@book{OPUS4-2166, title = {Interprofessionelles Lernen im Gesundheitswesen: Unterricht entwickeln und gestalten}, editor = {Kerres, Andrea and Wissing, Christiane and L{\"u}ftl, Katharina}, publisher = {Kohlhammer}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-17-039684-5}, publisher = {Technische Hochschule Rosenheim}, pages = {304}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Die Patientenversorgung ist eine interprofessionelle Aufgabe. Deshalb wird die F{\"o}rderung interprofessioneller Kompetenzen zunehmend in den Ausbildungs- und Studiencurricula aller Gesundheitsberufe verankert, sodass Lehrende vor der Herausforderung stehen, Lernangebote zu konzipieren, die Kompetenzen interprofessioneller Kooperation f{\"o}rdern. Der Herausgeberband enth{\"a}lt vielf{\"a}ltige Beispiele f{\"u}r die Durchf{\"u}hrung von Lerneinheiten, die Lernende auf typische interprofessionelle Handlungssituationen oder das interprofessionelle Handeln in unterschiedlichen Versorgungssettings vorbereiten. Auch Best-Practice-Beispiele der interprofessionellen praktischen Ausbildung werden vorgestellt. Zus{\"a}tzlich k{\"o}nnen Online-Materialien f{\"u}r die eigene Lehre heruntergeladen und genutzt werden. Damit bietet das Werk Lehrenden eine Unterst{\"u}tzung, um interprofessionell orientierte Lerneinheiten praxisorientiert zu entwickeln.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Hoepfl2023, author = {Hoepfl, Felix}, title = {Service Robots as Co-workers in Elderly Care: Exploratory Re-search on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare}, series = {18th Academy of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Knowledge (ACIEK) Conference}, booktitle = {18th Academy of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Knowledge (ACIEK) Conference}, publisher = {ACIEK Conference}, isbn = {978-84-09-51414-4}, pages = {1 -- 3}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The pandemic has highlighted the fact that healthcare systems around the world are under pressure. Demographic change is leading to an increasing shortage of care workers in most countries, and the demographic challenge is only just beginning in most societies. While robots are widely used in industry, robotic support in healthcare is still limited to very specialised robots in the operating theatre. The question of what type of deployment is likely to be successful in a healthcare scenario is not only a technological or economical question, but also one of technology acceptance. In this paper we analyse the acceptance of robots in elderly care from the perspective of patients, patient families, and geriatric care professionals. To understand the various positions and to identify the suitability of existing acceptance models, we applied stakeholder mapping to conduct qualitative interviews with 14 people with different knowledge backgrounds and levels of involvement in care situations, based on 9 videos showing different robots and application scenarios. The results confirmed that existing technology acceptance models need to be extended by factors such as robot appear-ance. We found that the background knowledge of the respondents influences the results of the questions about e.g. safety concerns. In addition, we found that the contribution to patients' self-determination and independence is an im-portant factor that is not included in existing technology acceptance models. Finally, the discovery of a significant dis-crepancy between the self-perception and the external perception of the different stakeholders regarding the acceptance of a service robot can be explained by the stakeholder positions involved caring for the benefit of a specific patient. These findings encourage further research, especially with the underlying assumption that technology acceptance in healthcare is not just a patient issue, but a stakeholder issue. Stake holder mapping is a valid tool to analyze the inter-dependences for acceptance of robots. Therefore, we suggest using a tool such as stakeholder mapping to further ana-lyze these issues.