TY - CHAP A1 - Szalo, Alexander Eduard A1 - Zehner, Alexander A1 - Palm, Christoph T1 - GraphMIC: Medizinische Bildverarbeitung in der Lehre T2 - Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2015; Algorithmen - Systeme - Anwendungen; Proceedings des Workshops vom 15. bis 17. März 2015 in Lübeck N2 - Die Lehre der medizinischen Bildverarbeitung vermittelt Kenntnisse mit einem breiten Methodenspektrum. Neben den Grundlagen der Verfahren soll ein Gefühl für eine geeignete Ausführungsreihenfolge und ihrer Wirkung auf medizinische Bilddaten entwickelt werden. Die Komplexität der Methoden erfordert vertiefte Programmierkenntnisse, sodass bereits einfache Operationen mit großem Programmieraufwand verbunden sind. Die Software GraphMIC stellt Bildverarbeitungsoperationen in Form interaktiver Knoten zur Verfügung und erlaubt das Arrangieren, Parametrisieren und Ausführen komplexer Verarbeitungssequenzen in einem Graphen. Durch den Fokus auf das Design einer Pipeline, weg von sprach- und frameworkspezifischen Implementierungsdetails, lassen sich grundlegende Prinzipien der Bildverarbeitung anschaulich erlernen. In diesem Beitrag stellen wir die visuelle Programmierung mit GraphMIC der nativen Implementierung äquivalenter Funktionen gegenüber. Die in C++ entwickelte Applikation basiert auf Qt, ITK, OpenCV, VTK und MITK. KW - Bildverarbeitung KW - Medizin KW - Hochschuldidaktik Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46224-9_68 SP - 395 EP - 400 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Palm, Christoph ED - Byrne, Michael F. ED - Parsa, Nasim ED - Greenhill, Alexandra T. ED - Chahal, Daljeet ED - Ahmad, Omer ED - Bargci, Ulas T1 - History, Core Concepts, and Role of AI in Clinical Medicine T2 - AI in Clinical Medicine: A Practical Guide for Healthcare Professionals N2 - The field of AI is characterized by robust promises, astonishing successes, and remarkable breakthroughs. AI will play a major role in all domains of clinical medicine, but the role of AI in relation to the physician is not yet completely determined. The term artificial intelligence or AI is broad, and several different terms are used in this context that must be organized and demystified. This chapter will review the key concepts and methods of AI, and will introduce some of the different roles for AI in relation to the physician. KW - artificial intelligence KW - healthcare Y1 - 2023 SN - 978-1-119-79064-8 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119790686.ch5 SP - 49 EP - 55 PB - Wiley ET - 1. Aufl. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Römmele, Christoph A1 - Mendel, Robert A1 - Barrett, Caroline A1 - Kiesl, Hans A1 - Rauber, David A1 - Rückert, Tobias A1 - Kraus, Lisa A1 - Heinkele, Jakob A1 - Dhillon, Christine A1 - Grosser, Bianca A1 - Prinz, Friederike A1 - Wanzl, Julia A1 - Fleischmann, Carola A1 - Nagl, Sandra A1 - Schnoy, Elisabeth A1 - Schlottmann, Jakob A1 - Dellon, Evan S. A1 - Messmann, Helmut A1 - Palm, Christoph A1 - Ebigbo, Alanna T1 - An artificial intelligence algorithm is highly accurate for detecting endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis JF - Scientific Reports N2 - The endoscopic features associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may be missed during routine endoscopy. We aimed to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting and quantifying the endoscopic features of EoE in white light images, supplemented by the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS). An AI algorithm (AI-EoE) was constructed and trained to differentiate between EoE and normal esophagus using endoscopic white light images extracted from the database of the University Hospital Augsburg. In addition to binary classification, a second algorithm was trained with specific auxiliary branches for each EREFS feature (AI-EoE-EREFS). The AI algorithms were evaluated on an external data set from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC), and compared with the performance of human endoscopists with varying levels of experience. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AI-EoE were 0.93 for all measures, while the AUC was 0.986. With additional auxiliary branches for the EREFS categories, the AI algorithm (AI-EoEEREFS) performance improved to 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.992 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC, respectively. AI-EoE and AI-EoE-EREFS performed significantly better than endoscopy beginners and senior fellows on the same set of images. An AI algorithm can be trained to detect and quantify endoscopic features of EoE with excellent performance scores. The addition of the EREFS criteria improved the performance of the AI algorithm, which performed significantly better than endoscopists with a lower or medium experience level. KW - Artificial Intelligence KW - Smart Endoscopy KW - eosinophilic esophagitis Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-46928 VL - 12 PB - Nature Portfolio CY - London ER -