einer Verkümmerung der Pflegewissenschaft.
Auf Grundlage der Ergebnisse wird die durchgängige Implementierung geeigneter Stellen für hochschulisch qualifizierte Pflegepersonen in der Pflegepraxis als Ausgangsbasis wissenschaftlicher Nachwuchsförderung betrachtet. Als Konzept werden Hochschul-Praxis-Partnerschaften skizziert, die beginnend auf Bachelorniveau bis zur Post-doc-Phase Strukturen zu einem systematischen praxisbezogenen wissenschaftlichen Kompetenzauf- und -ausbau für akademisch qualifizierte Pflegende etablieren.
Background
Implementation frameworks may support local implementation strategies with a sound theoretical foundation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) facilitates identification of contextual barriers and facilitators, and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) allows identifying adequate implementation strategies. Both instruments are already used in German-speaking countries; however, no standardised and validated translation is available thus far. The aim of this study was to translate the CFIR and ERIC framework into German, in order to increase the use of these frameworks and the adherence to evidence-based implementation efforts in German-speaking countries.
Methods
The translation of the original versions of the CFIR and ERIC framework was guided by the World Health Organisation’s recommendations for the process of translating and adapting both conceptual frameworks. Accordingly, a four-step process was employed: first, forward translation from English into German was conducted by a research team of German native speakers with fluent knowledge of the English language. Second, a bilingual expert panel comprising one researcher with German as his mother tongue and expert command of the English language and one English language expert and university teacher reviewed the translation and discussed inconsistencies with the initial translators. Third, back-translation into English was conducted by an English native speaking researcher. The final version was pre-tested with 12 German researchers and clinicians who were involved in implementation projects using cognitive interviews.
Results
The translation and review process revealed some inconsistencies between the original version and the German translations. All issues could be solved by discussion. Central aspects of the items were confirmed in 60 to 70% of the items, and modifications were proposed in 30% of the items. Finally, we revised one CFIR-item heading after pre-testing. The final version was given consent by all involved parties.
Conclusions
Now, two validated and tested implementation frameworks to guide implementation efforts are available in the German language and can be used to increase the application of agreed-on implementation strategies into practice.
Background
Community-dwelling older people are frequently affected by vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders (VDB). We previously developed a care pathway (CPW) to improve their mobility and participation by offering standardized approaches for general practitioners (GPs) and physical therapists (PTs). We aimed to assess the feasibility of the intervention, its implementation strategy and the study procedures in preparation for the subsequent main trial.
Methods
This 12-week prospective cohort feasibility study was accompanied by a process evaluation designed according to the UK Medical Research Council’s Guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Patients with VDB (≥65 years), GPs and PTs in primary care were included. The intervention consisted of a diagnostic screening checklist for GPs and a guide for PTs. The implementation strategy included specific educational trainings and a telephone helpline. Data for mixed-method process evaluation were collected via standardized questionnaires, field notes and qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, qualitative data using content analysis.
Results
A total of five GP practices (seven single GPs), 10 PT practices and 22 patients were included in the study. The recruitment of GPs and patients was challenging (response rates: GP practices: 28%, PT practices: 39%). Ninety-one percent of the patients and all health professionals completed the study. The health professionals responded well to the educational trainings; the utilization of the telephone helpline was low (one call each from GPs and PTs). Familiarisation with the routine of application of the intervention and positive attitudes were emphasized as facilitators of the implementation of the intervention, whereas a lack of time was mentioned as a barrier. Despite difficulties in the GPs’ adherence to the intervention protocol, the GPs, PTs and patients saw benefit in the intervention. The patients’ treatment adherence to physical therapy was good. There were minor issues in data collection, but no unintended consequences.
Conclusion
Although the process evaluation provided good support for the feasibility of study procedures, the intervention and its implementation strategy, we identified a need for improvement in recruitment of participants, the GP intervention part and the data collection procedures. The findings will inform the main trial to test the interventions effectiveness in a cluster RCT.
