Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (59)
- conference proceeding (article) (52)
- conference proceeding (presentation, abstract) (28)
- Part of Periodical (5)
- Preprint (4)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (150)
Keywords
- Bildgebendes Verfahren (18)
- Deep Learning (16)
- Diagnose (13)
- Künstliche Intelligenz (13)
- Artificial Intelligence (11)
- Gehirn (11)
- Maschinelles Lernen (11)
- Kernspintomografie (9)
- Dreidimensionale Bildverarbeitung (8)
- Registrierung <Bildverarbeitung> (8)
- Speiseröhrenkrankheit (8)
- Bildsegmentierung (7)
- Lernprogramm (7)
- Schnittdarstellung (7)
- Handchirurgie (6)
- Speiseröhrenkrebs (6)
- Adenocarcinoma (5)
- Barrett's esophagus (5)
- Bildverarbeitung (5)
- Machine learning (5)
- Medizin (5)
- Osteosynthese (5)
- Polarisiertes Licht (5)
- Deep learning (4)
- Endoscopy (4)
- Farbkonstanz (4)
- Gehirnkarte (4)
- Histologie (4)
- ICP-Massenspektrometrie (4)
- Image analysis (4)
- Image processing (4)
- Laryngoskopie (4)
- Medical Image Computing (4)
- Metalle (4)
- Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie (4)
- Schwächung (4)
- 3D-Druck (3)
- Automatische Klassifikation (3)
- Barrett-Ösophagus (3)
- Computerunterstützte Medizin (3)
- Computerunterstütztes Verfahren (3)
- Endoskopie (3)
- Hirntumor (3)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (3)
- Metallproteide (3)
- Neuronales Netz (3)
- Simulation (3)
- Anomalie (2)
- Bilderkennung (2)
- Bilderzeugung (2)
- Brain (2)
- Breast imaging (2)
- Computed tomography (2)
- Computer-aided diagnosis (2)
- Computertomographie (2)
- Dichromatisches Reflexionsmodell (2)
- Digital anthropometry (2)
- Dreidimensionale Rekonstruktion (2)
- Dual-material 3D printing (2)
- Elektrophorese (2)
- Forschung (2)
- Forschungsbericht (2)
- Generative adversarial networks (2)
- HaptiVisT (2)
- Image classification (2)
- Image fusion (2)
- Image registration (2)
- Image segmentation (2)
- Konturverfolgung (2)
- Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (2)
- Literaturbericht (2)
- MRI (2)
- Machine Learning (2)
- Maschinelles Sehen (2)
- Medical imaging (2)
- Minimal-invasive Chirurgie (2)
- Mustererkennung (2)
- Non-rigid surface registration (2)
- Objekterkennung (2)
- Operationstechnik (2)
- PET/CT (2)
- Segmentation (2)
- Snakes (2)
- Surgical instrument segmentation (2)
- Surgical outcome simulation (2)
- Third-Space Endoscopy (2)
- Ultrastruktur (2)
- Video (2)
- Visualization (2)
- Zilie (2)
- artificial intelligence (2)
- dichromatisches Reflexionsmodell (2)
- 3D analysis (1)
- 3D breast scan registration (1)
- 3D image processing (1)
- 3D imaging (1)
- 3D reconstruction (1)
- 3D segmentation (1)
- 3D surface imaging (1)
- 4FC (1)
- A1 adenosine receptor (1)
- Adenocarcinom (1)
- Adenokarzinom (1)
- Adenosinrezeptor (1)
- Aktives Konturmodell (1)
- Algorithmus (1)
- Alloplastik (1)
- Amino acid transport (1)
- Aminosäuren (1)
- Analytical models (1)
- Anatomy (1)
- Antiangiogenese (1)
- Antiangiogenic treatment (1)
- Arthrodese (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Attenuation correction (1)
- Aufnahme (1)
- Ausrichtung (1)
- Autogene Transplantation (1)
- Balloon Model (1)
- Barrett (1)
- Barrett's Carcinoma (1)
- Barrett's Esophagus (1)
- Barrett's esphagus (1)
- Barrett’s Esophagus (1)
- Barrett’s cancer (1)
- Barrett’s esophagus (1)
- Beryllium (1)
- Bewegungsanalyse (1)
- Bewegungsschatzung (1)
- Bildbasierte Verfahren (1)
- Bioimaging (1)
- Bioimaging of metals (1)
- Biomarker (1)
- Biomaterial (1)
- Biomedical imaging (1)
- Biopsy (1)
- Blood–brain barrier (1)
- Blut-Hirn-Schranke (1)
- Blutdruck (1)
- Blutgefäß (1)
- Boltzmann-Maschine (1)
- Brain Segmentation (1)
- Brain modeling (1)
- Brain tissue (1)
- Brain tumour (1)
- Breast reconstruction (1)
- Breast reconstruction surgery (1)
- Breast symmetry (1)
- Brustkorb (1)
- Celiac Disease (1)
- Chest X-Ray (1)
- Co-occurrence Matrices (1)
- Co-occurrence matrix (1)
- Cochlea-Implantat (1)
- Color Texture (1)
- Color texture (1)
