A Review of Value-Conflicts in Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity is of capital importance in a world where economic and social processes increasingly rely on digital technology. Although the primary ethical motivation of cybersecurity is prevention of informational or physical harm, its enforcement can also entail conflicts with other moral values. This contribution provides an outline of value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a quantitative literature analysis and qualitative case studies. The aim is to demonstrate that the security-privacy-dichotomy—that still seems to dominate the ethics discourse based on our bibliometric analysis—is insufficient when discussing the ethical challenges of cybersecurity. Furthermore, we want to sketch how the notion of contextual integrity could help to better understand and mitigate such value conflicts.
Author: | Markus Christen, Bert Gordijn, Karsten WeberORCiDGND, Ibo van de Poel, Emad Yaghmaei |
---|---|
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.29297/orbit.v1i1.28 |
Parent Title (English): | Orbit Journal - An Online Journal for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT |
Subtitle (English): | A Review of Value-Conflicts in Cybersecurity An assessment based on quantitative and qualitative literature analysis |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Year of first Publication: | 2017 |
Release Date: | 2020/06/24 |
Volume: | 1 |
Issue: | 1 |
First Page: | 1 |
Last Page: | 19 |
Institutes: | Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik |
Kompetenzzentren der OTH Regensburg / Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST) | |
Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik / Labor für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Angewandte Ethik (LaTe) | |
research focus: | Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik |