Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
- Book (1)
- conference proceeding (article) (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- Offshoring (4)
- Betriebliches Informationssystem (3)
- Delphi (2)
- Information systems (2)
- Knowledge transfer (2)
- Wissensmanagement (2)
- DV-Koordinator (1)
- IS offshoring (1)
- Information systems offshoring (1)
- Information technology (1)
Institute
- Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik (6)
- Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM) (6)
- Research Center for Artificial Intelligence - RCAI (2)
- Hochschulleitung/Hochschulverwaltung (1)
- Research Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE (1)
- Research Center of Energy and Resources - RCER (1)
- Zentrum für Forschung und Transfer (ZFT ab 2024; vorher: IAFW) (1)
Begutachtungsstatus
- peer-reviewed (2)
IT-Offshoring
(2014)
IS offshoring research regarding knowledge transfer processes, roles involved, as well as influencing factors is characterized by its diverse and heterogeneous nature. Covering the last fifteen years of IS offshoring research, this paper provides a consolidated view of the field of study. It presents a generic knowledge transfer process consisting of four stages and five milestones. These stages are characterized and evaluated according to their relevance for knowledge transfer, the types of knowledge transferred, the main activities and methods for transfer and testing, as well as the goals pursued. Furthermore, we aggregate the diverse literature findings relating to individuals who facilitate knowledge transfer processes into a general role. We label this role “offshore coordinator” and present its core tasks and necessary skills. In addition, we identify and cluster core factors that influence success or failure of knowledge transfer. In summary, our study answers calls to discontinue with empirically derived definitions in favor of theory-based conceptualization of the IS offshoring research field with respect to knowledge transfer processes, roles, and success factors. Future studies can build on these results and examine questions with respect to particular characteristics of knowledge transfer processes and their influencing success and failure factors.
An increasing amount of IS offshoring research has been published during the last four years. This paper presents a comprehensive view of the field of study from a managerial point of view. It provides a consolidated view of the field of study between 2010 and 2013 based on a manual search comprising 69 selected journals and 9 conferences, as well as a search using 6 journal databases. The literature review ensures continuity of research by connecting to a comprehensive literature analysis covering the years 1999 to 2009. This way it consolidates and critically reflects the state of the research of the last 14 years. Overall, we compiled 95 relevant publications originating from leading IS journals and IS conference proceedings. The results indicate that IS offshoring research is largely non-theory based, using almost entirely empirical data and interpretive research methods and -to a smaller extent -positivist research designs. The ISO research of the last 14 years focuses on the implementation stages "how" and "outcome" while the pre-implementation-stages “why”, “what”, and “which” are comparatively sparsely researched. Future studies should apply a more theory-driven approach with a greater attention on pre-implementation aspects of information systems offshoring. In addition, future research should investigate the special nature of near- and onshoring, captive offshoring as well asagile (project) management techniques suitable for ISO.
Dieses essential gibt eine strukturierte und kompakte Einführung in die Objectives and Key Results-Managementmethode. Es erläutert Herkunft, Definition und Einsatzzweck von Objectives and Key Results (OKR) und beschreibt deren zentrale Bestandteile. Leser:innen erfahren, wie gute Objectives und Key Results formuliert werden und welche Strategien sich zur erfolgreichen Implementierung eignen. Zudem werden praxisrelevante Erfolgs- und Misserfolgsfaktoren analysiert, die den Einsatz von OKR maßgeblich beeinflussen. Ein fundierter Leitfaden für alle, die OKR als Steuerungsinstrument in Organisationen verstehen und wirksam einsetzen möchten.
The transfer of knowledge from client to service provider poses major challenges in information systems (IS) offshoring projects. Knowledge transfer directly affects IS offshoring success. Therefore, associated challenges must be overcome. Our study examines the determinants of success and failure of knowledge transfer in IS offshoring projects based on a ranking-type Delphi study. We questioned 32 experts from Germany, each with more than ten years of experience in near- or offshore initiatives to seek a consensus among them. We identified 19 success and 20 failure determinants. These determinants are ranked in order of importance using best-worst scaling. Aspects of closer cooperation are critical for effective knowledge transfer. This includes regular collaboration, willingness to help and support, and mutual trust. In contrast, critical determinants of failure are concerned with fears and fluctuation of human resources. Hidden ambiguities or knowledge gaps, an unwillingness and disability to share knowledge, and high fluctuation of human resources negatively impact knowledge transfer.
Purpose
This paper aims to investigate the main tasks, necessary skills, and the implementation of the offshore coordinator’s role to facilitate knowledge transfer in information systems (IS) offshoring.
Design/methodology/approach
This empirical exploratory study uses the classical Delphi method that includes one qualitative and two quantitative rounds to collect data on IS experts’ perceptions to seek a consensus among them.
Findings
The participants agreed, with strong consensus, for a set of 16 tasks and 15 skills. The tasks focused primarily on relationship management and facilitating knowledge transfer on different levels. The set of skills consists of approximately 25 per cent “hard” skills, e.g. professional language skills and project management skills, and approximately 75 per cent “soft” skills, e.g. interpersonal and communication skills and the ability to deal with conflict. Two factors mainly influence implementing the offshore coordinator role: project size and the number of projects to be supported simultaneously.
Practical implications
The findings provide indications of how to define and fulfill this crucial role in practice to facilitate the knowledge transfer process in a positive way.
Originality/value
Similarities in previous research findings are aggregated to examine the intermediate role in detail from a consolidated perspective. This results in the first comprehensive set of critical tasks and skills assigned to the competency dimensions of the universal competency framework, demonstrating which and how many competency dimensions are critical.
Forschungsbericht 2016
(2016)