- Colorconstancy (1)
- Computer aided diagnosis and therapy (1)
- Computerassistierte Chirurgie (1)
- Computertomografie (1)
- Connectome (1)
- Contour Detection (1)
- Convex optimization (1)
- Convolutional neural networks (1)
- Cooccurrence Matrix (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data models (1)
- Data privacy (1)
- Datenfusion (1)
- Datenschutz (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Diagnostik (1)
- Diffusion-weighted imaging (1)
- Digital endoscopy (1)
- Dokument (1)
- Electron microscopy (1)
- Encoder-Decoder Network (1)
- Endoscopic surgery (1)
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis (1)
- Explainable artificial intelligence (1)
- Facial anthropometry (1)
- Farbanalyse (1)
- Farbbild (1)
- Farbbildverarbeitung (1)
- Farbenraum (1)
- Fehlerbehandlung (1)
- Felsenbein (1)
- Fluorescence imaging (1)
- Force-feedback haptic (1)
- Fräsen (1)
- GBM (1)
- Gabor Filter (1)
- Gamification in der Medizin (1)
- Gastroenterologie (1)
- General Purpose Graphic Processing Unit (1)
- Glanzlichtelimination (1)
- Gliom (1)
- Graphical user interface (1)
- Graphische Benutzeroberfläche (1)
- Graustufe (1)
- Hand surgery training (1)
- Haptische Feedback-Technologie (1)
- Haptisches Feedback (1)
- Hierarchische Wasserscheiden-Transformation (1)
- High-grade glioma (1)
- High-resolution imaging (1)
- Hochschuldidaktik (1)
- Human brain (1)
- Humans (1)
- Hämodynamik (1)
- Image processing (1)
- Image Processing (1)
- Image generation (1)
- Image resolution (1)
- Implantatwerkstoff (1)
- In vitro testing (1)
- In vivo imaging (1)
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> (1)
- Inductively Couple Plasma Mass Spectrometry (1)
- Infinity Restricted Boltzmann Machines (1)
- Information Retrieval (1)
- Integrative features (1)
- Inverse registration consistency (1)
- K-wire drilling (1)
- Klassifikation (1)
- Kmeans algorithm (1)
- KolmogKorov distance (1)
- Komponentenanalyse (1)
- Konvexe Optimierung (1)
- Krankheitsverlauf (1)
- LA-ICP-MS (1)
- Laryngoscopy (1)
- Laser Ablation Inductively Couple Plasma Mass Spectrometry (1)
- Laser microdissection inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (1)
- Literaturdatenbank (1)
- MPTP (1)
- MPTP Treatment (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- Mammoplastik (1)
- Massenspektrometrie (1)
- Materialprüfung (1)
- Mean-Teacher (1)
- Medical Imaging (1)
- Medical diagnostic imaging (1)
- Medical training system (1)
- Meta-heuristics (1)
- Metaheuristik (1)
- Metallomics (1)
- Metals (1)
- Metamaterial (1)
- Method (1)
- Minimally invasive hand surgery (1)
- Minimally invasive surgery (1)
- Model-based imaging (1)
- Multi-modal imaging (1)
- Multimodal Imaging (1)
- Multimodal response assessment (1)
- Multimodales Verfahren (1)
- Multiskalenbilder (1)
- Multispektralbilder (1)
- NMDA receptors (1)
- Nano-LA-ICP-MS (1)
- Neoplasms (1)
- Nervenfaser (1)
- Neuroimaging (1)
- Neuronale Netze (1)
- Nichtlineare Optimierung (1)
- Optical Flow (1)
- Optimierung (1)
- PET (1)
- PET/MRI (1)
- Parallel Execution (1)
- Parallelverarbeitung (1)
- Parametric serial MR image registration (1)
- Pathologische Anatomie (1)
- Pattern recognition (1)
- Pflanzen (1)
- Point Distribution Model (1)
- Polarized light imaging (1)
- Positron emission tomography (1)
- Pradikatenlogik (1)
- Pseudo-labels (1)
- Quantitative Image analysis (1)
- Receptor autoradiography (1)
- Referenzdaten (1)
- Reflexion (1)
- Robot-assisted surgery (1)
- Robotic (1)
- Robotik (1)
- SLAC wrist (1)
- SNAC wrist (1)
- Schnittpräparat (1)
- Segmentierung (1)
- Segmentierung der Lippen (1)
- Sehrinde (1)
- Semi-Supervised Learning (1)
- Semi-automated segmentation (1)
- Semi-supervised Segmentation (1)
- Senile Makuladegeneration (1)
- Signaltrennung (1)
- Signalverarbeitung (1)
- Smart ESD (1)
- Smart Endoscopy (1)
- Smartphone-based surface imaging (1)
- Spatio-temporal information (1)
- Statistical shape mode (1)
- Statistical shape model (1)
- Stereophotogrammetry (1)
