TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Innovationen in der Medizintechnik T2 - Oberpfalztag Weiherhammer, Nov. 2013 Y1 - 2013 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Dullien, Silvia A1 - Grifka, Joachim A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Validation of a Motion Capture Laboratory and a new marker-placement protcol for clinical applications JF - Gait & Posture Y1 - 2013 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.229 VL - 38 IS - Suppl. 1 SP - 113 EP - 114 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Stezowski, P. A1 - Dullien, Silvia A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Eine biomechanische Bewertung verschiedener Belastungsszenarios nach der Implantierung einer Hüft-Totalendoprothese T2 - 89. Jahrestagung der Vereinigung der Bayerischen Chirurgen e.V., 25. - 27. Juli 2012, Regensburg T2 - A biomechanical evaluation of different load scenarios after implantation of a total hip replacement Y1 - 2012 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Dullien, Silvia A1 - Putzer, Michael A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias T1 - Biomechanical outcome after computer-assisted vs. conventional THR – study concept and preliminary gait analysis results T2 - GAMMA Workshop, Hannover, 2012 Y1 - 2012 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Stezowski, P. A1 - Dullien, Silvia A1 - Putzer, Michael A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Eine biomechanische Bewertung verschiedener Belastungsszenarien nach Implantierung einer Hüft-Totalendoprothese T2 - GAMMA Workshop, Hannover, 2012 Y1 - 2012 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias A1 - Dullien, Silvia A1 - Grifka, Joachim T1 - Clinical gait analysis combined with musculoskeletal modelling – coding a new generation of evaluation instruments T2 - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Biomechanik, Murnau, 2011 Y1 - 2011 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Spreiter, G. A1 - Galibarov, Pavel E. A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Ferguson, Stephen J. T1 - Influence of kyphosis on spinal loading T2 - 10th International Symposium Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering (CMBBE) Meeting, 11. - 14. April 2012, Berlin Y1 - 2012 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Putzer, Michael A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Design studies on hip prosthesis using patient specific data T2 - Simpleware Users meeting, November 9th 2011, Bristol, UK Y1 - 2011 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - The effect of multifidus muscles atrophy following disc herniation on disc loading T2 - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Biomechanik, Murnau, 2011 Y1 - 2011 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Galibarov, Pavel E. A1 - Al-Munajjed, Amir Andreas A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Christensen, Soeren Toerholm A1 - Rasmussen, John T1 - The effect of varying the stiffness of spinal fusion devices on the adjacent levels using multibody dynamics simulation T2 - Orthopaedic Proceedings N2 - INTRODUCTION Several clinical studies demonstrated long-term adjacent-level effects after implantation of spinal fusion devices[1]. These effects have been reported as adjacent joint degeneration and the development of new symptoms correlating with adjacent segment degeneration[2] and the trend has therefore gone to motion preservation devices; however, these effects have not been understood very well and have not been investigated thoroughly[3]. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of varying the stiffness of spinal fusion devices on the adjacent vertebral levels. Disc forces, moments and facet joint forces were analyzed. METHODS The AnyBody Modeling System was used to compute the in-vivo muscle and joint reaction forces of a musculoskeletal model. The full body model used in this study consists of 188 muscle fascicles in the lumbar spine and more than 1000 individual muscle branches in total. The model has been proposed by de Zee et al.[3], validated by Rasmussen et al.[4] and by Galibarov et al.[5]. The new model[5] determines the individual motions between vertebrae based on the equilibrium between forces acting on the vertebrae from muscles and joints and the passive stiffness in disks and ligaments, figure 1a. An adult of 1.75 m and 75 kg with a spinal implant in L4L5 was modeled. This model was subjected to a flexion-extension motion using different elastic moduli to analyze and compare to a non-implanted scenario. The analyzed variables were vertebral motion, the disc reaction forces and moments, as well as facet joint forces in the treated and the adjacent levels: L2L3, L3L4, L4L5 and L5-Sacrum. RESULTS When introducing a spinal fusion device in the L4L5 joint the reaction forces and moments decreased in this joint with stiffer devices leading to lower joint loads. However, in the adjacent joints, L3L4 and L5Sacrum, an