Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- conference proceeding (article) (13)
- Article (10)
- conference proceeding (presentation, abstract) (7)
- conference talk (2)
- Moving Images (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Preprint (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (35)
Keywords
- AnyBody (2)
- AnyBody Modeling System (2)
- Bewegungsapparat (2)
- Biomechanics (2)
- Biomechanik (2)
- Stress (2)
- Accoucheur (1)
- Arbeitsbedingungen (1)
- Biomechanische Analyse (1)
- Computersimulation (1)
- EMG (1)
- Ellenbogenstabilität (1)
- Football (1)
- Forschung (1)
- Forschungsbericht (1)
- Gait (1)
- Glenohumeral joint reaction force (1)
- Ground Reaction Force Prediction (1)
- IMU (1)
- Inertial Measurement Units (1)
- Joint Reaction Forces (1)
- Kniegelenk (1)
- Körper (1)
- Körperliche Belastung (1)
- Ligament stiffness (1)
- Lumbar spine (1)
- MRI (1)
- Mehrkörpersimulation (1)
- Mensch (1)
- Motion Capture (1)
- Motion Capturing (1)
- Multibody Simulation (1)
- Muscle model (1)
- Muscle trajectory (1)
- Muscoloskeletal model (1)
- Musculoskeletal Modeling (1)
- Musculoskeletal Simulation (1)
- Musculoskeletal analysis (1)
- Musculoskeletal modelling (1)
- Musculoskeletal simulation (1)
- Muskuloskelettale Simulation (1)
- Sagittal balance (1)
- Schultergelenk (1)
- Shoulder joint (1)
- Shoulder joint complex (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Speedcourt (1)
- Spinal fusion (1)
- Spine biomechanics (1)
- Torus (1)
- Vergleichende Anatomie (1)
- Webcast (1)
- Wirbelsäulenversteifung (1)
- Wrapping (1)
- attention (1)
- biomechanics (1)
- crosstalk (1)
- functionality (1)
- influence parameters (1)
- lower back load (1)
- muscle injury (1)
- musculoskeletal modeling (1)
- musculoskeletal simulation (1)
- musculoskeletal system (1)
- optical motion capture (1)
- pelvic floor (1)
- range of motion (1)
- sensors (1)
- surface electromyography (1)
- validation (1)
Institute
Begutachtungsstatus
- peer-reviewed (9)
- begutachtet (1)
Musculoskeletal lower back load of accoucheurs during childbirth – A pilot and feasibility study
(2021)
Introduction: Back problems represent one of the leading causes of accouchers' work-related musculoskeletal morbidities. The correct execution of birth-related maneuvers including manual perineal protection is crucial not only for the mother and child but also for obstetricians and midwives to reduce any strain on their musculoskeletal system. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was to test the feasibility of determining the effect of different accouchers' postures (standing and kneeling) on their musculoskeletal system.
Methods: The biomechanical analysis is based on musculoskeletal simulations that included motion recordings of real deliveries as well as deliveries conducted on a birthing simulator. These simulations were then used to determine individual joints' loads.
Results: In the kneeling posture, both a low intra-operator variability and a lower average maximum load of the lower back was observed. For the standing position the spine load was reduced by pivoting the elbow on the accouchers' thigh, which in turn was associated with a significantly greater load on the shoulder joint.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of our technique to assess joints loads. It also provided initial data indicating that a posture that reduces spinal flexion and tilt, achieved in this study by the kneeling, can significantly reduce the strain on the practitioner's musculoskeletal system.
To avoid dislocation of the shoulder joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, it is important to achieve sufficient shoulder stability when placing the implant components during surgery. One parameter for assessing shoulder stability can be shoulder stiffness. The aim of this research was to develop a temporary reverse shoulder implant prototype that would allow intraoperative measurement of shoulder stiffness while varying the position of the implant components. Joint angle and torque measurement techniques were developed to determine shoulder stiffness. Hall sensors were used to measure the joint angles by converting the magnetic flux densities into angles. The accuracy of the joint angle measurements was tested using a test bench. Torques were determined by using thin-film pressure sensors. Various mechanical mechanisms for variable positioning of the implant components were integrated into the prototype. The results of the joint angle measurements showed measurement errors of less than 5° in a deflection range of ±15° adduction/abduction combined with ±45° flexion/extension. The proposed design provides a first approach for intra-operative assessment of shoulder stiffness. The findings can be used as a technological basis for further developments.
Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact ontheir quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the current state oftechnology used to assess pelvic floor functionality. It also provides literature research of the phys-iological and anatomical factors that correlate with pelvic floor health. The systematic review wasconducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library andIEEE databases were searched for publications on sensor technology for the assessment of pelvicfloor functionality. Anatomical and physiological parameters were identified through a manualsearch. In the systematic review 115 publications were included. 12 different sensor technologieswere identified. Information on the obtained parameters, sensor position, test activities and subjectcharacteristics were prepared in tabular form from each publication. 16 anatomical and physiologi- cal parameters influencing pelvic floor health were identified in 17 published studies and rankedfor their statistical significance. Taken together, this review could serve as a basis for the develop-ment of novel sensors which could allow for quantifiable prevention and diagnosis, as well as par-ticularized documentation of rehabilitation processes related to pelvic floor dysfunctions.
Using markerless motion capture and musculoskeletal models: An evaluation of joint kinematics
(2024)
BACKGROUND: This study presents a comprehensive comparison between a marker-based motion capture system (MMC) and a video-based motion capture system (VMC) in the context of kinematic analysis using musculoskeletal models. OBJECTIVE: Focusing on joint angles, the study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of VMC as a viable alternative for biomechanical research.
METHODS: Eighteen healthy subjects performed isolated movements with 17 joint degrees of freedom, and their kinematic data were collected using both an MMC and a VMC setup. The kinematic data were entered into the AnyBody Modelling System, which enables the calculation of joint angles. The mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated to quantify the deviations between the two systems.
RESULTS: The results showed good agreement between VMC and MMC at several joint angles. In particular, the shoulder, hip and knee joints showed small deviations in kinematics with MAE values of 4.8∘, 6.8∘ and 3.5∘, respectively. However, the study revealed problems in tracking hand and elbow movements, resulting in higher MAE values of 13.7∘ and 27.7∘. Deviations were also higher for head and thoracic movements.
CONCLUSION: Overall, VMC showed promising results for lower body and shoulder kinematics. However, the tracking of the wrist and pelvis still needs to be refined. The research results provide a basis for further investigations that promote the fusion of VMC and musculoskeletal models.
Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the current state of technology used to assess pelvic floor functionality. It also provides literature research of the physiological and anatomical factors that correlate with pelvic floor health. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and IEEE databases were searched for publications on sensor technology for the assessment of pelvic floor functionality. Anatomical and physiological parameters were identified through a manual search. In the systematic review, 114 publications were included. Twelve different sensor technologies were identified. Information on the obtained parameters, sensor position, test activities, and subject characteristics was prepared in tabular form from each publication. A total of 16 anatomical and physiological parameters influencing pelvic floor health were identified in 17 published studies and ranked for their statistical significance. Taken together, this review could serve as a basis for the development of novel sensors which could allow for quantifiable prevention and diagnosis, as well as particularized documentation of rehabilitation processes related to pelvic floor dysfunctions.