Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- conference proceeding (article) (68)
- Article (55)
- conference proceeding (presentation, abstract) (18)
- conference talk (8)
- Part of Periodical (5)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Moving Images (1)
- Preprint (1)
- Report (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (159) (remove)
Keywords
- Biomechanik (12)
- Biomechanics (9)
- Simulation (9)
- Biomechanische Analyse (7)
- Hüftgelenkprothese (7)
- AnyBody (4)
- Bewegungsapparat (4)
- Spongiosa (4)
- biomechanics (4)
- Inverse dynamics (3)
Institute
- Fakultät Maschinenbau (154)
- Labor Biomechanik (LBM) (153)
- Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE (133)
- Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST (21)
- Hochschulleitung/Hochschulverwaltung (5)
- Institut für Angewandte Forschung und Wirtschaftskooperationen (IAFW) (4)
- Labor Werkstoffprüfung und Metallographie (4)
- Labor Faserverbundtechnik (LFT) (3)
- Labor Biofluidmechanik (2)
- Technologie-Campus Neustadt an der Donau (2)
Begutachtungsstatus
- peer-reviewed (46)
- begutachtet (5)
BACKGROUND:
Validation and verification of multibody musculoskeletal models sEMG is a difficult process because of the reliability of sEMG data and the complex relationship of muscle force and sEMG.
OBJECTIVE:
This work aims at comparing experimentally recorded and simulated muscle activities considering a numerical model for crosstalk. METHODS:
For providing an experimentally derived reference data set, subjects were performing elevations of the arm, where the activities of the contemplated muscle groups were measured by sEMG sensors. Computed muscle activities were further processed and transformed into an artificial electromyographical signal, which includes a numerical crosstalk model. In order to determine whether the crosstalk model provides a better agreement with the measured muscle activities, the Pearson correlation coefficient has been computed as a qualitative way of assessing the curve progression of the data sets.
RESULTS:
The results show an improvement in the correlation coefficient between the experimental data and the simulated muscle activities when taking crosstalk into account.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although the correlation coefficient increased when the crosstalk model was utilized, it is questionable if the discretization of both, the crosstalk and the musculoskeletal model, is accurate enough.
Football players have a high risk of leg muscle injuries, especially when exposed to mental stress. Injuries to muscles of the thigh are common in amateur and professional football, representing almost a third of all injuries. These injuries occur primarily in non-contact situations and from overuse. They can lead to a range of costs, including financial costs associated with treatment as well as those associated with long-term recovery, and absence from training and/or competition. Further, there is a high risk of injury recurrence and subsequent injury.
Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p < 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p < 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p < 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10% (p > 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided.