TY - CHAP A1 - Klopp, Marco A1 - Gold-Veerkamp, Carolin A1 - Abke, Jörg A1 - Borgeest, Kai A1 - Reuter, Rebecca A1 - Jahn, Sabrina A1 - Mottok, Jürgen A1 - Sedelmaier, Yvonne A1 - Lehmann, Alexander A1 - Landes, Dieter T1 - Totally Different and yet so Alike: Three Concepts to Use Scrum in Higher Education T2 - Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Software Engineering Education (ECSEE '20): June 2020, Seeon/Bavaria, Germany N2 - Software process models are important in software projects in order to give the work of a project guidelines or a framework. However, teaching process models in higher education seems to be quite challenging. This has to do with the fact that undergraduates have no experience with projects in which process models are used. The theoretical mediation of process models is initially on a very abstract level. For this reason, we chose to combine two didactic approaches, namely problem-based learning and project work. Various traditional plan-driven process models have been expanded in courses in Software Engineering with agile process models. The Scrum Framework is the focus of consideration of this paper. Three Universities of Applied Sciences which cooperate in the EVELIN project focused on Scrum as a process model and integrated it into their teaching. Since the respective concepts of implementation differ, they should be presented and compared in this article to presents some practice approaches. The goal of this presentation of is a uniform evaluation in order to obtain insights from different perspectives. This comparison can draw conclusions for possible necessary improvements of the respective concepts. Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1145/3396802.3396817 SP - 12 EP - 21 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Reuter, Rebecca A1 - Stark, Theresa A1 - Sedelmaier, Yvonne A1 - Landes, Dieter A1 - Mottok, Jürgen A1 - Wolff, Christian T1 - Insights in Students’ Problems during UML Modeling T2 - 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON): Proceedings N2 - UML (Unified Modeling Language) is the current de facto as well as de jure standard (ISO/IEC 19505:2012) notation to visualize models in software development. UML provides essential guidelines and rules to visualize and understand complex software systems. This is the reason why it has become part of curricula for software engineering courses at many universities worldwide. It is well known, however, that UML is hard to grasp for novices, mainly due to its complexity. In order to tackle the problem of teaching UML to novice students appropriately, it is inevitable to understand their needs and problems much better than we do now. This paper presents empirical insights into students' problems when developing common UML diagrams. Identified problems are generalized, giving rise to a problem catalogue that is derived from our empirical findings, thus establishing a basis for addressing these problems through focused learning arrangements. KW - UML KW - UML problems KW - software engineering KW - higher education KW - visual notation Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125110 SP - 592 EP - 600 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Figas, Paula A1 - Knörl, Susanne A1 - Mörtlbauer, Stefanie A1 - Sedelmaier, Yvonne A1 - Schroll-Decker, Irmgard ED - Hagel, Georg ED - Mottok, Jürgen T1 - Developing Software Engineering Education as a Didactical Discipline in its own right T2 - 1st European Conference on Software Engineering Education (ECSEE) at Seon Monastery, Germany N2 - Simultaneously to the growing significance of the discipline software engineering (SE) also its education becomes more important. This reinforces the need of a theoretical foundation of software engineering education, but there is still a lack of scientifically justified didactical concepts. In the context of the project EVELIN (Experimental Improvement in Learning Software Engineer-ing) the authors want to give a decisive impulse for the development of a “Fachdidaktik software engineering” (FD-SE). In order to compile an adequate theoretical basis for a Fachdidaktik of software engineering “Allgemeine Did-aktik” (AD)1, its relation to “Fachdidaktik” (FD) in general, the special branch of science of software engineering and related scientific disciplines are dis-cussed. This analysis is used to justify the necessity of an autonomous scientific discipline Fachdidaktik software engineering which meets the challenges of teaching and learning software engineering. The main contributions of this pa-per are proposals on how this FD can be built scientifically upon AD, on the one hand, and how it can be implemented by specific didactical approaches for software engineering, on the other hand. KW - Fachdidaktik KW - Software Engineering KW - Lehre KW - Hochschule Y1 - 2014 UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269762126_Developing_Software_Engineering_Education_as_a_Didactical_Discipline_in_its_own_right SP - 1 EP - 15 PB - Shaker Verlag ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Landes, Dieter A1 - Sedelmaier, Yvonne A1 - Pfeiffer, Volkhard A1 - Mottok, Jürgen A1 - Hagel, Georg T1 - Learning and teaching software process models T2 - Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 17-20 April 2012, Marrakech, Morocco N2 - Software process models are fairly abstract tools for organizing large, complex software development projects. Since particularly undergraduate students commonly do not have any experience in being part of such a project, their understanding of the benefits and shortcomings of particular process models is very limited. Even more, frequently they are not aware of the need to follow a particular process model since their previous one-person software assignments were too small for requiring any such model at all. Y1 - 2012 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201191 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Abke, Jörg A1 - Brune, Philipp A1 - Haupt, Wolfram A1 - Hagel, Georg A1 - Landes, Dieter A1 - Mottok, Jürgen A1 - Niemetz, Michael A1 - Pfeiffer, Volkhard A1 - Studt, Reimer A1 - Schroll-Decker, Irmgard A1 - Sedelmaier, Yvonne T1 - Evelin – ein Forschungsprojekt zur systematischen Verbesserung des Lernens von Software Engineering T2 - Tagungsband 5th Embedded Software Engineering Kongress, 3. bis 7. Dezember 2012, Sindelfingen Y1 - 2012 SN - 978-3-8343-2407-8 SP - 653 EP - 658 ER -