TY - JOUR A1 - Bäuml, Karl-Heinz A1 - Aslan, Alp T1 - Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition JF - Memory & Cognition N2 - The reexposure of a subset of learned material as a retrieval cue can impair recall of the remaining material. Like part-list relearning—the reexposure of learned material for additional learning—this part-list cuing is often assumed to be the result of output order biases at test, caused by the increased strength of the reexposed material. We directly compared the effects of cuing and relearning when controlling for output order biases. In addition, we compared the two forms of reexposure with the effect of part-list retrieval. Both part-list cuing and part-list retrieval reduced recall performance for the remaining material. By contrast, part-list relearning had no such detrimental effect. These results indicate that the effect of reexposure depends on whether material is reexposed as a cue or for relearning, suggesting that part-list cuing reflects an instructional effect. Evidence is provided that part-list cuing leads to instructed covert retrieval of cue items and causes retrieval inhibition of noncue items, similar to how overt retrieval inhibits nonretrieved items. KW - Target Item KW - Delay Condition KW - Retrieval Practice KW - Strategy Disruption KW - Weak Item Y1 - 2021 UR - https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195852 VL - 32 IS - 4 SP - 610 EP - 617 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Aslan, Alp A1 - Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T1 - Part-list cuing with and without item-specific probes: The role of encoding JF - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review N2 - Part-list cuing—the detrimental effect of the presentation of a subset of studied items on recall of the remaining noncue items—was examined in three different study conditions and in the presence and absence of the noncues’ initial letters serving as item-specific probes. With a single study trial, part-list cuing was observed both with and without item-specific probes. By contrast, when participants received two study-test cycles or interrelated list items to a common story, part-list cues were found to be detrimental only in the absence of item-specific probes, but not in their presence. These results indicate that the role of item-specific probes in part-list cuing depends on encoding. The findings are consistent with a recent two-mechanism account of part-list cuing (Bäuml & Aslan, 2006), according to which two different mechanisms mediate the effect in different encoding situations. KW - False Memory KW - Output Interference KW - Strategy Disruption KW - Retrieval Inhibition KW - Interitem Association Y1 - 2021 UR - https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194095 VL - 14 IS - 3 SP - 489 EP - 494 ER -