<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>3129</id>
    <completedYear>2025</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>7</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>7</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>IOP Science</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>2025-12-03</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Circular economy in life cycle costing: a literature review in the construction sector</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Circular economy (CE) has become important in reducing the environmental impact of the construction sector. For the transformation from linear to CE, decision support tools and methods are needed to assess and promote CE for constructions. With regard to sustainable financial decisions, life cycle costing (LCC) is the preferred method. However, the LCC approaches and their application in CE research differ. Based on a systematic literature review,&#13;
the relevance of refurbishment in operation, reuse, recycling and disposal at end-of-life (EoL) in LCC is assessed. As a result, LCC has gained relevance in the construction sector, but CE plays a subordinate role in LCC applications. Costs or benefits of CE are often neglected. However, some research have shown that refurbishment as well as reuse and recycling can outweigh higher initial cost over lifetime. The internalisation of environmental and social impacts or even benefits are also rare. In particular, there is a lack of research on how to internalise the environmental benefits of refurbishment, reuse and recycling or how to effectively incentivise higher CE efforts in LCC in order to encourage decision-making in construction towards CE.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Physics: Conference Series</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1088/1742-6596/3140/13/132012</identifier>
    <enrichment key="PeerReviewed">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_Acronym">HoBio</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_Correlation">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_ProjectTitle">Wood-based bioeconomy</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_FundingAgency">Bavarian Ministry of Science and Arts</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="OpusConferenceName">CISBAT 2025</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="conference_date">5th September 2025</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="OpusConferencePlace">Lausanne</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="review.accepted_by">2</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Sandra Krommes</author>
    <author>Gretel Huber</author>
    <author>Theresa Pscherer</author>
    <author>Isabell Nemeth</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Life Cycle Costing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>LCC</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>construction</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>end-of-life</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>EoL</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="600">Technik, Technologie</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Angewandte Natur- und Geisteswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Rosenheim</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
