TY - JOUR A1 - Heine, Norbert A1 - Eigenberger, Andreas A1 - Brebant, Vanessa A1 - Hoesl, Vanessa A1 - Brix, Eva A1 - Prantl, Lukas A1 - Kempa, Sally T1 - Comparison of skin sensitivity following breast reconstruction with three different techniques: Autologous fat grafting, DIEP flap and expander/implant JF - Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation N2 - BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has been established over the past two decades as an additive technique during and after breast reconstruction. Complete reconstruction of the breast mound with AFG alone represents an exceptional technique that has been published mostly in case reports or in studies with limited cases.The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of three different techniques for breast reconstruction on the recovery of skin sensitivity at the reconstructed breast. METHODS: The study included 30 patients after mastectomy following breast cancer. Three groups were examined: A) breast reconstruction by autologous fat grafting (AFG), B) breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) and C) breast reconstruction by expander/implant (TE).Biometric data were compared; sensitivity tests were performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.The non-operated, healthy contralateral breasts of the patients were used as a reference. RESULTS: While the traditional reconstruction techniques by microsurgical anastomosed perforator flap or expander/implant showed a strongly decreased or completely missing sensitivity of the skin, the tests after reconstruction by AFG represented high values of sensory recovery, which came close to the reference group of non-operated breasts. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare skin sensitivity after AFG-based reconstruction to established techniques for breast reconstruction. We could demonstrate in a limited group of patients, that breast reconstruction by autologous fat grafting can achieve higher values of skin sensitivity compared to traditional techniques. KW - Mammoplastik KW - Brusterhaltende Therapie KW - Haut KW - Empfindlichkeit Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.3233/ch-219203 SN - 1875-8622 SN - 1386-0291 VL - 80 IS - 4 SP - 389 EP - 397 PB - IOS Press ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hartmann, Robin A1 - Weiherer, Maximilian A1 - Schiltz, Daniel A1 - Seitz, Stephan A1 - Lotter, Luisa A1 - Anker, Alexandra A1 - Palm, Christoph A1 - Prantl, Lukas A1 - Brébant, Vanessa T1 - A Novel Method of Outcome Assessment in Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Comparison of Autologous and Alloplastic Techniques Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging JF - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery N2 - Background Breast reconstruction is an important coping tool for patients undergoing a mastectomy. There are numerous surgical techniques in breast reconstruction surgery (BRS). Regardless of the technique used, creating a symmetric outcome is crucial for patients and plastic surgeons. Three-dimensional surface imaging enables surgeons and patients to assess the outcome’s symmetry in BRS. To discriminate between autologous and alloplastic techniques, we analyzed both techniques using objective optical computerized symmetry analysis. Software was developed that enables clinicians to assess optical breast symmetry using three-dimensional surface imaging. Methods Twenty-seven patients who had undergone autologous (n = 12) or alloplastic (n = 15) BRS received three-dimensional surface imaging. Anthropomorphic data were collected digitally using semiautomatic measurements and automatic measurements. Automatic measurements were taken using the newly developed software. To quantify symmetry, a Symmetry Index is proposed. Results Statistical analysis revealed that there is no dif- ference in the outcome symmetry between the two groups (t test for independent samples; p = 0.48, two-tailed). Conclusion This study’s findings provide a foundation for qualitative symmetry assessment in BRS using automatized digital anthropometry. In the present trial, no difference in the outcomes’ optical symmetry was detected between autologous and alloplastic approaches. KW - Breast reconstruction KW - Breast symmetry KW - Digital anthropometry KW - Mammoplastik KW - Dreidimensionale Bildverarbeitung KW - Autogene Transplantation KW - Alloplastik Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01749-4 VL - 44 SP - 1980 EP - 1987 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER -