TY - CHAP A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Putzer, Michael A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Numerische und experimentelle Untersuchungen an der Wirbelsäule T2 - Forschungssymposium Bad Abbach, Germany, 2015 Y1 - 2015 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Putzer, Michael A1 - Auer, Stefan A1 - Malpica, William A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - A numerical study to determine the effect of ligament stiffness on kinematics of the lumbar spine during flexion JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders N2 - Background There is a wide range of mechanical properties of spinal ligaments documented in literature. Due to the fact that ligaments contribute in stabilizing the spine by limiting excessive intersegmental motion, those properties are of particular interest for the implementation in musculoskeletal models. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of varying ligament stiffness on the kinematic behaviour of the lumbar spine. Methods A musculoskeletal model with a detailed lumbar spine was modified according to fluoroscopic recordings and corresponding data files of three different subjects. For flexion, inverse dynamics analysis with a variation of the ligament stiffness matrix were conducted. The influence of several degrees of ligament stiffness on the lumbar spine model were investigated by tracking ligament forces, disc forces and resulting moments generated by the ligaments. Additionally, the kinematics of the motion segments were evaluated. Results An increase of ligament stiffness resulted in an increase of ligament and disc forces, whereas the relative change of disc force increased at a higher rate at the L4/L5 level (19 %) than at the L3/L4 (10 %) level in a fully flexed posture. The same behaviour applied to measured moments with 67 % and 45 %. As a consequence, the motion deflected to the lower levels of the lumbar spine and the lower discs had to resist an increase in loading. Conclusions Higher values of ligament stiffness over all lumbar levels could lead to a shift of the loading and the motion between segments to the lower lumbar levels. This could lead to an increased risk for the lower lumbar parts. KW - Lumbar spine KW - Ligament stiffness KW - Musculoskeletal Modeling KW - Biomechanics Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0942-x VL - 17 IS - 95 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Gross, Simon A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Simulating fatigue in musculoskeletal models using surface electromyography, ECCOMAS Congress, Crete, Greece, 201 T2 - ECCOMAS Congress, Crete, Greece, 2016 Y1 - 2016 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - The influence of stress on spinal loading T2 - ESEM webconference, Dez. 2017 Y1 - 2016 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Süß, Franz T1 - How to determine the effect of working conditions on the human body T2 - 11th International Scientific Conference on Production Engineering DEVELOPMENT AND MODERNIZATION OF PRODUCTION (RIM 2017), Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina N2 - Work places and conditions strains the human body, both psychologically and biomechanically. In order to analyse working conditions and in the following to improve them, detailed knowledge about the effect of the different stressors on the body is needed. This manuscript discusses methods on how to evaluate biomechanical and mental loading and its effect on the musculoskeletal system. A possible workflow for the analysis is presented. KW - Arbeitsbedingungen KW - Körper KW - Mensch Y1 - 2017 UR - https://tfb.ba/repozitorij/2/RIM/RIM2017/01A-Sebastian%20Dendorfer,%20Simone%20Kubowitsch,%20Franz%20S%C3%BC%C3%9F-HOW%20TO%20DETERMINE%20THE%20EFFECT%20OF%20WORKING%20CONDITIONS%20ON%20THE%20HUMAN%20BODY.pdf ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Aurbach, Maximilian A1 - Wagner, Kilian A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian ED - Badnjevic, Almir T1 - Implementation and Validation of Human Kinematics Measured Using IMUs for Musculoskeletal Simulations by the Evaluation of Joint Reaction Forces T2 - CMBEBIH 2017, Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering 2017, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina N2 - The gold standard for the analysis of human kinematics and kinetics is a camera-based motion capture system in combination with force measurement platforms. Alternatively, inertial measurement units can be utilized to obtain human kinematics, while ground reaction forces are computed from full body dynamics. This setup represents a system independent from the spatial confinement of a gait laboratory. The aim of this study is the comparison of the two methods by the investigation of lower limb kinematics and the resulting joint reaction forces within the ankle-, knee- and hip joints. For this purpose, human motion during gait was captured simultaneously by both measurement techniques. 