}, language = {en} } @article{ClasseLenzOttetal.2023, author = {Classe, Franz and Lenz, Thorsten and Ott, Robert and Boos, Franz-Xaver and Reimer, Maike}, title = {Duales Studium in Bayern: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Praxispartnern}, series = {Social Science Open Access Repository}, journal = {Social Science Open Access Repository}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-88110-1}, pages = {34}, year = {2023}, language = {de} } @article{HoepflPeislGreiner2023, author = {H{\"o}pfl, Felix and Peisl, Thomas and Greiner, Christian}, title = {Exploring stakeholder perspectives: Enhancing robot acceptance for sustainable healthcare solutions}, series = {Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship}, volume = {2}, journal = {Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1016/j.stae.2023.100045}, pages = {100045}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The pandemic has highlighted the fact that healthcare systems around the world are under pressure. Demographic change is leading to an increasing shortage of care workers in most countries, and the demographic challenge is only just beginning in most societies. While robots are widely used in industry, robotic support in healthcare is still limited to very specialized robots in the operating theatre. The question of what type of deployment is likely to be successful in a healthcare scenario is not only a technological or economical question but also one of technology acceptance. The answer to this question supports entrepreneurial opportunities to develop sustainable healthcare solutions. In this paper, we analyze the acceptance of robots in elderly care from the perspective of patients, patient families, and geriatric care professionals. To understand the various positions and to identify the suitability of existing acceptance models, we applied stakeholder mapping to conduct qualitative interviews with 14 people with different knowledge backgrounds and levels of involvement in care situations, based on 9 videos showing different robots and application scenarios. The results confirmed that existing technology acceptance models need to be extended by factors such as robot appearance. We found that the background knowledge of the respondents influences the results of the questions about e.g. safety concerns. In addition, we found that the contribution to patients' self-determination and independence is an important factor that is not included in existing technology acceptance models. Finally, the discovery of a significant discrepancy between the self-perception and the external perception of the different stakeholders regarding the acceptance of a service robot can be explained by the stakeholder positions involved in caring for the benefit of a specific patient. These findings encourage further research, especially with the underlying assumption that technology acceptance in healthcare is not just a patient issue, but a stakeholder issue. Stakeholder mapping is a valid tool to analyze the interdependencies for the acceptance of robots. Therefore, we suggest using a tool such as stakeholder mapping to further analyze these issues.}, language = {en} } @article{GreinerPeislHoepfletal.2023, author = {Greiner, Christian and Peisl, Thomas and H{\"o}pfl, Felix and Beese, Olivia}, title = {Acceptance of AI in SemiStructured Decision-Making Situations Applying the Four-Sides Model of Communication—An Empirical Analysis Focused on Higher Education}, series = {Education Sciences}, volume = {13}, journal = {Education Sciences}, number = {9}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel, Schweiz}, doi = {10.3390/educsci13090865}, pages = {1 -- 11}, year = {2023}, abstract = {This study investigates the impact of generative AI systems like ChatGPT on semi-structured decision-making, specifically in evaluating undergraduate dissertations. We propose using Davis' technology acceptance model (TAM) and Schulz von Thun's four-sides communication model to understand human-AI interaction and necessary adaptations for acceptance in dissertation grading. Utilizing an inductive research design, we conducted ten interviews with respondents having varying levels of AI and management expertise, employing four escalating-consequence scenarios mirroring higher education dissertation grading. In all scenarios, the AI functioned as a sender, based on the four-sides model. Findings reveal that technology acceptance for human-AI interaction is adaptive but requires modifications, particularly regarding AI's transparency. Testing the four-sides model showed support for three sides, with the appeal side receiving negative feedback for AI acceptance as a sender. Respondents struggled to accept the idea of AI, suggesting a grading decision through an appeal. Consequently, transparency about AI's role emerged as vital. When AI supports instructors transparently, acceptance levels are higher. These results encourage further research on AI as a receiver and the impartiality of AI decision-making without instructor influence. This study emphasizes communication modes in learning-ecosystems, especially in semi-structured decision-making situations with AI as a sender, while highlighting the potential to enhance AI-based decision-making acceptance.