Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- conference talk (2)
- conference proceeding (article) (1)
Language
- English (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- AnyBody (1)
- Biomechanik (1)
- Haltungsfehler (1)
- Hüftgelenkpfanne (1)
- Hüftgelenkprothese (1)
- Simulation (1)
- component position (1)
- elbow stability (1)
- gait analysis (1)
- kinematics (1)
Institute
Begutachtungsstatus
- peer-reviewed (4)
Elbow stability is derived from a combination of muscular, ligamentous, and bony structures. After an elbow trauma the stability of the joint is an important decision criterion for the subsequent treatment. The decision regarding non-operative/operative care depends mostly on subjective assessments of medical experts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use musculoskeletal simulations as an objective assessment tool to investigate the extent to which failure of different stabilizers affects the elbow stability and how these observations correspond to the assessment from clinical practice. A musculoskeletal elbow simulation model was developed for this aim. To investigate the stability of the elbow, varus/valgus moments were applied under 0°, 45°and 90° flexion while the respective cubital angle was analyzed. This was performed for nine different injury scenarios, which were also evaluated for stability by clinical experts. With the results, it can be determined by which injury pattern and under which flexion angle the elbow stability is impaired regarding varus/valgus moments. The scenario with a complete failure of the medial and lateral ligaments and a fracture of the radial head was identified as having the greatest instability. The study presented a numerical determination of elbow stability against varus/valgus moments regarding clinical injury patterns, as well as a comparison of the numerical outcome with experience gained in clinical practice. The numerical predictions agree well with the assessments of the clinical specialists. Thus, the results from musculoskeletal simulation can make an important contribution to a more objective assessment of the elbow stability.
Static pelvic tilt impacts functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we investigated the effect of kinematic pelvic changes on cup position. In the course of a prospective controlled trial postoperative 3D-computed tomography (CT) and gait analysis before and 6 and 12 months after THA were obtained in 60 patients. Kinematic pelvic motion during gait was measured using Anybody Modeling System. By fusion with 3D-CT, the impact of kinematic pelvic tilt alterations on cup anteversion and inclination was calculated. Furthermore, risk factors correlating with high pelvic mobility were evaluated. During gait a high pelvic range of motion up to 15.6° exceeding 5° in 61.7% (37/60) of patients before THA was found. After surgery, the pelvis tilted posteriorly by a mean of 4.0 ± 6.6° (p < .001). The pelvic anteflexion led to a mean decrease of −1.9 ± 2.2° (p < .001) for cup inclination and −15.1 ± 6.1° (p < .001) for anteversion in relation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Kinematic pelvic changes resulted in a further change up to 2.3° for inclination and up to 12.3° for anteversion. In relation to the preoperative situation differences in postoperative cup position ranged from −4.4 to 4.6° for inclination and from −7.8 to 17.9° for anteversion, respectively. Female sex (p < .001) and normal body weight (p < .001) correlated with high alterations in pelvic tilt. Kinematic pelvic changes highly impact cup anteversion in THA. Surgeons using the APP as reference should aim for a higher anteversion of about 15° due to the functional anteflexion of the pelvis during gait.
Outputs of musculoskeletal models should be considered probabilistic rather than deterministic as they are affected by inaccuracies and estimations associated with the development of the model. One of these uncertainties being critical for modeling arises from the determination of the muscles' line of action and the physiological cross-sectional area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome sensitivity of model predictions from a musculoskeletal hand model in comparison to the uncertainty of these input parameters. For this purpose, the kinematics and muscle activities of different hand movements (abduction of the fingers, abduction of the thumb, and flexion of the thumb) were recorded. One thousand simulations were calculated for each movement using the Latin hypercube sampling method with a corresponding variation of the muscle origin/insertion points and the cross-sectional area. Comparing the standard hand to simulations incorporating uncertainties of input parameters shows no major deviations in on- and off-set time point of muscle activities. About 60% of simulations are located within a ± 30% interval around the standard model concerning joint reaction forces. The comparison with the variation of the input data leads to the conclusion that the standard hand model is able to provide not over-scattered outcomes and, therefore, can be considered relatively stable. These results are of practical importance to the personalization of a musculoskeletal model with subject-specific bone geometries and hence changed muscle line of action.
Ergonomic workplaces lead to fewer work-related musculoskeletal disorders and thus fewer sick days. There are various guidelines to help avoid harmful situations. However, these recommendations are often rather crude and often neglect the complex interaction of biomechanical loading and psychological stress. This study investigates whether machine learning algorithms can be used to predict mechanical and stress-related muscle activity for a standardized motion. For this purpose, experimental data were collected for trunk movement with and without additional psychological stress. Two different algorithms (XGBoost and TensorFlow) were used to model the experimental data. XGBoost in particular predicted the results very well. By combining it with musculoskeletal models, the method shown here can be used for workplace analysis but also for the development of real-time feedback systems in real workplace environments.
Workflow for the development of a non-invasive feedback device to assess pelvic floor contractions
(2024)
Introduction
Pelvic floor disorders affect about 40% of women worldwide [1]. Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training is both a preventive and a therapeutic intervention. Current PFM training devices are invasive and have little scientific evidence. The idea is to develop a noninvasive feedback device to assess adequate PFM contraction. Therefore, evidence-based female musculoskeletal models, non-invasive data acquisition, sensor technology and artificial intelligence (AI) will be combined. This work presents the workflow to achieve such a feedback device and describes the interaction of the technologies used.
Methods
Exercises that induce PFM contractions have been evaluated and defined. Motion capture of these exercises will provide input for female musculoskeletal models. A combination of biomechanical rigid body and FEM simulations will be used to estimate PFM contractions. In addition, a non-invasive sensor will measure pelvic floor activity. The simulated and measured data will be used to develop an AI model that provides feedback on PFM contractions based on non-invasive data collection.
Results
The AMMR (AnyBody Managed Model Repository) of the AnyBody modelling system (AMS, Aalborg, Denmark) serves as the initial model for performing inverse dynamic simulations of the exercises. To calculate the PFM forces, the full-body model must be supplemented with the relevant pelvic floor structures and a mass model of the internal organs. A modified abdominal pressure model must also be incorporated. The AMS calculates the PFM activities caused by the internal organ loads and the generated abdominal pressure during the exercises. The muscle activities are transferred to a FEM model of the female pelvic floor (SfePy, simple finite elements in Python). The identical pelvic floor structures were integrated into the FEM model as in the AMS. Active PFM contractions can be simulated using the FEM model. Movement of the coccyx due to PFM contractions has been reported in the literature [2,3]. Therefore, a noninvasive coccyx motion sensor will be developed to provide additional information on PFM contractions. The measured data (coccyx motion sensor, motion capture) and the simulation results of the models will be combined to create an AI feedback model using Python. The final feedback device will consist of the AI model and the developed coccyx motion sensor, which can reproduce the resulting PFM contractions based on the sensor data and simplified motion tracking.
Discussion
The creation of the AMS and the FEM model is a prerequisite for the development of the feedback device. The relevant structures in the models are located inside the body. This limits the ability to observe the structures during the exercises, which can lead to difficulties in model validation. The development of a user-friendly sensor with sufficient measuring accuracy of the coccyx motion is another challenge. Nevertheless, the workflow represents a promising approach to develop a noninvasive feedback system to assess PFM contraction.
References
1. Wang et al, Front Public Health, 10:975829, 2022.
2. Bø et al, Neurourol Urodyn, 20:167–174, 2001.
3. Fujisaki et al, J Phys Ther Sci, 30:544–548, 2018.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the project no. BYCZ01-014 of the Program INTERREG Bavaria – Czechia 2021–2027.