13 trials from 8 different test subjects were evaluated in total. IMU data was processed with a quaternion based Kalman Filter. The data sets were implemented into a musculoskeletal simulation program in order to drive a virtual human body model. Each sensor was aligned to the gravitational and magnetic field vectors of the earth. The angles of flexions, extensions and rotations were analyzed to determine kinematic differences. Joint reaction forces defined kinetic dissimilarities. The overall kinematic differences of both models yielded root mean square errors of 7.62°, 6.02°, 4.95°, 2.79°, 2.38° and 3.56° for ankle flexion, subtalar eversion, knee flexion, hip external rotation, hip abduction and hip flexion, respectively. The proximo-distal differences in force peaks between the models yielded overall for the ankle, 57.33 %Bodyweight(BW) ± 46.86 %BW (16.66 %(Maximum peak to peak) ± 13.62 %) for the knee 37.09 %BW ± 29.33 %BW (17.65 % ± 15.44 %) and 32.03 %BW ± 24.33 %BW (15.6 % ± 12.54 %) for the hip. The overall outcome of this work investigated an approach independent of the common setup of the gait laboratory, thus enabling a cheaper and more flexible technology as an alternative. However, kinematic and thus kinetic differences remain rather large. Future work aims to improve the contact criterion for the calculation of the ground reaction forces and the implementation of a full-body calibration algorithm for the IMU system in order to counteract magnetic field disturbances. KW - Inertial Measurement Units KW - Multibody Simulation KW - Musculoskeletal Simulation KW - AnyBody KW - Motion Capture KW - Bewegungsapparat KW - Biomechanik KW - Motion Capturing KW - Mehrkörpersimulation KW - Ground Reaction Force Prediction KW - Gait KW - IMU KW - Joint Reaction Forces Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4166-2_31 VL - Vol. 62 SP - 205 EP - 211 PB - Springer CY - Singapore ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Pilling, A. A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Experimental workflow for determining psychological stress from physiological biosignals T2 - Jahrestagung der BIOMEDIZINISCHEN TECHNIK und Dreiländertagung der MEDIZINISCHEN PHYSIK, Dresden, Germany, 2017 Y1 - 2017 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - The influence of mental stress on spinal disc loading and muscle activity T2 - 23th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, Sevilla, Spain, 2017 Y1 - 2017 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kubowitsch, Simone A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Jansen, Petra A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Muscular imbalances during experimentally induced stress T2 - 23th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, Sevilla, Spain, 2017 Y1 - 2017 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Benditz, Achim A1 - Auer, Simon A1 - Spörrer, J.F. A1 - Wolkerstorfer, S. A1 - Grifka, Joachim A1 - Süß, Franz A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian T1 - Regarding loads after spinal fusion, every level should be seen separately: a musculoskeletal analysis JF - European Spine Journal N2 - The number of spinal fusion surgeries is steadily increasing and biomechanical consequences are still in debate. The aim of this study is to provide biomechanical insights into the sagittal balance of the spine and to compare spinal load before and after spinal fusion. METHOD: The joint reaction forces of 52 patients were analyzed in proximo-distal and antero-posterior direction from the levels T12-L1 to L5-S1 using musculoskeletal simulations. RESULTS: In 104 simulations, pre-surgical forces were equal to post-surgical. The levels L4-L5 and T12-L1, however, showed increased spinal forces compression forces with higher sagittal displacement. Improved restauration of sagittal balance was accompanied by lower spinal load. AP shear stress, interestingly decreased with sagittal imbalance. CONCLUSION: Imbalanced spines have a risk of increased compression forces at Th12-L1. L4-L5 always has increased spinal loads. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. KW - AnyBody Modeling System KW - Musculoskeletal analysis KW - Sagittal balance KW - Spinal fusion KW - Spine biomechanics KW - Biomechanische Analyse KW - Wirbelsäulenversteifung KW - Vergleichende Anatomie Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5476-5 VL - 27 IS - 8 SP - 1905 EP - 1910 PB - Springer-Verlag ER -