@article{BaeumlAslan2006, author = {B{\"a}uml, Karl-Heinz and Aslan, Alp}, title = {Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: The role of encoding}, series = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition}, volume = {32}, journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition}, number = {1}, pages = {33 -- 43}, year = {2006}, abstract = {The presentation of a subset of learned items as retrieval cues can have detrimental effects on recall of the remaining items. For 2 types of encoding conditions, the authors examined in 3 experiments whether such part-list cuing is a transient or a lasting phenomenon. Across the experiments, the detrimental effect of part-list cues was consistently found to be transient with a high degree of interitem associations and lasting with a low degree. These results indicate that the persistence of part-list cuing depends on encoding, thus challenging both strategy disruption and retrieval inhibition as general accounts of part-list cuing. A 2-mechanism account is provided according to which the 2 mechanisms mediate the effect in different encoding conditions.}, language = {en} } @article{BaeumlAslan2004, author = {B{\"a}uml, Karl-Heinz and Aslan, Alp}, title = {Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition}, series = {Memory \& Cognition}, volume = {32}, journal = {Memory \& Cognition}, number = {4}, pages = {610 -- 617}, year = {2004}, abstract = {The reexposure of a subset of learned material as a retrieval cue can impair recall of the remaining material. Like part-list relearning—the reexposure of learned material for additional learning—this part-list cuing is often assumed to be the result of output order biases at test, caused by the increased strength of the reexposed material. We directly compared the effects of cuing and relearning when controlling for output order biases. In addition, we compared the two forms of reexposure with the effect of part-list retrieval. Both part-list cuing and part-list retrieval reduced recall performance for the remaining material. By contrast, part-list relearning had no such detrimental effect. These results indicate that the effect of reexposure depends on whether material is reexposed as a cue or for relearning, suggesting that part-list cuing reflects an instructional effect. Evidence is provided that part-list cuing leads to instructed covert retrieval of cue items and causes retrieval inhibition of noncue items, similar to how overt retrieval inhibits nonretrieved items.}, language = {en} }