increase was observed when implanting stiffer devices. Similar trends could be found for the L2L3 joint. The loads in the facet joints showed the same trends. While introducing a spinal fusion device reduced the facet joint forces in the treated joint, the loads in the adjacent facet joints were increased according to the stiffness of the implanted device, figure 1b. DISCUSSION While the treated disc joint showed reduced motion and loads, the adjacent levels demonstrated a significant increase. In particular, the increased facet joint forces in the adjacent levels can lead to adjacent level facet pain or accelerated facet joint degeneration. Introducing a device resulted in preventing facet contact and therefore facet joint loads, even using the device with the lowest stiffness. CONCLUSION The presented model shows that clinical complications such as facet joint degeneration in adjacent levels after implantation of spinal fusion device are consistent with the change in the mechanical-stimulus distribution in the system. Y1 - 2011 VL - 94-B IS - SUPP_XL01 Sep 2012 SP - 2 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Galibarov, Pavel E. A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Christensen, Soeren Toerholm T1 - On modelling spine curvature dependent on muscular and external forces in multibody dynamics system T2 - International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), 13th congress, 2011, Brussels, Belgium N2 - This paper presents a computational approach for investigating effect of muscular and external forces on curvature of the lumbar spine. Multibody dynamics system is used to compute the lumbar spine curvature using a force-dependent kinematics facility, e.g. this method allows releasing some degrees of freedom in order to be computed based on the current load configuration. Y1 - 2011 UR - https://paperpile.com/shared/63VCBY/download/2608c6d1-adef-0330-86f8-7996e623c627 SP - 2 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Rasmussen, John A1 - Bichler, R. A1 - Christensen, Soeren Toerholm A1 - Wirix-Speetjens, Roel A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias T1 - Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Simulation of Hip Dislocation Risk in Activities of Daily Living T2 - Proceedings of the 2011 ORS Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA. Y1 - 2011 UR - http://www.ors.org/Transactions/57/0306.pdf IS - Paper No. 306 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Robie, Bruce A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Rasmussen, John A1 - Christensen, Soeren Toerholm T1 - Axial Rotation Requires Greatest Load in Multifidus Muscle – Potential Association with Low Back Pain? T2 - Annual Meeting of the AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, 2011, Phoenix, Arizona Y1 - 2011 UR - https://paperpile.com/shared/o0LQEG ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Rasmussen, John A1 - Christensen, Soeren Toerholm A1 - Robie, Bruce T1 - The Effect of Spinal Disc Herniation on Multifidus Muscles T2 - 56th Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, New Orleans, USA, 2010 Y1 - 2010 UR - https://www.ors.org/Transactions/56/1487.pdf ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Galibarov, Pavel E. A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Rasmussen, John T1 - Two Computational Models of the Lumbar Spine: BT - Comparison and Validation T2 - Proceedings of the 2011 ORS Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, vol. Marie Curie Initial Training Network "SpineFX" Y1 - 2011 UR - http://www.ors.org/Transactions/57/0786.pdf ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Horner, Marc A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Kiis, Arne A1 - Lawrenchuk, Mike A1 - Verma, Gunjan T1 - A Patient based simulation workflow for orthopedic device design and analysis T2 - SBC Ortho Workshop, June 2011 Y1 - 2011 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Andersen, Michael Skipper A1 - de Zee, Mark A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - MacWilliams, Bruce A1 - Rasmussen, John T1 - Validation of a detailed lower extremity model based on the Klein Horsman data set T2 - Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Computer Simulation in Biomechanics (ISB 2009), July 2nd - 4th 2009, Cape Town, South Africa Y1 - 2009 SP - 27 EP - 28 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Robie, Bruce A1 - Rasmussen, John A1 - Christensen, Soeren Toerholm A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Herniation Induces 55% Increase in Load of Key Stabilizing Muscle – Impact on Herniation Treatment Devices? T2 - Spine Arthoplasty Society Meeting, New Orleans, 2010 Y1 - 2010 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Carbes, S. A1 - Rasmussen, John T1 - The influence of muscle forces on biomechanical fracture fixation simulations – from in-vivo forces to tissue strains T2 - World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 7 - 12, 2009, Munich