Comparing monitoring results of two motion trackers for geriatric patients

  • Background: Fitbit and Garmin motion tracker devices are highly used in research. The validity and reliability of these devices is proven for healthy adults between 18 and 64. Objectives: Comparing data output of two devices. Methods: Observational case study on a test track and in the domestic environment of a 80- year-old female multimorbide geriatric patient. Results: HighBackground: Fitbit and Garmin motion tracker devices are highly used in research. The validity and reliability of these devices is proven for healthy adults between 18 and 64. Objectives: Comparing data output of two devices. Methods: Observational case study on a test track and in the domestic environment of a 80- year-old female multimorbide geriatric patient. Results: High significant correlation of the devices on the test track [r=.776, p≤.001, Bca-CI-95% (.618;.874), N=33], but significant different in the domestic environment over time (z=4.840, p≤.001). Conclusion: The dominant/non-dominant body side and further sources of error may play a role in monitoring steps with these devices.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author:Amelie AltenbuchnerORCiDGND, Vanessa Mücke, Sonja HaugOTHORCiDGND
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI200078
ISBN:978-1-64368-085-9
Parent Title (English):dHealth 2020: biomedical informatics for health and care, proceedings of the 14th Health Informatics Meets Digital Health Conference
Publisher:IOS Press
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Editor:Günter Schreier
Document Type:conference proceeding (article)
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2020
Release Date:2021/10/06
Tag:parallel test reliability
concurrent validity; geriatric patients; health monitoring; motion tracker; physical activity; steps; wearables
First Page:77
Last Page:84
Andere Schriftenreihe:Studies in Health Technology and Informatics ; 271: dHealth 2020 – Biomedical Informatics for Health and Care
Institutes:Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften
Research Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST
Research Center for Artificial Intelligence - RCAI
Institute / Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)
Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften / Labor Empirische Sozialforschung
Begutachtungsstatus:peer-reviewed
Open Access Publication channel:Gold Open Access- Erstveröffentlichung in einem/als Open-Access-Medium
research focus:Digitale Transformation
Licence (German):Creative Commons - CC BY-NC - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International
Frontdoor-URL:https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/1596
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.