@article{KubikKoslowskiSchubertetal.2022, author = {Kubik, Veit and Koslowski, Kenneth and Schubert, Torsten and Aslan, Alp}, title = {Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval}, series = {Metacognition and Learning}, journal = {Metacognition and Learning}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Interim tests of previously studied information can potentiate subsequent learning of new information, in part, because retrieval-based processes help to reduce proactive interference from previously learned information. We hypothesized that an effect similar to this forward testing effect would also occur when making judgments of (prior) learning (JOLs). Previous research showed that making JOLs likely prompts covert retrieval attempts and thereby enhances memory, specifically when providing only parts of previously studied information. This study examined the forward effect of different types of JOLs (i.e., with complete or partial prior study information available) on subsequent learning of new materials, compared to restudy and retrieval practice. In a between-subjects design, participants (N = 161) consecutively studied five lists of 20 words with the aim to recall as many of them on a final cumulative recall test. After the presentation of each of the first four lists, participants either restudied the list, made JOLs with complete words, made JOLs with word stems, or they were tested on word stems. Compared to restudy, practicing retrieval and making JOLs with word stems, but not JOLs with complete words, facilitated the List-5 interim recall performance and attenuated the number of intrusions from prior lists. The findings suggest that, similar to overt retrieval, making JOLs with incomplete information can enhance new learning to the extent that it elicits covert retrieval attempts.}, language = {en} } @incollection{AslanNeumann2021, author = {Aslan, Alp and Neumann, Joachim}, title = {Testbasiertes Lernen in der medizinisch-pharmakologischen Lehre}, series = {Multimediales Lehren und Lernen an der Martin-Luther-Universit{\"a}t Halle-Wittenberg. Befunde und Ans{\"a}tze aus dem Forschungsf{\"o}rderprogramm des Zentrums f{\"u}r multimediales Lehren und Lernen (LLZ)}, booktitle = {Multimediales Lehren und Lernen an der Martin-Luther-Universit{\"a}t Halle-Wittenberg. Befunde und Ans{\"a}tze aus dem Forschungsf{\"o}rderprogramm des Zentrums f{\"u}r multimediales Lehren und Lernen (LLZ)}, publisher = {Zentrum f{\"u}r multimediales Lehren und Lernen (LLZ), Martin-Luther-Universit{\"a}t Halle-Wittenberg}, address = {Halle (Saale)}, publisher = {Technische Hochschule Rosenheim}, pages = {118 -- 128}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Ziel des hier vorgestellten Projekts war es, den sogenannten forward testing effect (FTE) - den positiven Effekt des Testens zuvor gelernter Informationen auf das Lernen und Behalten nachfolgender Informationen - in einem anwendungsorientierten Setting zu untersuchen. Dazu lernten Medizinstudierende im Rahmen eines Seminars zur Pharmakologie zun{\"a}chst zwei Listen mit pharmakologischen Aussagen (z. B. „Clozapin kann eine Agranulozytose bedingen"). Nach dem Lernen einer jeden Liste wurde die Liste entweder noch einmal zum Lernen pr{\"a}sentiert (Lernbedingung) oder die Liste wurde getestet (Testbedingung; z. B. „Clozapin kann eine ________ bedingen"). Anschließend wurde in beiden Bedingungen eine dritte (kritische) Liste gelernt und nach 1 min bzw. 7 Tagen getestet. Konsistent mit fr{\"u}heren Befunden zum FTE war die Behaltensleistung f{\"u}r die (kritische) Liste 3 in der Testbedingung signifikant h{\"o}her als in der Lernbedingung. Dies galt unabh{\"a}ngig von der L{\"a}nge des Behaltensintervalls. Die Ergebnisse deuten an, dass Tests den (sonst {\"u}blichen) Aufbau von proaktiver Interferenz reduzieren und dadurch das nachfolgende Lernen und Behalten von neuen Informationen beg{\"u}nstigen k{\"o}nnen. Der Befund, dass der FTE nicht auf artifizielle Laborsituationen beschr{\"a}nkt ist, sondern sich auch mit p{\"a}dagogisch relevanten Lerninhalten und nach p{\"a}dagogisch relevanten (l{\"a}ngeren) Behaltensintervallen finden l{\"a}sst, hat potentiell bedeutsame Implikationen f{\"u}r die (multimediale) Hochschullehre.}, language = {de} } @article{AslanKubik2024, author = {Aslan, Alp and Kubik, Veit}, title = {Buildup and Release from Proactive Interference: The Forward Testing Effect in Children's Spatial Memory}, series = {Journal of Experimental Child Psychology}, volume = {240}, journal = {Journal of Experimental Child Psychology}, publisher = {Elsevier}, doi = {10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105838}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Previous work has indicated that testing can enhance memory for subsequently studied new information by reducing proactive interference from previously studied information. Here, we examined this forward testing effect in children's spatial memory. Kindergartners (5-6 years) and younger (7-8 years) and older (9-10 years) elementary school children studied four successively presented 3 x 3 arrays, each composed of the same 9 objects. The children were asked to memorize the locations of the objects that differed across the four arrays. Following presentation of each of the first three arrays, memory for the object locations of the respective array was tested (testing condition) or the array was re-presented for additional study (restudy condition). Results revealed that testing Arrays 1 to 3 enhanced children's object location memory for Array 4 relative to restudying. Moreover, children in the testing condition were less likely to confuse Array 4 locations with previous locations, suggesting that testing reduces the buildup of proactive interference. Both effects were found regardless of age. Thus, the current findings indicate that testing is an effective means to resolve proactive interference and, in this way, to enhance children's learning and remembering of spatial information even before the time of school entry.}, language = {en} }