@inproceedings{NoethMaierHaderleinetal.2007, author = {N{\"o}th, Elmar and Maier, Andreas and Haderlein, Tino and Riedhammer, Korbinian and Rosanowski, Frank and Schuster, Maria}, title = {Automatic Evaluation of Pathologic Speech - from Research to Routine Clinical Use}, series = {TSD 2007, 10th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue, Pilsen, Czech Republic, September 2007.}, booktitle = {TSD 2007, 10th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue, Pilsen, Czech Republic, September 2007.}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, pages = {294 -- 301}, year = {2007}, abstract = {Previously we have shown that ASR technology can be used to objectively evaluate pathologic speech. Here we report on progress for routine clinical use: 1) We introduce an easy-to-use recording and evaluation environment. 2) We confirm our previous results for a larger group of patients. 3) We show that telephone speech can be analyzed with the same methods with only a small loss of agreement with human experts. 4) We show that prosodic information leads to more robust results. 5) We show that text reference instead of transliteration can be used for evaluation. Using word accuracy of a speech recognizer and prosodic features as features for SVM regression, we achieve a correlation of .90 between the automatic analysis and human experts.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RiedhammerHaderleinSchusteretal.2006, author = {Riedhammer, Korbinian and Haderlein, Tino and Schuster, Maria and Rosanowski, Frank and N{\"o}th, Elmar}, title = {Automatic Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Telephone Speech}, series = {First International Language Technologies Conference (IS-LTC 2006), Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 2006.}, booktitle = {First International Language Technologies Conference (IS-LTC 2006), Ljubljana, Slovenia, October 2006.}, pages = {17 -- 22}, year = {2006}, abstract = {The tracheoesophageal (TE) substitute voice is currently state-of-the-art treatment to restore the ability to speak after laryngectomy. The intelligibility while talking over a telephone is an important clinical factor, as it is a crucial part of the patients' social life. An objective way to rate the intelligibility of substitute voices when talking over a telephone is desirable to improve the post-laryngectomy speech therapy. An automatic speech recognition (ASR) system was applied to 41 high quality recordings of post-laryngectomy patients. The ASR system was trained with normal, non-pathologic speech. It yielded a word accuracy (WA) of 36.9\%±18.0\%; compared to the intelligibility rating of a group of human experts the ASR system had a correlation coefficient of -.88. After downsampling the 41 recordings to telephone quality, the ASR system reached a WA of 26.4\%±13.9\% leading to a correlation coefficient of -.80. These results confirm that an ASR system can be used for objective intelligibility rating over the telephone.}, language = {en} } @article{HaderleinRiedhammerNoethetal.2008, author = {Haderlein, Tino and Riedhammer, Korbinian and N{\"o}th, Elmar and Toy, Hikmet and Schuster, Maria and Eysholdt, Ulrich and Hornegger, Joachim and Rosanowski, Frank}, title = {Application of Automatic Speech Recognition to Quantitative Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Speech in Different Signal Quality}, series = {Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica}, volume = {2008}, journal = {Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica}, number = {61(1)}, pages = {12 -- 17}, year = {2008}, abstract = {Tracheoesophageal voice is state-of-the-art in voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Intelligibility on a telephone is an important evaluation criterion as it is a crucial part of social life. An objective measure of intelligibility when talking on a telephone is desirable in the field of postlaryngectomy speech therapy and its evaluation. Based upon successful earlier studies with broadband speech, an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system was applied to 41 recordings of postlaryngectomy patients. Recordings were available in different signal qualities; quality was the crucial criterion for this study. Compared to the intelligibility rating of 5 human experts, the ASR system had a correlation coefficient of r = -0.87 and Krippendorff's alpha of 0.65 when broadband speech was processed. The rater group alone achieved alpha = 0.66. With the test recordings in telephone quality, the system reached r = -0.79 and alpha = 0.67. For medical purposes, a comprehensive diagnostic approach to (substitute) voice has to cover both subjective and objective tests. An automatic recognition system such as the one proposed in this study can be used for objective intelligibility rating with results comparable to those of human experts. This holds for broadband speech as well as for automatic evaluation via telephone.}, language = {en} }