TY - JOUR A1 - Hartmann, Robin A1 - Weiherer, Maximilian A1 - Schiltz, Daniel A1 - Seitz, Stephan A1 - Lotter, Luisa A1 - Anker, Alexandra A1 - Palm, Christoph A1 - Prantl, Lukas A1 - Brébant, Vanessa T1 - A Novel Method of Outcome Assessment in Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Comparison of Autologous and Alloplastic Techniques Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging JF - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery N2 - Background Breast reconstruction is an important coping tool for patients undergoing a mastectomy. There are numerous surgical techniques in breast reconstruction surgery (BRS). Regardless of the technique used, creating a symmetric outcome is crucial for patients and plastic surgeons. Three-dimensional surface imaging enables surgeons and patients to assess the outcome’s symmetry in BRS. To discriminate between autologous and alloplastic techniques, we analyzed both techniques using objective optical computerized symmetry analysis. Software was developed that enables clinicians to assess optical breast symmetry using three-dimensional surface imaging. Methods Twenty-seven patients who had undergone autologous (n = 12) or alloplastic (n = 15) BRS received three-dimensional surface imaging. Anthropomorphic data were collected digitally using semiautomatic measurements and automatic measurements. Automatic measurements were taken using the newly developed software. To quantify symmetry, a Symmetry Index is proposed. Results Statistical analysis revealed that there is no dif- ference in the outcome symmetry between the two groups (t test for independent samples; p = 0.48, two-tailed). Conclusion This study’s findings provide a foundation for qualitative symmetry assessment in BRS using automatized digital anthropometry. In the present trial, no difference in the outcomes’ optical symmetry was detected between autologous and alloplastic approaches. KW - Breast reconstruction KW - Breast symmetry KW - Digital anthropometry KW - Mammoplastik KW - Dreidimensionale Bildverarbeitung KW - Autogene Transplantation KW - Alloplastik Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01749-4 VL - 44 SP - 1980 EP - 1987 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hartmann, Robin A1 - Weiherer, Maximilian A1 - Schiltz, Daniel A1 - Baringer, Magnus A1 - Noisser, Vivien A1 - Hösl, Vanessa A1 - Eigenberger, Andreas A1 - Seitz, Stefan A1 - Palm, Christoph A1 - Prantl, Lukas A1 - Brébant, Vanessa T1 - New aspects in digital breast assessment: further refinement of a method for automated digital anthropometry JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics N2 - Purpose: In this trial, we used a previously developed prototype software to assess aesthetic results after reconstructive surgery for congenital breast asymmetry using automated anthropometry. To prove the consensus between the manual and automatic digital measurements, we evaluated the software by comparing the manual and automatic measurements of 46 breasts. Methods: Twenty-three patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for congenital breast asymmetry at our institution were examined and underwent 3D surface imaging. Per patient, 14 manual and 14 computer-based anthropometric measurements were obtained according to a standardized protocol. Manual and automatic measurements, as well as the previously proposed Symmetry Index (SI), were compared. Results: The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed no significant differences in six of the seven measurements between the automatic and manual assessments. The SI showed robust agreement between the automatic and manual methods. Conclusion: The present trial validates our method for digital anthropometry. Despite the discrepancy in one measurement, all remaining measurements, including the SI, showed high agreement between the manual and automatic methods. The proposed data bring us one step closer to the long-term goal of establishing robust instruments to evaluate the results of breast surgery. KW - digital anthropometry KW - reconstructive surgery KW - 3D surface imaging Y1 - 2021 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05862-2 SN - 1432-0711 VL - 303 SP - 721 EP - 728 PB - Springer Nature CY - Heidelberg ER -