- Stroboscopic Images (1)
- Substantia Nigra (1)
- Suchmaschine (1)
- Support material (1)
- Surgical instrument tracking (1)
- Systems biology (1)
- Table lookup (1)
- Texture Analysis (1)
- Texturerkennung (1)
- Three-dimensional surface imaging (1)
- Tissue-imitating hand phantom (1)
- Tractography (1)
- Tumor disease progression (1)
- Tumour (1)
- Vascular Malformations (1)
- Vascular malformation (1)
- Vektorbilder (1)
- Vesicle membrane analysis (1)
- Vibration Profile (1)
- Virtual fixtures (1)
- Virtual reality (1)
- Virtualisierung (1)
- Virtuelle Realität (1)
- Virtuelles Training (1)
- Visualisierung (1)
- Vizualization (1)
- Voxel Spacing (1)
- Zielverfolgung (1)
- attenuation (1)
- camera calibration (1)
- celiac disease (1)
- combined imaging (1)
- correction (1)
- d/l-serine (1)
- deep learning (1)
- diagnostic laryngoscopy (1)
- digital anthropometry (1)
- electronic imaging (1)
- endoscopy (1)
- endoscopy detection (1)
- eosinophilic esophagitis (1)
- hand surgery training (1)
- healthcare (1)
- herbarium specimens (1)
- image co-registration (1)
- image distortion (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- medizinische Bildverarbeitung (1)
- metal distribution (1)
- metallomics (1)
- metamaterial (1)
- multiple regression analysis (1)
- neoplastic larynx disease (1)
- neurodegenerative diseases (1)
- object detection (1)
- quantitative Farbmessung (1)
- real-time (1)
- reconstructive surgery (1)
- robot-assisted surgery (1)
- smoke simulation (1)
- submucosal invasion (1)
- tissue imitating phantom hand (1)
- unpaired image-to-image translation (1)
- villous atrophy (1)
- visual recognition (1)
- Ähnlichkeitssuche (1)
Institute
- Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik (145)
- Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC) (145)
- Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE (38)
- Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST (28)
- Hochschulleitung/Hochschulverwaltung (5)
- Institut für Angewandte Forschung und Wirtschaftskooperationen (IAFW) (4)
- Fakultät Angewandte Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (2)
- Labor Empirische Sozialforschung (2)
- Labor für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Angewandte Ethik (LaTe) (2)
- Fakultät Maschinenbau (1)
Begutachtungsstatus
- peer-reviewed (72)
- begutachtet (1)
The endoscopic features associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may be missed during routine endoscopy. We aimed to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting and quantifying the endoscopic features of EoE in white light images, supplemented by the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS). An AI algorithm (AI-EoE) was constructed and trained to differentiate between EoE and normal esophagus using endoscopic white light images extracted from the database of the University Hospital Augsburg. In addition to binary classification, a second algorithm was trained with specific auxiliary branches for each EREFS feature (AI-EoE-EREFS). The AI algorithms were evaluated on an external data set from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC), and compared with the performance of human endoscopists with varying levels of experience. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AI-EoE were 0.93 for all measures, while the AUC was 0.986. With additional auxiliary branches for the EREFS categories, the AI algorithm (AI-EoEEREFS) performance improved to 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.992 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC, respectively. AI-EoE and AI-EoE-EREFS performed significantly better than endoscopy beginners and senior fellows on the same set of images. An AI algorithm can be trained to detect and quantify endoscopic features of EoE with excellent performance scores. The addition of the EREFS criteria improved the performance of the AI algorithm, which performed significantly better than endoscopists with a lower or medium experience level.
