@article{Schlosser2009, author = {Schloßer, Philipp}, title = {Der gespaltene Krankenhausaufnahmevertrag bei wahl{\"a}rztlichen Leistungen}, series = {Medizinrecht}, journal = {Medizinrecht}, pages = {313}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{Schlosser2009, author = {Schloßer, Philipp}, title = {Gesamtschuldnerausgleich zwischen zwei Krankenh{\"a}usern, Anmerkung zu LG M{\"u}nchen, Urt. 5.3.2008 - 9 O 24390/05}, series = {Medizinrecht}, journal = {Medizinrecht}, pages = {234}, year = {2009}, abstract = {Die Haftungsverteilung im Innenverh{\"a}ltnis zweier an der fehlerhaften Behandlung beteiligten Krankenh{\"a}user erfolgt nicht gem{\"a}ß \S 426 Abs. 1 S. 1 BGB, sondern richtet sich gem{\"a}ß \S 254 BGB nach dem Maß der Verursachung. Maßgeblich ist dabei, mit welchem Grad von Wahrscheinlichkeit die beiderseitigen Verursachungsbeitr{\"a}ge zur Herbeif{\"u}hrung des Schadens jeweils geeignet waren. Die Haftung des einen Ersatzpflichtigen kann dabei so in den Hintergrund treten, dass der andere im Innenverh{\"a}ltnis allein haftet. (Leitsatz des Bearbeiters)}, language = {de} } @incollection{OttRehder2009, author = {Ott, Robert and Rehder, Felix}, title = {Finanzierung und Verg{\"u}tung der integrierten Versorgung aus Sicht eines Krankenhaustr{\"a}gers}, series = {Innovative Versorgungsformen im Gesundheitswesen: Konzepte und Praxisbeispiele erfolgreicher Finanzierung und Verg{\"u}tung}, volume = {2009}, booktitle = {Innovative Versorgungsformen im Gesundheitswesen: Konzepte und Praxisbeispiele erfolgreicher Finanzierung und Verg{\"u}tung}, editor = {Braun, G{\"u}nther and G{\"u}ssow, Jan and Schumann, Andr{\´e} and Heßbr{\"u}gge, Georg}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Deutscher {\"A}rzte-Verlag}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, publisher = {Technische Hochschule Rosenheim}, pages = {99 -- 108}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{FriedlMultererOtt2009, author = {Friedl, Gunther and Multerer, Christian and Ott, Robert}, title = {Den Krankenhaus-Erfolg ermitteln und steuern. Interne Verrechnungspreise sind nicht nur notwendiges {\"U}bel, sondern k{\"o}nnen gewinnbringend eingesetzt werden.}, series = {f\&w f{\"u}hren und wirtschaften im Krankenhaus}, volume = {2009}, journal = {f\&w f{\"u}hren und wirtschaften im Krankenhaus}, number = {3/2009}, publisher = {Bibliomed Medizinische Verlagsgesellschaft mbH}, address = {Melsungen}, pages = {285 -- 288}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @misc{Botzum2009, author = {Botzum, Edeltraud}, title = {Rezension vom 22.12.2009 zu: Edelgard Vacek: Wie man {\"u}ber Wandel spricht. Perspektivische Darstellung und interaktive Bearbeitung von Wandel in Organisationsprozessen.}, series = {socialnet Rezensionen}, journal = {socialnet Rezensionen}, publisher = {VS Verlag f{\"u}r Sozialwissenschaften}, address = {Wiesbaden}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{StammVanderGiesenThorstenssonetal.2009, author = {Stamm, T. and Van der Giesen, F. and Thorstensson, C. and Steen, E. and Birrell, F. and Bauernfeind, B. and Marshall, N. and Prodinger, Birgit and Machold, K. and Smolen, J. and Kloppenburg, M.}, title = {Patient perspective of hand osteoarthritis in relation to concepts covered by instruments measuring functioning: a qualitative European multicentre study}, series = {Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases}, volume = {68}, journal = {Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases}, number = {9}, pages = {1453 -- 1460}, year = {2009}, abstract = {Objective: To explore whether the concepts important to patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA) are covered by the most commonly used instruments measuring functioning. Method: A qualitative multicentre study using a focus group technique was performed in five European countries: Austria, The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The qualitative data analysis followed a modified form of "meaning condensation" and used the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a theoretical framework. Finally, the concepts from the focus groups were compared with the content of the most commonly used instruments which had been identified in an earlier theoretical analysis. Results: Fifty-six people (51 women, mean (SD) age 62.7 (7.9) years) with hand OA participated in this study in two focus groups per centre. 63 concepts were extracted from the focus groups. Twenty-one (33\%) of the 63 concepts were covered by at least one instrument. Psychological consequences, different qualities of pain, aesthetic changes and leisure activities are important concepts from the focus groups which were not covered by the instruments. The qualitative analysis revealed detailed descriptions of pain-concerning sensations, levels and a certain relation to activity, none of which were fully represented in the instruments routinely used. Conclusion: It was possible to combine the concepts of the focus groups from each centre into a common qualitative analysis. The concepts important to people with hand OA are not fully represented in the most commonly used instruments.}, language = {en} } @article{BauernfeindAringerProdingeretal.2009, author = {Bauernfeind, B. and Aringer, M. and Prodinger, Birgit and Kirchberger, I. and Machold, K. and Smolen, J. and Stamm, T.}, title = {Identification of relevant concepts of functioning in daily life in people with systematic Lupus Erythematosus: A patient Delphi exercise}, series = {Arthritis Care \& Research}, volume = {61}, journal = {Arthritis Care \& Research}, number = {1}, pages = {21 -- 28}, year = {2009}, abstract = {Objective To identify the most important and relevant concepts of daily functioning from the perspective of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods We conducted a consensus-building, 3-round, electronic mail survey with SLE patients using the Delphi technique. The Delphi technique is a structured communication process with 4 key characteristics: anonymity, iteration with controlled feedback, statistical group response, and informed input. The concepts contained in the answers of the patients were extracted and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Results Of the total 225 participants, 194 (86.2\%) completed the questionnaires from all 3 Delphi rounds. In total, after the third Delphi round, 307 concepts were identified. Ninety concepts (55 in the domain body functions and structures, 16 in activities and participation, and 19 in environmental factors) were considered relevant by at least 50\% of the participants in the third round and linked to the ICF. Twelve concepts were considered important by at least 75\% of the participants. Conclusion The high number of concepts resulting from this large-scale patient Delphi approach underlines the great variety of SLE patients' problems in daily functioning. The results of this patient Delphi project supplement the findings of our focus-group study in establishing a comprehensive overview of the patient perspective in SLE.}, language = {en} }