Y1 - 2009 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Rasmussen, John T1 - The influence of in-vivo muscle forces on the stress distribution in a vertebral body during activities of daily living T2 - Eurospine Warsaw, Poland 2009 Y1 - 2009 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - How much iron to pump? The determination of muscle forces for activities of daily living T2 - DGU, Berlin, 2008 Y1 - 2008 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Gschoßmann, Lukas A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Personalized Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty T2 - 32nd Annual Meeting of the European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS 2024), 18 - 20 September 2024, Aalborg Y1 - 2024 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Melzner, Maximilian A1 - Engelhardt, Lucas A1 - Havelkova, Leonard A1 - Simon, Ulrich A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - A new musculoskeletal AnyBody detailed hand model validated by electromyography T2 - 16th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering (CMBBE) 2019, New York City, USA N2 - The AnyBody™ Modeling System (AMS) [1], is an universally used musculoskeletal simulation software using inverse dynamics. Until now, no complete human hand model is known in the AMS. Also considering other musculoskeletal software platforms, just one detailed entire hand model is recently published [2] but is only based on one subject. The aim of this work is to implement a full detailed hand model for the AMS including all extrinsic and intrinsic muscles using data by the UWB gained through an anatomical study of ten cadaver hands. Y1 - 2019 UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336944957_A_NEW_MUSCULOSKELETAL_ANYBODY_DETAILED_HAND_MODEL_VALIDATED_BY_ELECTROMYOGRAPHY ER - TY - GEN A1 - Auer, Simon A1 - Krutsch, Werner A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Effect of mental demand on leg loading in highly dynamic motion T2 - AnyBody online Webinar, Oct 2020 N2 - Football players have a high risk of leg muscle injuries, especially when exposed to mental stress. Injuries to muscles of the thigh are common in amateur and professional football, representing almost a third of all injuries. These injuries occur primarily in non-contact situations and from overuse. They can lead to a range of costs, including financial costs associated with treatment as well as those associated with long-term recovery, and absence from training and/or competition. Further, there is a high risk of injury recurrence and subsequent injury. Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Auer, Simon A1 - Krutsch, Werner A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Kognitiver Stress führt zu unphysiologisch erhöhten Kniebelastungen im Profifußball JF - Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthtr.2020.04.122 VL - 36 IS - 2 SP - 202 EP - 203 PB - Elsevier ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Rasmussen, John A1 - Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - The influence of cognitive stress on muscle activation and spinal disc load T2 - European Society of Biomechanics meeting 2019, Vienna, Austria Y1 - 2019 UR - https://owncloud.tuwien.ac.at/index.php/s/dovqqcj02VeZHze ER - TY - GEN A1 - Aurbach, Maximilian A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - The impact of the hill type muscle model on the glenohumeral joint reaction force T2 - 16th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering (CMBBE) 2019, New York City, USA Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Psychologie und Biomechanik – Integrierte Betrachtung von Muskelrekrutierung BT - Erkenntnisse und Ableitungen für Biofeedback T2 - Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Biofeedback e. V., Regensburg, 2018 Y1 - 2018 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Virtuelle Modelle der oberen Extremität T2 - 22. Interdisziplinäres Symposium Medizin-Physiotherapie-Sportwissenschaften, 22.-23.11.2019, Regensburg, Germany Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Aurbach, Maximilian A1 - Wagner, Kilian A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian ED - Badnjevic, Almir T1 - Implementation and Validation of Human Kinematics Measured Using IMUs for Musculoskeletal Simulations by the Evaluation of Joint Reaction Forces T2 - CMBEBIH 2017, Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering 2017, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina N2 - The gold standard for the analysis of human kinematics and kinetics is a camera-based motion capture system in combination with force measurement platforms. Alternatively, inertial measurement units can be utilized to obtain human kinematics, while ground reaction forces are computed from full body dynamics. This setup represents a system independent from the spatial confinement of a gait laboratory. The aim of this study is the comparison of the two methods by the investigation of lower limb kinematics and the resulting joint reaction forces within the ankle-, knee- and hip joints. For this purpose, human motion during gait was captured simultaneously by both measurement techniques. 