In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence clinical decision support solution to mitigate operator-dependent limitations during complex endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and peroral endoscopic myotomy, for example, bleeding and perforation. A DeepLabv3-based model was trained to delineate vessels, tissue structures and instruments on endoscopic still images from such procedures. The mean cross-validated Intersection over Union and Dice Score were 63% and 76%, respectively. Applied to standardised video clips from third-space endoscopic procedures, the algorithm showed a mean vessel detection rate of 85% with a false-positive rate of 0.75/min. These performance statistics suggest a potential clinical benefit for procedure safety, time and also training.
Forschungsbericht 2016
(2016)
Forschungsbericht 2017
(2017)
Forschungsbericht 2012
(2012)
Aims
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is easily missed during endoscopy, either because physicians are not familiar with its endoscopic features or the morphologic changes are too subtle. In this preliminary paper, we present the first attempt to detect EoE in endoscopic white light (WL) images using a deep learning network (EoE-AI).
Methods
401 WL images of eosinophilic esophagitis and 871 WL images of normal esophageal mucosa were evaluated. All images were assessed for the Endoscopic Reference score (EREFS) (edema, rings, exudates, furrows, strictures). Images with strictures were excluded. EoE was defined as the presence of at least 15 eosinophils per high power field on biopsy. A convolutional neural network based on the ResNet architecture with several five-fold cross-validation runs was used. Adding auxiliary EREFS-classification branches to the neural network allowed the inclusion of the scores as optimization criteria during training. EoE-AI was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. In addition, two human endoscopists evaluated the images.
Results
EoE-AI showed a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1 of 0.759, 0.976, and 0.834 respectively, averaged over the five distinct cross-validation runs. With the EREFS-augmented architecture, a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.848, 0.945, and 0.861 could be demonstrated respectively. In comparison, the two human endoscopists had an average sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.718, 0.958, and 0.793.
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of deep learning to endoscopic images of EoE which were also assessed after augmentation with the EREFS-score. The next step is the evaluation of EoE-AI using an external dataset. We then plan to assess the EoE-AI tool on endoscopic videos, and also in real-time. This preliminary work is encouraging regarding the ability for AI to enhance physician detection of EoE, and potentially to do a true “optical biopsy” but more work is needed.
GinJinn: An object-detection pipeline for automated feature extraction from herbarium specimens
(2020)
PREMISE:
The generation of morphological data in evolutionary, taxonomic, and ecological studies of plants using herbarium material has traditionally been a labor-intensive task. Recent progress in machine learning using deep artificial neural networks (deep learning) for image classification and object detection has facilitated the establishment of a pipeline for the automatic recognition and extraction of relevant structures in images of herbarium specimens.
METHODS AND RESULTS:
We implemented an extendable pipeline based on state-of-the-art deep-learning object-detection methods to collect leaf images from herbarium specimens of two species of the genus Leucanthemum. Using 183 specimens as the training data set, our pipeline extracted one or more intact leaves in 95% of the 61 test images.
CONCLUSIONS:
We establish GinJinn as a deep-learning object-detection tool for the automatic recognition and extraction of individual leaves or other structures from herbarium specimens. Our pipeline offers greater flexibility and a lower entrance barrier than previous image-processing approaches based on hand-crafted features.
Aims
VA is an endoscopic finding of celiac disease (CD), which can easily be missed if pretest probability is low. In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for the detection of villous atrophy on endoscopic images.
Methods
858 images from 182 patients with VA and 846 images from 323 patients with normal duodenal mucosa were used for training and internal validation of an AI algorithm (ResNet18). A separate dataset was used for external validation, as well as determination of detection performance of experts, trainees and trainees with AI support. According to the AI consultation distribution, images were stratified into “easy” and “difficult”.
Results
Internal validation showed 82%, 85% and 84% for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. External validation showed 90%, 76% and 84%. The algorithm was significantly more sensitive and accurate than trainees, trainees with AI support and experts in endoscopy. AI support in trainees was associated with significantly improved performance. While all endoscopists showed significantly lower detection for “difficult” images, AI performance remained stable.
Conclusions
The algorithm outperformed trainees and experts in sensitivity and accuracy for VA detection. The significant improvement with AI support suggests a potential clinical benefit. Stable performance of the algorithm in “easy” and “difficult” test images may indicate an advantage in macroscopically challenging cases.
Forschung 2019
(2019)