Trial registration
Projektdatenbank Versorgungsforschung Deutschland (German registry Health Services Research) VfD_MobilE-PHY_17_003910, date of registration: 30.11.2017; Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register) DRKS00022918, date of registration: 03.09.2020 (retrospectively registered).
Background
Vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders (VDB) are common in older people and cause restrictions in mobility and social participation. Due to a multifactorial aetiology, health care is often overutilised, but many patients are also treated insufficiently in primary care. The purpose of this study was to develop a care pathway as a complex intervention to improve mobility and participation in older people with VDB in primary care.
Methods
The development process followed the UK Medical Research Council guidance using a mixed-methods design with individual and group interviews carried out with patients, physical therapists (PTs), general practitioners (GPs), nurses working in community care and a multi-professional expert panel to create a first draft of a care pathway (CPW) and implementation strategy using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research and the Expert recommendations for Implementing Change. Subsequently, small expert group modelling of specific components of the CPW was carried out, with GPs, medical specialists and PTs. The Behaviour Change Wheel was applied to design the intervention´s approach to behaviour change. To derive theoretical assumptions, we adopted Kellogg´s Logic Model to consolidate the hypothesized chain of causes leading to patient-relevant outcomes.
Results
Individual interviews with patients showed that VDB symptoms need to be taken more seriously by GPs. Patients demanded age-specific treatment offers, group sessions or a continuous mentoring by a PT. GPs required a specific guideline for diagnostics and treatment options including psychosocial interventions. Specific assignment to and a standardized approach during physical therapy were desired by PTs. Nurses favoured a multi-professional documentation system. The structured three-day expert workshop resulted in a first draft of CPW and potential implementation strategies. Subsequent modelling resulted in a CPW with components and appropriate training materials for involved health professionals. A specific implementation strategy is now available.
Conclusion
A mixed-methods design was suggested to be a suitable approach to develop a complex intervention and its implementation strategy. We will subsequently test the intervention for its acceptability and feasibility in a feasibility study accompanied by a comprehensive process evaluation to inform a subsequent effectiveness trial.
Trial Registration
The research project is registered in “Projektdatenbank Versorgungsforschung Deutschland” (Project-ID: VfD_MobilE-PHY_17_003910; date of registration: 30.11.2017).
Background
Vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders (VDB) are among the most relevant contributors to the burden of disability among older adults living in the community and associated with immobility, limitations of activities of daily living and decreased participation. The aim of this study was to identify the quality of evidence of physical therapy interventions that address mobility and participation in older patients with VDB and to characterize the used primary and secondary outcomes.
Methods
A systematic search via MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PEDro, forward citation tracing and hand search was conducted initially in 11/2017 and updated in 7/2019. We included individual and cluster-randomized controlled trials and trials with quasi-experimental design, published between 2007 and 2017/2019 and including individuals ≥65 years with VDB. Physical therapy and related interventions were reviewed with no restrictions to outcome measurement. Screening of titles, abstracts and full texts, data extraction and critical appraisal was conducted by two independent researchers. The included studies were heterogeneous in terms of interventions and outcome measures. Therefore, a narrative synthesis was conducted.
Results
A total of 20 randomized and 2 non-randomized controlled trials with 1876 patients met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were heterogeneous in terms of complexity of interventions, outcome measures and methodological quality. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) was examined in twelve studies, computer-assisted VR (CAVR) in five, Tai Chi as VR (TCVR) in three, canal repositioning manoeuvres (CRM) in one and manual therapy (MT) in one study. Mixed effects were found regarding body structure/function and activities/participation. Quality of life and/or falls were assessed, with no differences between groups. VR is with moderate quality of evidence superior to usual care to improve balance, mobility and symptoms.
Conclusion
To treat older individuals with VDB, VR in any variation and in addition to CRMs seems to be effective. High-quality randomized trials need to be conducted to inform clinical decision making.
Trial registration
PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017080291.