<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>2302</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>3</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>3</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>ACIEK Conference</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Service Robots as Co-workers in Elderly Care: Exploratory Re-search on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The pandemic has highlighted the fact that healthcare systems around the world are under pressure. Demographic change is leading to an increasing shortage of care workers in most countries, and the demographic challenge is only just beginning in most societies. While robots are widely used in industry, robotic support in healthcare is still limited to very specialised robots in the operating theatre. The question of what type of deployment is likely to be successful in a healthcare scenario is not only a technological or economical question, but also one of technology acceptance. &#13;
In this paper we analyse the acceptance of robots in elderly care from the perspective of patients, patient families, and geriatric care professionals. To understand the various positions and to identify the suitability of existing acceptance models, we applied stakeholder mapping to conduct qualitative interviews with 14 people with different knowledge backgrounds and levels of involvement in care situations, based on 9 videos showing different robots and application scenarios. &#13;
The results confirmed that existing technology acceptance models need to be extended by factors such as robot appear-ance. We found that the background knowledge of the respondents influences the results of the questions about e.g. safety concerns. In addition, we found that the contribution to patients' self-determination and independence is an im-portant factor that is not included in existing technology acceptance models. Finally, the discovery of a significant dis-crepancy between the self-perception and the external perception of the different stakeholders regarding the acceptance of a service robot can be explained by the stakeholder positions involved caring for the benefit of a specific patient.&#13;
These findings encourage further research, especially with the underlying assumption that technology acceptance in healthcare is not just a patient issue, but a stakeholder issue. Stake holder mapping is a valid tool to analyze the inter-dependences for acceptance of robots. Therefore, we suggest using a tool such as stakeholder mapping to further ana-lyze these issues.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">18th Academy of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Knowledge (ACIEK) Conference</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-84-09-51414-4</identifier>
    <enrichment key="PeerReviewed">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_Correlation">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Felix Hoepfl</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>technology acceptance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>stakeholder mapping</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>geriatrics</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Angewandte Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Rosenheim</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2294</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>11</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>11</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>9</issue>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>MDPI</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Basel, Schweiz</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Acceptance of AI in SemiStructured Decision-Making Situations Applying the Four-Sides Model of Communication—An Empirical Analysis Focused on Higher Education</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study investigates the impact of generative AI systems like ChatGPT on semi-structured decision-making, specifically in evaluating undergraduate dissertations. We propose using Davis’ technology acceptance model (TAM) and Schulz von Thun’s four-sides communication model to understand human–AI interaction and necessary adaptations for acceptance in dissertation grading. Utilizing an inductive research design, we conducted ten interviews with respondents having varying levels of AI and management expertise, employing four escalating-consequence scenarios mirroring higher education dissertation grading. In all scenarios, the AI functioned as a sender, based on the four-sides model. Findings reveal that technology acceptance for human–AI interaction is adaptive but requires modifications, particularly regarding AI’s transparency. Testing the four-sides model showed support for three sides, with the appeal side receiving negative feedback for AI acceptance as a sender. Respondents struggled to accept the idea of AI, suggesting a grading decision through an appeal. Consequently, transparency about AI’s role emerged as vital. When AI supports instructors transparently, acceptance levels are higher. These results encourage further research on AI as a receiver and the impartiality of AI decision-making without instructor influence. This study emphasizes communication modes in learning-ecosystems, especially in semi-structured decision-making situations with AI as a sender, while highlighting the potential to enhance AI-based decision-making acceptance.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Education Sciences</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.3390/educsci13090865</identifier>
    <enrichment key="RS_Correlation">Nein</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Christian Greiner</author>
    <author>Thomas Peisl</author>
    <author>Felix Höpfl</author>
    <author>Olivia Beese</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>AI as a sender</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>higher education</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>semi-structured decisions</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>four-sides model; technology acceptance model</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="37">Bildung und Erziehung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Angewandte Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Rosenheim</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2289</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>100045</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>10</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>2</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Exploring stakeholder perspectives: Enhancing robot acceptance for sustainable healthcare solutions</title>
    <abstract language="deu">The pandemic has highlighted the fact that healthcare systems around the world are under pressure. Demographic change is leading to an increasing shortage of care workers in most countries, and the demographic challenge is only just beginning in most societies. While robots are widely used in industry, robotic support in healthcare is still limited to very specialized robots in the operating theatre. The question of what type of deployment is likely to be successful in a healthcare scenario is not only a technological or economical question but also one of technology acceptance. The answer to this question supports entrepreneurial opportunities to develop sustainable healthcare solutions.&#13;
In this paper, we analyze the acceptance of robots in elderly care from the perspective of patients, patient families, and geriatric care professionals. To understand the various positions and to identify the suitability of existing acceptance models, we applied stakeholder mapping to conduct qualitative interviews with 14 people with different knowledge backgrounds and levels of involvement in care situations, based on 9 videos showing different robots and application scenarios.&#13;
The results confirmed that existing technology acceptance models need to be extended by factors such as robot appearance. We found that the background knowledge of the respondents influences the results of the questions about e.g. safety concerns. In addition, we found that the contribution to patients' self-determination and independence is an important factor that is not included in existing technology acceptance models. Finally, the discovery of a significant discrepancy between the self-perception and the external perception of the different stakeholders regarding the acceptance of a service robot can be explained by the stakeholder positions involved in caring for the benefit of a specific patient.&#13;