}, language = {en} } @incollection{LueftlKardasKerresetal.2024, author = {L{\"u}ftl, Katharina and Kardas, Leopold and Kerres, Andrea and Wissing, Christiane}, title = {Anleitungsmethodik f{\"u}r die praktische Pflegeausbildung. Ist-Stand und Bedarfe f{\"u}r eine pflegedidaktische Fundierung}, series = {Handbuch Pflegedidaktik I}, booktitle = {Handbuch Pflegedidaktik I}, editor = {Br{\"u}he, Roland and von Gahlen-Hoops, Wolfgang}, publisher = {UTB}, address = {Stuttgart}, publisher = {Technische Hochschule Rosenheim}, pages = {39 -- 59}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Dieser Beitrag konzentriert sich auf Methoden der Praxisanleitung. Da im deutschsprachigen Raum eine Tendenz zur Methodeneinseitigkeit bzw. zur schwerpunktm{\"a}ßigen Anwendung der Instruktion anzutreffen ist, wird zun{\"a}chst pflegedidaktisch der Bedarf nach einem Methodenmix sowie der Bedarf nach Methoden zur F{\"o}rderung selbst{\"a}ndigen Probleml{\"o}sens begr{\"u}ndet. Dann wird der Frage nachgegangen, welche Methoden f{\"u}r die Praxisanleitung im deutschsprachigen Raum und international in der Literatur beschrieben werden. Diese werden jeweils in einem Mehrebenenmodell der Methodik systematisiert und verglichen. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden pflegedidaktische Forschungsdesiderate und weitere Empfehlungen formuliert, um die Praxisanleitung im deutschsprachigen Raum methodisch weiterzuentwickeln und dadurch Lernende bestm{\"o}glich f{\"u}r die professionelle Bew{\"a}ltigung der Anforderungen pflegerischer Praxis vorzubereiten.}, language = {de} } @incollection{WissingKerresDorotheaetal.2024, author = {Wissing, Christiane and Kerres, Andrea and Dorothea, Thurner and L{\"u}ftl, Katharina}, title = {Pflegedidaktische {\"U}berlegungen zur Implementierung von Fallbesprechungen im Rahmen der Lernortkooperation im Pflegebildungssystem}, series = {Handbuch Pflegedidaktik II}, booktitle = {Handbuch Pflegedidaktik II}, editor = {Br{\"u}he, Roland and von Gahlen-Hoops, Wolfgang}, publisher = {UTB}, address = {Stuttgart}, publisher = {Technische Hochschule Rosenheim}, pages = {93 -- 117}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Eine Lernortkooperation (LOK) kann die Lehr-Lern-Prozesse in der Pflegebildung verbessern (vgl. Briese 2018: 7). Allerdings besteht eine LOK nicht nur aus dem theoretischen und den praktischen Lernorten, sondern auch aus {\"u}bergreifenden Lernorten, wie beispielsweise der sogenannte dritte Lernort. Um die LOK zu st{\"a}rken und ein gemeinsames Bildungsver-st{\"a}ndnis zu erlangen, m{\"o}chten wir die Methode der Fallbesprechung nutzen. Anhand dieser Methode stellen wir pflegedidaktische {\"U}berlegungen an, wie eine zielgruppengerechte Umsetzung auf allen Ebenen der LOK - Information, Abstimmung und Kooperation (vgl. Dehnbostel 2022: 97) - gelingen k{\"o}nnte.}, language = {de} } @misc{ThalhammerLueftl2024, author = {Thalhammer, Regina and L{\"u}ftl, Katharina}, title = {„Da wird bis zur letzten Sekunde gewartet". Das Erleben von {\"U}bergangsprozessen im Kontext von Pflegebed{\"u}rftigkeit aus der Perspektive der Gesundheitsberufe. Eine Grounded Theory Studie. Poster f{\"u}r den EbM Kongress in Berlin am 13.M{\"a}rz 2024}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @misc{KardasLueftl2024, author = {Kardas, Leopold and L{\"u}ftl, Katharina}, title = {DaheimLeben4.0. Technisch unterst{\"u}tztes Leben zuhause - Lernangebot f{\"u}r die generalistische Pflegeausbildung. Workshop beim Bremer Pflegekongress am 16.5.2024}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @article{KardasNickLueftl2023, author = {Kardas, Leopold and Nick, Carola and L{\"u}ftl, Katharina}, title = {Pflegeberufliche Handlungskompetenz in der Anwendung technischer Assistenzsysteme. Ein Scoping Review}, series = {P{\"a}dagogik der Gesundheitsberufe}, volume = {9}, journal = {P{\"a}dagogik der Gesundheitsberufe}, number = {4}, pages = {171 -- 182}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Die Gesundheitswirtschaft ist im hohen Maße von Technisierung und Digitalisierung betroffen, welche neue Kompetenzen bei den verantwortlichen Akteur:innen erfordert. Die F{\"a}higkeiten, die f{\"u}r den professionellen Umgang mit diesen Entwicklungspro zessen relevant sind, werden in der Literatur mit verschiedenen Begriffen umschrieben: Inhalte wie Technik, Digitalit{\"a}t, Medien, Informatik, Computer oder Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) werden mit F{\"a}higkeiten und Fertigkeiten re pr{\"a}sentierenden Begriffen wie Kompetenzen, Literacy oder Skills verkn{\"u}pft. Deutlich wird bisher jedoch nicht, welche spezifi schen F{\"a}higkeiten die im Diskurs geforderten Konstrukte jeweils adressieren, worin sie sich unterscheiden und welchen Beitrag sie zum Ziel beruflicher Handlungskompetenz leisten.}, language = {de} }