Refine
Year of publication
- 2007 (3) (remove)
Document Type
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- no (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Automatic Evaluation (2)
- Automatic Speech Recognition (2)
- Acoustic applications (1)
- Biomedical acoustics (1)
- Mono Poly (1)
- Pathologic Speech (1)
- Prosodic Feature (1)
- Speech Recognition System (1)
- Speech Recognizer (1)
- Speech intelligibility (1)
Institute
Previously we have shown that ASR technology can be used to objectively evaluate pathologic speech. Here we report on progress for routine clinical use: 1) We introduce an easy-to-use recording and evaluation environment. 2) We confirm our previous results for a larger group of patients. 3) We show that telephone speech can be analyzed with the same methods with only a small loss of agreement with human experts. 4) We show that prosodic information leads to more robust results. 5) We show that text reference instead of transliteration can be used for evaluation. Using word accuracy of a speech recognizer and prosodic features as features for SVM regression, we achieve a correlation of .90 between the automatic analysis and human experts.
Tracheoesophageal (TE) speech is a possibility to restore the ability to speak after total laryngectomy, i.e. the removal of the larynx. The quality of the substitute voice has to be evaluated during therapy. For the intelligibility evaluation of German speakers over telephone, the Post-Laryngectomy Telephone Test (PLTT) was defined. Each patient reads out 20 of 400 different monosyllabic words and 5 out of 100 sentences. A human listener writes down the words and sentences understood and computes an overall score. This paper presents a means of objective and automatic evaluation that can replace the subjective method. The scores of 11 naïve raters for a set of 31 test speakers were compared to the word recognition rate of speech recognizers. Correlation values of about 0.9 were reached.
For many aspects of speech therapy an objective evaluation of the intelligibility of a patient's speech is needed. We investigate the evaluation of the intelligibility of speech by means of automatic speech recognition. Previous studies have shown that measures like word accuracy are consistent with human experts' ratings. To ease the patient's burden, it is highly desirable to conduct the assessment via phone. However, the telephone channel influences the quality of the speech signal which negatively affects the results. To reduce inaccuracies, we propose a combination of two speech recognizers. Experiments on two sets of pathological speech show that the combination results in consistent improvements in the correlation between the automatic evaluation and the ratings by human experts. Furthermore, the approach leads to reductions of 10% and 25% of the maximum error of the intelligibility measure.