These findings encourage further research, especially with the underlying assumption that technology acceptance in healthcare is not just a patient issue, but a stakeholder issue. Stakeholder mapping is a valid tool to analyze the interdependencies for the acceptance of robots. Therefore, we suggest using a tool such as stakeholder mapping to further analyze these issues.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.stae.2023.100045</identifier>
    <enrichment key="RS_Correlation">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <author>Felix Höpfl</author>
    <author>Thomas Peisl</author>
    <author>Christian Greiner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Technology acceptance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Robot acceptance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Stakeholder mapping</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Geriatrics</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="05">Zeitschriften, fortlaufende Sammelwerke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Angewandte Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Rosenheim</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2165</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>22</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Challenges and care strategies associated with the admission to nursing homes in Germany: a scoping review</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Background&#13;
The admission to a nursing home is a critical life-event for affected persons as well as their families. Admission related processes are lacking adequate participation of older people and their families. To improve transitions to nursing homes, context- and country-specific knowledge about the current practice is needed. Hence, our aim was to summarize available evidence on challenges and care strategies associated with the admission to nursing homes in Germany.&#13;
&#13;
Methods&#13;
We conducted a scoping review and searched eight major international and German-specific electronic databases for journal articles and grey literature published in German or English language since 1995. Further inclusion criteria were focus on challenges or care strategies in the context of nursing home admissions of older persons and comprehensive and replicable information on methods and results. Posters, only-abstract publications and articles dealing with mixed populations including younger adults were excluded. Challenges and care strategies were identified and analysed by structured content analysis using the TRANSCIT model.&#13;
&#13;
Results&#13;
Twelve studies of 1,384 records were finally included. Among those, seven were qualitative studies, three quantitative observational studies and two mixed methods studies. As major challenges neglected participation of older people, psychosocial burden among family caregivers, inadequate professional cooperation and a lack of shared decision-making and evidence-based practice were identified. Identified care strategies included strengthening shared decision-making and evidence-based practice, improvement in professional cooperation, introduction of specialized transitional care staff and enabling participation for older people.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusion&#13;
Although the process of nursing home admission is considered challenging and tends to neglect the needs of older people, little research is available for the German health care system. The perspective of the older people seems to be underrepresented, as most of the studies focused on caregivers and health professionals. Reported care strategies addressed important challenges, however, these were not developed and evaluated in a comprehensive and systematic way. Future research is needed to examine perspectives of all the involved groups to gain a comprehensive picture of the needs and challenges. Interventions based on existing care strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated to provide the basis of adequate support for older persons and their informal caregivers.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">BMC Nursing</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1186/s12912-022-01139-y</identifier>
    <enrichment key="PeerReviewed">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_Acronym">Participate</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_Correlation">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_ProjectTitle">Participate</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="RS_FundingAgency">STMWK</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <author>Stefanie Skudlik</author>
    <author>Julian Hirt</author>
    <author>Tobias Döringer</author>
    <author>Regina Thalhammer</author>
    <author>Katharina Lüftl</author>
    <author>Birgit Prodinger</author>
    <author>Martin Müller</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>transition to nursing home</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Angewandte Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Rosenheim</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2029</id>
    <completedYear>2023</completedYear>
    <publishedYear/>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>88</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>96</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>42</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Relationship between kinematic gait quality and caregiver-reported everyday mobility in children and youth with spastic Cerebral Palsy</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background:&#13;
3D gait analysis (3DGA) is a common assessment in Cerebral Palsy (CP) to quantify the extent of movement abnormalities. Yet, 3DGA is performed in laboratories and may thus be of debatable significance to everyday life.&#13;
&#13;
Aim&#13;
The aim was to assess the relationship between kinematic gait abnormality and everyday mobility in ambulatory children and youth with spastic CP.&#13;
&#13;
Methods:&#13;
73 paediatric and juvenile patients with uni- or bilateral spastic CP (N = 21 USCP, N = 52, BSCP, age: 4–20 y, GMFCS I-III) underwent a 3DGA, while the MobQues47 Questionnaire quantified caregiver-reported mobility. We calculated the Gait Profile Score (GPS), a metric that summarizes how far the lower limb joint angles during walking deviate from those of matched controls.&#13;
&#13;
Results:&#13;
The GPS correlated well with indoor and outdoor mobility (rho = −0.69 and −0.70, both p &lt; 0.001) and the relationships were not significantly different for USCP and BSCP. Still, mobility was lower in BSCP (p &lt; 0.001) and more compromised outdoors (p = 0.002). Indoor mobility could be predicted by walking speed, GPS and age (adj. R2 = 0.62). Outdoor mobility was best predicted by walking speed and GPS (adj. R2 = 0.60). The additive explained variance by the GPS was even higher outdoors than indoors (17.1% vs. 11.4%).&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions:&#13;
Measuring movement deviations with 3DGA seems equally meaningful in uni- and bilaterally affected children and has considerable relevance for real-life ambulation, particurlarly outdoors, where children with spastic CP typically face greater difficulties. Therapeutic strategies that achieve faster walking and reduction of kinematic deviations may increase outdoor mobility.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">European Journal of Paediatric Neurology</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.11.009</identifier>
    <enrichment key="RS_Correlation">Ja</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Matthias Hösl</author>
    <author>Alexander Schupfinger</author>
    <author>Luisa Klich</author>
    <author>Linda Geest</author>
    <author>Petra Bauer</author>
    <author>Michaela V. Bonfert</author>
    <author>Faik K. Afifi</author>
    <author>Sean Nader</author>
    <author>Steffen Berweck</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Cerebral palsy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Mobility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gait analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gait profile score</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Fakultät für Angewandte Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Technische Hochschule Rosenheim</thesisPublisher>
  </doc>
</export-example>
