@article{MoroneVieiraLangeetal.2026, author = {Morone, Piergiuseppe and Vieira, Helena and Lange, Lene and Meer, Yvonne Van der and Penttil{\"a}, Merja and Dragicevic, Arnaud and Koukios, Emmanuel and Krommes, Sandra and Alvarino Pereira, Teresa and Vincevica-Gaile, Zane and Vidarsson, Jonas and Zorpas, Antonis A. and Zimmermannova, Jarmilla and Zimniewska, Malgorzata and O'Connor, Kevin E.}, title = {The European Bioeconomy strategy revision: an opportunity to go against the tide and secure a sustainable future}, series = {Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy}, volume = {13}, journal = {Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy}, number = {100204}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy}, doi = {10.1016/j.clcb.2026.100204}, pages = {1 -- 9}, year = {2026}, abstract = {In today's tense geopolitical landscape, marked by strained relations among major powers and deep-rooted dependence on fossil-based economies, the emerging modern bioeconomy can provide resource independence and resilience, in tandem with economic, social, and environmental benefits, and thus has the potential to underpin a sustainable future. The bioeconomy is a vital cross-cutting meta-sector, but it is not inherently circular or sustainable; without intentional design, it risks becoming a linear, unsustainable replacement of the fossil-based economy. Realising its full promise requires purposeful engineering to address climate change, biodiversity loss, strengthen resource independence, support food security and resilience, create jobs, promote social inclusion, boost competitiveness and autonomy, and improve human, animal, and environmental health. The potential is enormous, but so are the challenges society faces in realising the vision for a biobased, nature-positive future.}, language = {en} } @article{CarradiniGetchellCardonetal.2023, author = {Carradini, Stephen and Getchell, Kristen and Cardon, Peter and Fleischmann, Carolin and Aritz, Jolanta and Stapp, James}, title = {Evidence-based recommendations for recorded meetings policies}, series = {Business Horizons}, journal = {Business Horizons}, doi = {10.1016/j.bushor.2023.08.003}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Virtual meeting recordings have become a common part of virtual and hybrid workplace environments. Meeting recordings offer potential benefits (speedy transcript production, expedited information sharing, searchable information, inclusion of visual and tonal expressions) and drawbacks (difficulty discussing sensitive issues, employee privacy, limited off-the-record capabilities, and employee concerns over sharing recordings). Given this variance, policies for virtual meetings are a necessity. Managers can successfully implement a policy by co-creating policy preferences with employees in open-ended and nonjudgmental conversations that openly discuss potential benefits, drawbacks, and employee concerns. Topics such as when to record, when not to record, how to gain consent, and who will have administrative and sharing rights should be covered. Accessibility concerns, use or rejection of software features, for how long and where meeting recordings should be stored, and emerging issues such as use of virtual reality meetings and AI tools are areas of less urgency that may be part of the conversations. Managers should deliver policy preferences to a group of representatives from Human Resources, Information Technology, and the executive team to compose the policy, request a legal review, then introduce and implement it in the organization.}, language = {en} }