13 trials from 8 different test subjects were evaluated in total. IMU data was processed with a quaternion based Kalman Filter. The data sets were implemented into a musculoskeletal simulation program in order to drive a virtual human body model. Each sensor was aligned to the gravitational and magnetic field vectors of the earth. The angles of flexions, extensions and rotations were analyzed to determine kinematic differences. Joint reaction forces defined kinetic dissimilarities. The overall kinematic differences of both models yielded root mean square errors of 7.62°, 6.02°, 4.95°, 2.79°, 2.38° and 3.56° for ankle flexion, subtalar eversion, knee flexion, hip external rotation, hip abduction and hip flexion, respectively. The proximo-distal differences in force peaks between the models yielded overall for the ankle, 57.33 %Bodyweight(BW) ± 46.86 %BW (16.66 %(Maximum peak to peak) ± 13.62 %) for the knee 37.09 %BW ± 29.33 %BW (17.65 % ± 15.44 %) and 32.03 %BW ± 24.33 %BW (15.6 % ± 12.54 %) for the hip. The overall outcome of this work investigated an approach independent of the common setup of the gait laboratory, thus enabling a cheaper and more flexible technology as an alternative. However, kinematic and thus kinetic differences remain rather large. Future work aims to improve the contact criterion for the calculation of the ground reaction forces and the implementation of a full-body calibration algorithm for the IMU system in order to counteract magnetic field disturbances. KW - Inertial Measurement Units KW - Multibody Simulation KW - Musculoskeletal Simulation KW - AnyBody KW - Motion Capture KW - Bewegungsapparat KW - Biomechanik KW - Motion Capturing KW - Mehrkörpersimulation KW - Ground Reaction Force Prediction KW - Gait KW - IMU KW - Joint Reaction Forces Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_31 VL - Vol. 62 SP - 205 EP - 211 PB - Springer CY - Singapore ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hammer, Joachim A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Cyclic loading and microstructure of cancellous bone T2 - Journal of Biomechanics Y1 - 2008 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(08)70409-3 VL - 41 IS - Suppl. 1, July 2008 SP - S410 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Biomechanical evaluation and optimisation of countermeasure exercises T2 - ESA/ESTEC Bedrest Strategy Workshop, Noordwijk, NL, 2009 Y1 - 2009 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - European Union MDRs impact on device manufacturers: Reprocessing of surgical invasive devices, critical timeliness and technical documentation requirements under MDR BT - [Vortrag gehalten am 26.03.2019] T2 - The validation of sterile medical devices: sterilization, packaging, biocompatibility, toxicology and reprocessing, Amsterdam, 26.03. - 28.03.2019 [Veranstalter: Nelson Labs ; Sterigenics] Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Challenges to innovate in the medical device industry under the light of the new EU MDR : a notified body perspective BT - Keynote Presentation. - Amsterdam, 21.-22.11.2019 // [Veranstalter: Samtek Group] T2 - Intelligent medical devices - the next disruptor in healthcare ; challenges and oppoertunieties: technical, clinical, regulatory and health economics/market access Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Innovation challenges for orthopedic device manufacturers under the new EU MDR BT - a notified body perspective T2 - ORS (Orthopaedic Research Society) Annual Meeting. - Phoenix, Arizona, 08. - 11.02.2020 Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - EU-MDR from a Notified Body Perspective - aktuelle Situation hinsichtlich der Anforderungen zum Lieferantenmanagement BT - Tuttlingen, Technology Mountains / Medical Mountains, 2019 Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - EU Medical Device Regulation: Top Challenges of Orthopedic Manufacturers T2 - OMTEC 2019 : 15th Annual Orthopedic Manufacturing & Technology Exposition and Conference, Chicago, 11.6.2019 Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - KARL STORZ Navigation Panel Unit - Navigation for ENT surgery T2 - FESS 2010 : International Workshop on FESS ; Lectures & Live Surgery. - Royal Pearl Hospital, Tiruchirappalli (Indien), 10.-11.04.2010 Y1 - 2010 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Conformity Assessment Procedure MDR BT - [Vortrag gehalten am 24.02.2020] T2 - MDR Training: Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance Course, 24.-25.02.2020, Tel Aviv, Obelis Academy Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Innovationsmanagement BT - Sitzung des Ulmer Arbeitskreises Innovationsmanagement, Ulm, 03.11.2011 Y1 - 2011 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - General Overview of the Medical Device Regulation T2 - MDR-Roadshow - TÜV SÜD MHS, India Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Singh, Max Diamond A1 - Capanni, Felix ED - Pfannstiel Mario A., ED - Da-Cruz, Patrick ED - Rasche, Christoph T1 - Medizintechnik-Spin-offs aus der Hochschule - Ein Prozessbeispiel T2 - Entrepreneurship im Gesundheitswesen II N2 - Die Aufmerksamkeit für Unternehmensgründungen hat in den letzten Jahren extrem zugenommen. Grundsätzlich muss ein Start-up in einem kompetitiven Umfeld erfolgreich sein, um bestehen zu können. Der Weg dorthin wird maßgeblich beeinflusst durch Planung und finanzielle Ressourcen, die die Gründer bereitstellen müssen. In der Medizinprodukteindustrie kommen zusätzlich große Hürden hinzu, die u. a. einen kurzen Produktlebenszyklus, lange Projektlaufzeiten, aufwendige klinische Studien und aktuell neue gesetzliche Verordnungen betreffen. Dieser Beitrag konzentriert sich zunächst auf mögliche Fördermittel und Beratung von Start-up-Projekten aus dem Hochschulbereich. Aus einer Analyse derzeit existierender Gründerwettbewerbe im Hinblick auf das Gesundheitswesen werden dem Leser entsprechende Adressen zum Einwerben von Fördermitteln geliefert. Darüber hinaus wird ein Pilot-Prozess vorgestellt, wie eine Ausgründungsberatung an der Hochschule Ulm im Studiengang Medizintechnik derzeit verläuft. Dies kann möglicherweise ein Anknüpfungspunkt für eine zukünftige Institutionalisierung von Spin-off-Vorhaben aus dem Hochschulbereich sein. Y1 - 2018 SN - 978-3-658-14781-5 SN - 978-3-658-14780-8 PB - Springer Gabler CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Singh, Max Diamond ED - Schwegel, Philipp ED - Da-Cruz, Patrick ED - Hemel, Ulrich ED - Oberender, Peter T1 - Produktmanagement in der Medizintechnik T2 - Medizinprodukte Management N2 - Das Management in der Medizinprodukteindustrie steht vor vielfältigen Herausforderungen. So sinken einerseits die Produktpreise, anderseits wird auch für die kommenden Jahre in vielen Segmenten ein Mengenwachstum erwartet. Dies stellt die internen Prozesse, vom Customer Service bis hin zur Forschung & Entwicklung, auf den Prüfstand. Die Entscheidungsträger auf Kundenseite verändern sich, weg vom Produktanwender hin zu professionellen Einkaufsgemeinschaften mit immer größerer Verhandlungsmacht. Der hohe Internationalisierungsgrad der Unternehmen führt zu einer steigenden Komplexität bei der Implementierung von Marketing-, Vertriebs- und Produktentwicklungsstrategien auf Länderebene. Darüber hinaus werden zunehmend neue Geschäftsmodelle mit hohem Dienstleistungsanteil entwickelt, die mit der traditionellen Lieferantenrolle wenig zu tun haben und von Managern eine neue Fähigkeiten für die Umsetzung erfordern. Die Autoren des Sammelbands greifen die genannten Herausforderungen auf und bieten mit ihren Beiträgen Lösungsansätze, die sowohl für Manager im Medizinprodukteunternehmen als auch für Wissenschaftler und Studierende relevant sind. Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-3-941678-47-7 SP - 148 EP - 161 PB - PCO-Verlag CY - Bayreuth ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Managing Innovation from the Notified Body Perspective - Understanding the 3 C’s of EU Regulations to Ensure Product Compliance: Changes, Challenges and Contributions T2 - 3rd annual european medical device and diagnostic product development and management meeting, 12-13 February 2019, Brussels Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond A1 - Schlagintweit, S. A1 - Reischle, G. T1 - Additive-Manufactured Orthopedic Implants Under MDR Y1 - 2020 UR - https://www.odtmag.com/contents/view_online-exclusives/2020-08-11/additive-manufactured-orthopedic-implants-under-mdr/ IS - 08.11.20 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Joint NB-Position Paper on Spinal Classification per the MDR Y1 - 2019 UR - https://www.team-nb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Joint-NB-Spinal-Classification-Decision-Tree_final.pdf ER - TY - THES A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Aspects of the Dynamics of Spine Surgery Technologies: Assessing the Reality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the U.S. Medical Device Industry Y1 - 2016 PB - Karlsruhe Institute of Technology CY - Karlsruhe ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - MDR - Die neuen rechtlichen Bedingungen für Händler und Hersteller: aus der Sicht einer benannten Stelle T2 - MEGRA Jahrestagung. - Wien, 18.05.2020 [Veranstalter: Mitteleuropäische Gesellschaft für Regulatory Affairs] Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Medical Device Regulation BT - Kurzer Überblick zur Zulassung von Medizinprodukten T2 - Forum MedTech Pharma: Start-ups in der Medizintechnik: Besonderheiten und Fallbeispiele, München, 17.7.2019 Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Singh, Max Diamond T1 - Market Access for Devices under MDD and MDR: Obligations for Manufacturers T2 - OSMA - Orthopedic Surgical Manufacturers Association, Winter Educational Program - virtual Y1 - 2021 ER -